Gay Science - (1887) The Gay Science: Comprised of 5 books Exprsed aphorisms: a ncise ia or - Studocu

Contents:

• THE GAY SCIENCE ANALYSIS
• THERE IS NO ‘GAY GENE.’ THERE IS NO ‘STRAIGHT GENE.’ SEXUALY IS JT PLEX, STUDY NFIRMS
• STUDY SAYS BRAS OF GAY MEN AND WOMEN ARE SIAR
• GAY BRAS STCTURED LIKE THOSE OF THE OPPOSE SEX
• THE GAY SCIENCE SUMMARY
• BRAS OF GAY PEOPLE REMBLE THOSE OF STRAIGHT PEOPLE OF OPPOSE SEX
• WHAT IS SCIENCE THE 'GAY SCIENCE'?
• GAY SCIENCELECTURE NOT ON NIETZSCHE'S THE GAY SCIENCE UNIVERSYAMERIN UNIVERSY (USA)COURSENETEENTH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY (PHIL 602)6 DOCUMENTSSTUNTS SHARED 6 DOCUMENTS THIS URSEAMIC YEAR: 2015/2016UPLOAD BY:ESEMERY SLOAN999+AMERIN UNIVERSY (USA)HELPFUL?00REPORT DOCUMENTCOMMENTSPLEASE SIGN OR REGISTER TO POST MENTS.REMEND FOR YOU3REACTN PAPER MARX (PHIL602)NETEENTH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY (PHIL 602)ESSAYS100% (9)3REACTN PAPER KIERKEGAARD (PHIL602)NETEENTH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY (PHIL 602)ESSAYS100% (2)3REACTN PAPER KANT (PHIL602)NETEENTH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY (PHIL 602)ESSAYS100% (1)3REACTN PAPER HEGEL (PHIL602)NETEENTH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY (PHIL 602)ESSAYS75% (4)STUNTS ALSO VIEWEDREACTN PAPER NIETZSCHE (PHIL602)SIS 206-NOT - LECTURE NOT 2MIC COPYRIGHT SEMTER NOTCHEM-230 EARTH SCIENCTHE ENTERTAMENT INDTRYQUIZ 2 STUDY GUI - LECTURE NOT ALLRELATED DOCUMENTSFAL STUDY GUIMIDTERM STUDY GUITEXTBOOK AND LECTURE NOTEXAM 3 NOTWTE FALL 2019 - WTE OUTLE WTE CHAPTER 3 - WILLS TSTS AND ESTATPREVIEW TEXTFRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE THEOLOGY STUNT AT THE UNIVERSY OF BONN STUDIED PHILOLOGY (STCTURE, HISTORIL VELOPMENT, RELATNSHIPS OF LANGUAG) HIGHLIGHTS: GAY SCIENCE (1882), TH SPOKE ZARATHTRA (1885), BEYOND GOOD EVIL (1886), ON THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS (1887), THE GAY SCIENCE 2ND ED. (1887) THE GAY SCIENCE: COMPRISED OF 5 BOOKS EXPRSED APHORISMS: A NCISE IA OR THEME THAT NTAS A GENERAL TTH. A TRANSN OM HIS EARLIER APHORISTIC WORKS (HUMAN KNOWLEDGE, BELIEF, MORALY) TOPICS SUCH SCIENCE, POWER, THEATER, STCT, HABS, RELIGN, HAPPS, ETC. SETS FORTH MANY OF THE EXISTENTIAL IAS THAT MA HIM FAMO O DOCTRE OF ETERNAL RECURRENCE ATTENTN ON THE PRENT (AWAY OM OTHER AFFIRM PEOPLE OF DIFFERENT HEALTH REACT DIFFERENTLY TO THE IA OF REBIRTH O THE IS PROCLAMATN DEATH OF GOD (108, 125) THE MADMAN: REACTN TO AN ULTIMATE, JUDGG THORY THAT KNOWS EVERYTHG ABOUT EVERYONE AIMS TO REDIRECT ATTENTN TO THEIR OWN HERENT EEDOM THE CHRISTIAN GOD N NO LONGER BE A CREDIBLE SOURCE OF ABSOLUTE MORAL PRCIPL HUMANS N NO LONGER BELIEVE THE SUPERNATURAL, THEY REGNIZE THE WTERN WORLD RELI TOO MUCH ON RELIGN, GOD DEPENNCE ON GOD SHOULD BE MOLISHED TO PROMOTE GOD ONLY EXISTS THE MDS OF HIS FOLLOWERS, HE LIV AND DI WH THEM TH SPOKE ZARATHTRA: O PART OF THE HERD, PENNCE ON GOD IS SUFFICIENT O DO NOT NEED GOD FOR SIGNIFINCE O MAN MT LEARN TO GIVE SIGNIFINCE TO HIS OWN LIFE, WHOUT GOD O SELF DISVERY RAIS ONE ABOVE LAST MEN, OVERE HUMAN NATURE SELF O OVERG GOD AS A GUI OVERMAN IOLOGY GOD O OVERMAN GIV HIS ON LIFE RELEVANCE WHOUT FOLLOWG OTHERS O CHOOSE TO HAVE FAH GOD AFTER THIS REALIZATN IS SIGNIFI END OF RELIANCE ON RELIGN AS A GUIDG FORCE HAVE KILLED REPRENTS MAN AS BEG ACUNTABLE FOR STROYG GOD O CHOOSG TO PROMOTE THE HE WAS LOOKG FOR AN MAN (I SEEK GOD) GOD IS VISIBLE, BEYOND, UNKNOWN PROPHET ELIJAH STORY HUMANS HAVE MA GOD IRRELEVANT, NT LIVE THE PLAC WE PUT HIM GENEALOGY OF MORALS STCTURED APHORISMS, ONE LEADS TO THE NEXTDOWNLOADSAVESHAREGAY SCIENCE

THE GAY SCIENCE ANALYSIS

" To be sure, the philosophy is absolutely horrifyg to anyone who actually unrstands what exactly Nietzsche means by The Gay Science's famo proclamatn "God is ad. Humans have tried to unrstand human sexualy for centuri — and geics rearchers joed the ay the early 1990s after a seri of studi on tws suggted homosexualy ran fai.

“As a teenager tryg to unrstand myself and unrstand my sexualy, I looked at the ter for “the gay gene” and obvly me across Xq28, ” said Fah Sathirapongsasuti, a study -thor and senr scientist at 23andMe, which he joked once led him to believe he hered his gayns om his mother. The rearchers had members of the same-sex muny review the study’s sign and language, and they adm that their termology and fns for gay, lbian and heterosexual do not reflect the full nature of the sexualy ntuum. “[Our study] unrsr an important role for the environment shapg human sexual behavr and perhaps most importantly there is no sgle gay gene but rather the ntributn of many small geic effects sttered across the genome, ” Neale said.

32 pag • 1 hour readFriedrich NietzscheNonfictn | Book | Adult | Published 1882A morn alternative to SparkNot and CliffsNot, SuperSummary offers high-qualy Study Guis that feature tailed chapter summari and analysis of major them, characters, quot, and say topics.Summary and Study GuiOverviewThe Gay Science is a book of poems and llectn of 383 aphorisms five sectns that terrogat the origs of the history of knowledge. He wr:When the maxim, ‘The race is all, the dividual is nothg,’ […] has rporated self to humany […] when accs stands open to everyone at all tim to this ultimate emancipatn and rponsibily […] [p]erhaps then lghter will have rned wh wisdom, perhaps then there will be only ‘gay science.’ Meanwhile […] is still the perd of tragedy, the perd of morals and religns (18). Scientists at the Stockholm Bra Instute Swen report the Proceedgs of the Natnal Amy of Scienc USA that gay men and straight women share siar tras—most notably the size of their bras and the activy of the amygdala—an area of the bra tied to emotn, anxiety and aggrsn.

THERE IS NO ‘GAY GENE.’ THERE IS NO ‘STRAIGHT GENE.’ SEXUALY IS JT PLEX, STUDY NFIRMS

They found that the straight men and gay women had asymmetril bras; that is, the cerebm (the largt part of the bra, which is rponsible for thought, sensory procsg, movement and planng) was larger on the right hemisphere of the bra than on the left. They found that gay men and women, the blood flowed to areas volved fear and anxiety, whereas straight men and lbians tend to flow to pockets lked to aggrsn.

Whout beg aware of , most people n accurately intify gay men by face aloneAlthough I've always wanted this particular superhuman power, I've never been very good at tectg other men's sexual orientatn. In an ial experiment, rearchers Nicholas Rule and Nali Ambady om Tufts Universy pesed onle datg s and refully selected 45 straight male fac and 45 gay male fac. The 90 fac were then shown to 90 participants random orr, who were asked simply to judge the target's "probable sexual orientatn" (gay or straight) by prsg a button.

STUDY SAYS BRAS OF GAY MEN AND WOMEN ARE SIAR

"Th, " the thors wrote, "by g photos of gay and straight dividuals that they themselv did not post, we were able to remove the fluence of self-prentatn and much of the potential selectn bias that may be prent photos om personal advertisements. And even wh the more strgent ntrols, the participants were able to intify the gay fac at levels greater than chance—aga even on those trials where the fac were flickered on the screen for a mere 50 lisends. For example, when shown only the eye regn ("whout brows and cropped to the outer nthi so that not even "crow's-feet" were visible"), perceivers were amazgly still able to accurately intify a man as beg gay.

GAY BRAS STCTURED LIKE THOSE OF THE OPPOSE SEX

I was cur enough about Rule's fdgs to look up "gay face" the Urban Dictnary, a popular Web se that offers rmal, er-ntributed fns of everyday (often crass) saygs.

"A man, ually homosexual, wh a distctly effete facial stcture wh some very specific featur; a strong jawle [sic] that lacks promence, space between the ey that rell people wh down syndrome [sic], and a slopg, long forehead. Now, that one's rather silly and sensatnalized—even polilly spect—and there's certaly no scientific evince support of the claims about the "mongoloid" featur of homosexual men's fac. The imag show the amygdala heterosexual men and women (labeled HeM and HeW) and homosexual and women (labeled HoM and HoW)(Image: Natnal Amy of Scienc, PNAS).

Prev studi have also shown differenc bra archecture and activy between gay and straight people, but most relied on people’s rpons to sexualy driven cu that uld have been learned, such as ratg the attractivens of male or female fac.

THE GAY SCIENCE SUMMARY

“This study monstrat that homosexuals of both sex show strong cross-sex shifts bra symmetry, ” says Qazi Rahman, a leadg rearcher on sexual orientatn at Queen Mary llege, Universy of London, UK. “Paradoxilly, ’s more rmative to look at thgs that have no direct nnectn wh sexual orientatn, and that’s where this study sr, ” says Simon LeVay, a proment US thor who 1991 reported fdg differenc (pdf) a part of the bra lled the hypothalam between straight and gay men. The volum of four cell groups this regn [terstial nuclei of the anterr hypothalam (INAH) 1, 2, 3, and 4] were measured postmortem tissue om three subject groups: women, men who were prumed to be heterosexual, and homosexual men.

In theory, humans and other animals who are exclively attracted to others of the same sex should be unlikely to produce many blogil children, so any gen that predispose people to homosexualy would rarely be passed on to future generatns. Yet same-sex attractn is wispread humans, and rearch suggts that is partly a study of data om hundreds of thoands of people, rearchers have now intified geic patterns that uld be associated wh homosexual behavur, and showed how the might also help people to fd different-sex mat, and reproduce. The thors say their fdgs, published on 23 Augt Nature Human Behavur1, uld help to expla why gen that predispose people to homosexualy ntue to be passed down.

BRAS OF GAY PEOPLE REMBLE THOSE OF STRAIGHT PEOPLE OF OPPOSE SEX

Most of the participants were born durg a time when homosexualy was eher illegal or culturally taboo their untri, so many people who were attracted to others of the same sex might never have actually acted on their attractn, and uld therefore have end up the wrong group the Monk, an elogist and evolutnary blogist at Yale Universy New Haven, Connecticut, thks that the veats are so important that the paper n’t draw any real nclns about geics and sexual orientatn.

WHAT IS SCIENCE THE 'GAY SCIENCE'?

Instead, he thks the rearchers have found geic markers associated wh openns to new experienc, which uld expla the overlap between people who have had a homosexual partner and heterosexual people who have had many partners.

In 1993, a study published the journal Science showed that fai wh two homosexual brothers were very likely to have certa geic markers on a regn of the X chromosome known as Xq28. In 1991, a study published the journal Science seemed to show that the hypothalam, which ntrols the release of sex hormon om the puary gland, gay men differs om the hypothalam straight men. PET and MRI studi performed 2008 have shown that the two halv of the bra are more symmetril homosexual men and heterosexual women than heterosexual men and homosexual women.

The studi have also revealed that nnectns the amygdalas of gay men remble those of straight women; gay women, nnectns the amygdala remble those of straight men. Today, however, we know much more about the bra than we did when homosexualy was nsired a disease that required treatment, and the amount of knowledge that we have about the bra is creasg. If we fe beg gay as engagg homosexual behavr (the ncept of “gay” as an inty is a Wtern cultural ncept – people who have sex wh both men and women may ll themselv gay, straight or bisexual, pendg on the l of their culture or subculture), then people stop beg gay as soon as they stop engagg this behavr.

GAY SCIENCELECTURE NOT ON NIETZSCHE'S THE GAY SCIENCE UNIVERSYAMERIN UNIVERSY (USA)COURSENETEENTH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY (PHIL 602)6 DOCUMENTSSTUNTS SHARED 6 DOCUMENTS THIS URSEAMIC YEAR: 2015/2016UPLOAD BY:ESEMERY SLOAN999+AMERIN UNIVERSY (USA)HELPFUL?00REPORT DOCUMENTCOMMENTSPLEASE SIGN OR REGISTER TO POST MENTS.REMEND FOR YOU3REACTN PAPER MARX (PHIL602)NETEENTH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY (PHIL 602)ESSAYS100% (9)3REACTN PAPER KIERKEGAARD (PHIL602)NETEENTH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY (PHIL 602)ESSAYS100% (2)3REACTN PAPER KANT (PHIL602)NETEENTH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY (PHIL 602)ESSAYS100% (1)3REACTN PAPER HEGEL (PHIL602)NETEENTH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY (PHIL 602)ESSAYS75% (4)STUNTS ALSO VIEWEDREACTN PAPER NIETZSCHE (PHIL602)SIS 206-NOT - LECTURE NOT 2MIC COPYRIGHT SEMTER NOTCHEM-230 EARTH SCIENCTHE ENTERTAMENT INDTRYQUIZ 2 STUDY GUI - LECTURE NOT ALLRELATED DOCUMENTSFAL STUDY GUIMIDTERM STUDY GUITEXTBOOK AND LECTURE NOTEXAM 3 NOTWTE FALL 2019 - WTE OUTLE WTE CHAPTER 3 - WILLS TSTS AND ESTATPREVIEW TEXTFRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE THEOLOGY STUNT AT THE UNIVERSY OF BONN STUDIED PHILOLOGY (STCTURE, HISTORIL VELOPMENT, RELATNSHIPS OF LANGUAG) HIGHLIGHTS: GAY SCIENCE (1882), TH SPOKE ZARATHTRA (1885), BEYOND GOOD EVIL (1886), ON THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS (1887), THE GAY SCIENCE 2ND ED. (1887) THE GAY SCIENCE: COMPRISED OF 5 BOOKS EXPRSED APHORISMS: A NCISE IA OR THEME THAT NTAS A GENERAL TTH. A TRANSN OM HIS EARLIER APHORISTIC WORKS (HUMAN KNOWLEDGE, BELIEF, MORALY) TOPICS SUCH SCIENCE, POWER, THEATER, STCT, HABS, RELIGN, HAPPS, ETC. SETS FORTH MANY OF THE EXISTENTIAL IAS THAT MA HIM FAMO O DOCTRE OF ETERNAL RECURRENCE ATTENTN ON THE PRENT (AWAY OM OTHER AFFIRM PEOPLE OF DIFFERENT HEALTH REACT DIFFERENTLY TO THE IA OF REBIRTH O THE IS PROCLAMATN DEATH OF GOD (108, 125) THE MADMAN: REACTN TO AN ULTIMATE, JUDGG THORY THAT KNOWS EVERYTHG ABOUT EVERYONE AIMS TO REDIRECT ATTENTN TO THEIR OWN HERENT EEDOM THE CHRISTIAN GOD N NO LONGER BE A CREDIBLE SOURCE OF ABSOLUTE MORAL PRCIPL HUMANS N NO LONGER BELIEVE THE SUPERNATURAL, THEY REGNIZE THE WTERN WORLD RELI TOO MUCH ON RELIGN, GOD DEPENNCE ON GOD SHOULD BE MOLISHED TO PROMOTE GOD ONLY EXISTS THE MDS OF HIS FOLLOWERS, HE LIV AND DI WH THEM TH SPOKE ZARATHTRA: O PART OF THE HERD, PENNCE ON GOD IS SUFFICIENT O DO NOT NEED GOD FOR SIGNIFINCE O MAN MT LEARN TO GIVE SIGNIFINCE TO HIS OWN LIFE, WHOUT GOD O SELF DISVERY RAIS ONE ABOVE LAST MEN, OVERE HUMAN NATURE SELF O OVERG GOD AS A GUI OVERMAN IOLOGY GOD O OVERMAN GIV HIS ON LIFE RELEVANCE WHOUT FOLLOWG OTHERS O CHOOSE TO HAVE FAH GOD AFTER THIS REALIZATN IS SIGNIFI END OF RELIANCE ON RELIGN AS A GUIDG FORCE HAVE KILLED REPRENTS MAN AS BEG ACUNTABLE FOR STROYG GOD O CHOOSG TO PROMOTE THE HE WAS LOOKG FOR AN MAN (I SEEK GOD) GOD IS VISIBLE, BEYOND, UNKNOWN PROPHET ELIJAH STORY HUMANS HAVE MA GOD IRRELEVANT, NT LIVE THE PLAC WE PUT HIM GENEALOGY OF MORALS STCTURED APHORISMS, ONE LEADS TO THE NEXTDOWNLOADSAVESHAREGAY SCIENCE

I believe that people have the right to engage any behavr that they choose, as long as their actns do not harm others, and I believe that gay sex and gay relatnships do not e harm to anyone. (Of urse, there are abive and unhealthy gay relatnships that should not be tolerated, jt as there are unhealthy heterosexual relatnships that should not be tolerated. If sexual preference n be altered, then people who support gay rights n’t rely on the argument that gay people should be protected om discrimatn bee gay people have no choice but to be gay – an argument that seems like an apology for homosexualy, as if homosexualy is a disease for which there is no cure.