Unrstandg Gay Communy Subcultur: Implitns for HIV Preventn - PubMed

Contents:

• KEV MAXEN BE FIRST MALE ACH A US MEN’S PROFSNAL SPORTS LEAGUE TO PUBLICLY E OUT AS GAY
• JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS' KEV MAXEN BE FIRST MALE COACH TO COME OUT AS GAY MAJOR U.S. SPORTS
• JAGUARS’ KEV MAXEN IS FIRST MALE ACH TO E OUT AS GAY US MEN’S PRO SPORTS
• 'PASSAG' DIRECTOR NOUNC 'DANGERO' NC-17 RATG ON A FILM PICTG A GAY LOVE STORY
• WHEN DO SUBGROUP PARTS ADD UP TO THE STEREOTYPIC WHOLE? MIXED STEREOTYPE CONTENT FOR GAY MALE SUBGROUPS EXPLAINS OVERALL RATINGS
• JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS ASSISTANT STRENGTH ACH KEV MAXEN OUT PUBLICLY AS GAY
• KEV MAXEN, JAGUARS ASSOCIATE STRENGTH ACH, OUT AS GAY A FIRST FOR U.S.-BASED PRO LEAGU
• UNRSTANDG GAY COMMUNY SUBCULTUR: IMPLITNS FOR HIV PREVENTN
• INTRAGROUP VARIANCE LBIAN, GAY, AND BISEXUAL TOBAC USE BEHAVRS: EVINCE THAT SUBGROUPS MATTER, NOTABLY BISEXUAL WOMEN

KEV MAXEN BE FIRST MALE ACH A US MEN’S PROFSNAL SPORTS LEAGUE TO PUBLICLY E OUT AS GAY

Per Outsports, Maxen is the “first publicly out male ach a major Amerin men’s pro sports league, ” wh WNBA ach Curt Miller, who publicly me out to the media as gay 2015, also a publicly out male ach an Amerin profsnal sports league.

JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS' KEV MAXEN BE FIRST MALE COACH TO COME OUT AS GAY MAJOR U.S. SPORTS

In other words, where Bud Light has buckled unr prsure as bigotry grows agast the LGBTQ+ muny, Gay Water’s creator Spencer Hodson wants his new boozy brand to be the anthis of that. “The key issue that Bud Light tapped to was the fact that they didn’t unrstand their re dience and know enough about them,” Hodson, a gay man, told CNN about the ntroversy that began when the Anhser-Bch beer brand sent fluencer Dylan Mulvaney a n of beer.

Gay Water might not have the ep pockets pared to s petors, like Whe Claw, but “even at small sle, pani of many siz are havg succs makg spir-based seltzers and premixed cktails,” Bryan Roth, an analyst for Feel Goods Company and edor of the alhol beverage newsletter, Sightl+, told CNN.

“There’s lots of space the spir-based seltzer tegory which Gay Water n play, pecially if the brand n offer a cultural or emotnal nnectn that will feel more excg than the prospect of another peapple-flavored vodka seltzer om natnal or ternatnal rporatns,” Roth said. Of urse, other drks e the word “gay,” too, cludg Gay Beer and So Gay Rosé, Hodson noted, which are also tryg to reach the queer muny and offer them an alternative the straight-domated space.

JAGUARS’ KEV MAXEN IS FIRST MALE ACH TO E OUT AS GAY US MEN’S PRO SPORTS

Jacksonville Jaguars associate strength ach Kev Maxen is believed to be the first openly gay male ach major North Amerin men's sports after g out publicly an terview wh Outsports. Is the superordate tegory gay men psychologilly meangful, or rather are specific subgroups, such as artistic gay profsnals, gay male activists, flamboyant gay men, or closeted gay men evaluated distctly?

'PASSAG' DIRECTOR NOUNC 'DANGERO' NC-17 RATG ON A FILM PICTG A GAY LOVE STORY

Before jog Jacksonville’s achg staff, he was a strength ach for the football teams at Baylor and Febary 2022, Maxen reached out to NFL player Carl Nassib, who me out as gay 2021, to seek advice. SiegedSec, a self-scribed group of gay furry hackers, took s skills to state ernments late June, breachg agenci across five stat and releasg a wealth of data.The stat targeted on June 27 were Texas, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, and South Carola. "Uwu gay furri pwn you~ We'll be back aga soon to ntue our chaos and stctn!"Some news outlets, such as Them, raised ncerns that the group's actns uld expose random people to harm, not jt the targeted ernments.

Sexual Subcultur and HIV Preventn Methods: An Asssment of Condom Use, PrEP, and TasP Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex wh Men Usg a Social and Sexual Networkg Smartphone Applitn. MeasurDemographic Characteristics We rporated measur for sex (male, female), sexualy (heterosexual, gay, lbian, bisexual, other), genr inty (transgenr, nontransgenr), age (6 tegori, rangg om 18–24 to 65+), annual hoehold e (ordal sle rangg om 0/ls than $10, 000 to 9/$100, 000 or greater), tn (ls than high school, high school or GED, some llege, bachelor’s or higher), and race/ethnicy (Whe, Non-Hispanic; Black, Non-Hispanic; Other, Non-Hispanic; Hispanic). Due to sample size ncerns, and an tert rporatg sexualy and sex as separate variabl, we llapsed the sexualy variable to three tegori for data analysis cludg heterosexual, gay/lbian, and bisexual/other.

WHEN DO SUBGROUP PARTS ADD UP TO THE STEREOTYPIC WHOLE? MIXED STEREOTYPE CONTENT FOR GAY MALE SUBGROUPS EXPLAINS OVERALL RATINGS

Relatnship stcture was not associated wh sex, tn, or hoehold e bivariate 1Demographic characteristics by relatnship stctureFull samplen (%)Monogamyn (%)Openn (%)NCNMn (%)Relatnship stcture Monogamy2010 (89%)––– Open relatnship 83 (4%)––– Nonnsensual nonmonogamy 178 (8%)–––Sex Male1098 (48%)962 (48%)50 (61%)86 (49%) Female1172 (52%)1048 (52%)32 (39%)91 (51%)Sexualyc Heterosexual/straight2155 (94%)1937 (96%)51 (61%)166 (94%) Gay/lbian 58 (3%)34 (2%)19 (23%)4 (2%) Bisexual/other 58 (3%)38 (2%)12 (15%)8 (4%)Genr intya Transgenr 23 (1%)19 (1%)3 (4%)1 (0%) Nontransgenr2248 (99%)1991 (99%)80 (96%)177 (100%)Age 18–24 169 (7%)134 (7%)11 (13%)24 (14%) 25–34 510 (22%)470 (23%)15 (19%)15 (14%) 35–44 434 (19%)370 (18%)22 (27%)42 (24%) 45–54 397 (17%)347 (17%)17 (20%)33 (18%) 55–64 423 (19%)380 (19%)10 (12%)33 (18%) 65+ 338 (15%)309 (15%)8 (9%)21 (12%)Hoehold e Unr $10, 000 99 (4%)83 (4%)6 (7%)10 (6%) $10, 000–29, 999 329 (15%)271 (13%)19 (22%)41 (23%) $30, 000–49, 999 395 (17%)366 (18%)13 (16%)17 (9%) $50, 000–74, 999 439 (19%)395 (20%)13 (16%)31 (19%) $75–99, 999 376 (17%)331 (16%)12 (15%)33 (19%) $100, 000 or more 631 (28%)564 (28%)21 (25%)46 (26%)Edutn Ls than high school 235 (10%)193 (10%)14 (17%)27 (16%) High school 679 (30%)607 (30%)19 (23%)53 (30%) Some llege 648 (29%)566 (28%)28 (34%)54 (30%) Bachelor’s or higher 708 (31%)644 (32%)21 (26%)43 (24%)Race/ethnicyb Whe, Non-Hispanic1568 (69%)1413 (70%)44 (53%)111 (62%) Black, Non-Hispanic 228 (10%)183 (9%)13 (16%)32 (18%) Other, Non-Hispanic 153 (7%)137 (7%)11 (13%)5 (3%) Hispanic 322 (14%)277 (14%)15 (18%)30 (17%)As noted above, addnal bivariate analys addrsed relatnship stctur among participants wh different sexual orientatns. When analyzg the whole sample, approximately 2% of heterosexual participants, 32% of gay participants, 5% of lbian participants, 22% of bisexual participants, and 14% of those who scribed their sexuali as “other” reported beg open relatnships; approximately 8% of heterosexual participants, 14% of gay participants, 6% of lbian participants, 18% of bisexual participants, and 6% of those who selected “other” for sexualy reported nonnsensual non-monogamy (p <. When analyzg male participants, approximately 3% of heterosexual mal, 33% of gay mal, 23% of bisexual mal, and 24% of “other” mal reported open relatnships; approximately 8% of heterosexual mal, 14% of gay mal, 34% of bisexual mal, and 6% of “other” mal reported nonnsensual nonmonogamy (p <.

JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS ASSISTANT STRENGTH ACH KEV MAXEN OUT PUBLICLY AS GAY

When analyzg female participants, approximately 2% of heterosexual femal, 0% of gay femal, 5% of lbian femal, 22% of bisexual femal, and 8% of “other” femal reported open relatnships; approximately 7% of heterosexual femal, 0% of gay femal, 6% of lbian femal, 12% of bisexual femal, and 6% of “other” femal reported nonnsensual nonmonogamy (p <.

While some studi dite that gay and bisexual mal are particularly likely to engage CNM, others argue that lbian and bisexual women have been neglected empiril rearch, which mak such patterns difficult to substantiate (Rubel & Bogaert, 2015). One benef of workg wh NSSHB data is that, 2012, this study oversampled sexual mory persons and provid distct post-stratifitn weights for analyzg subsampl of gay, lbian, and bisexual participants (Dodge et al., 2016).

AbstractSexual mori are at creased risk of suici; however, is unclear whether there are wh-sexual mory differenc risk across specific sexual inti—notably between bisexual and lbian/gay subgroups.

KEV MAXEN, JAGUARS ASSOCIATE STRENGTH ACH, OUT AS GAY A FIRST FOR U.S.-BASED PRO LEAGU

A nsistent gradient was observed across all four out, whereby bisexual rponnts reported the hight proportn of suici iatn or attempt, lbian/gay rponnts the next hight proportn, and heterosexual rponnts the lowt proportn. E., parg sexual mori to heterosexuals) has led to a growg nsens about the need for more tensive rearch and terventns foced on preventg sexual mory suici (Haas et al., 2011; Plörl et al., 2013) Bisexual Populatns Experience Higher Risk of Suici than do Lbian and Gay Populatns? Sexual mori are not a monolhic populatn (Weiss, 2003); analys of lbian, gay, bisexual, and transgenr (LGBT) persons aggregate obscure potentially important differenc suici risk across specific sexual mory inti (Bostwick & Hequembourg, 2013; Salway et al., 2017).

More work is need to disaggregate quantative data for bisexual groups wh the body of sexual mory health rearch (Ross et al., 2017) all four of the above-ced reviews foced primary analysis and terpretatn on sexual mori aggregate, subgroup analys signal an elevated risk of suici bisexual populatns as pared wh lbian and gay populatns. A send meta-analysis, of data om adults, clud bisexual inty mixed effects meta-regrsn analysis and found that bisexual adults had a signifintly higher lifetime prevalence of suici attempt than lbian and gay adults (average absolute difference: + 7%) (Hott et al., 2016a). A third review of suici attempts by sexual orientatn found that “the majory of studi [reviewed] reported the largt effects for bisexual dividuals, pared to homosexuals” (Plörl & Tremblay, 2015).

UNRSTANDG GAY COMMUNY SUBCULTUR: IMPLITNS FOR HIV PREVENTN

Rults parg bisexual groups to lbian and gay groups, however, were mixed, wh 5 studi showg creased rat of suici iatn or attempt bisexual groups relative to lbian and gay groups, 1 showg creased rat, and 13 showg statistilly equivalent or nclive differenc rat.

Yosho (2001) scribed bisexual visibily as the rult of an unnsc “epistemic ntract” between gay and straight people, who have mutual terts matag the primacy of monosexual assumptns and practic cludg “stable, ” bary sexual orientatn and genr tegori. For example, Canada, 29% of bisexual women, as pared wh 20% of lbian women, and 18% of bisexual men, as pared wh 14% of gay men, report an unmet healthre need the past 12 months (Tjepkema, 2008).

INTRAGROUP VARIANCE LBIAN, GAY, AND BISEXUAL TOBAC USE BEHAVRS: EVINCE THAT SUBGROUPS MATTER, NOTABLY BISEXUAL WOMEN

Quantifyg parative timat of suici-related out between bisexual and lbian and gay groups is important as n provi an unrstandg of the gree to which sexual inty-specific experienc are drivg rat of suici, as well as the opportuny to tailor suici preventn approach wh sexual mory muni.

For example, sexual mory mental health rearchers have proposed sexual mory-affirmg gnive-behavral therapy; however, the approach have been veloped g sampl predomantly nstuted by gay men (Millar, Wang, & Pachankis, 2016; Pachankis, Hatzenbuehler, Renda, Saen, & Parsons, 2015), and there is a strong ratnale to expect that mory strs-related experienc may differ between gay and bisexual people, as discsed above (Persson & Pfs, 2015). Differenc suici-related out between bisexual men and women have not been wily vtigated, though one systematic review and meta-analysis found evince of effect modifitn by genr when parg rat of prsn and anxiety between bisexual and lbian/gay populatns; that is, both bisexual men and women had higher rat of prsn and anxiety than gay men and lbian parators, but the difference between bisexual and lbian/gay groups was more pronounced among women (Ross et al., 2017). For the reasons, we hypothize that any dispary suici risk between bisexual and lbian/gay populatns may be hight durg the adolcent TypeRecg sexual mori—regardls of specific sexual inti—is a perennial challenge for sexual mory health rearchers (Bson et al., 2007; Meyer & Wilson, 2009).

G., past year), while those classified as behavrally and “exclively” heterosexual or homosexual may have had only one partner; the effect of this bias is a tenncy to over-timate differenc health out between bisexual groups and gay/lbian parators (Ber & Brennan, 2013).