“Rich, learned, briskly wrten, madng yet necsary study.”—Lee Siegel, New York Tim Book Review Peter Gay explor the shockg mornist rebelli..
Contents:
PETER GAY (1923–2015)
Peter Gay (1923–2015) - Volume 49 Issue 1 * peter gay modernism *
Surprisgly, the anecdote don’t appear Peter Gay’s “Mornism: The Lure of Hery, ” a massive history of the movement all s artistic forms patg, sculpture, fictn, poetry, mic, archecture, sign, film (though, bafflgly, not photography, one of the chief talysts of the mornist revolutn).
PETER GAY’S ‘MORNISM’ WIELDS A HEAVY YARDSTICK
<p>Peter Gay fally tackl mornism a flawed but thrillg survey of a century, says Peter Conrad.</p> * peter gay modernism *
But bee Gay needs the “lure of hery” to thematilly stcture his book, he often ends up not jt rercg the riture of mornists as unhappy outsirs and elist malntents, but flatg is almost as if Gay were perversely termed to unrme his own profound awarens of mornism’s multifaceted and ntradictory nature.
Yet although Gay wr betifully about Kafka, about Prot on grief, about thentic middle-class hunger for mornist liberatns and about the fal scene of regnn and unspeakable shame Chapl’s “Cy Lights” to take jt four exampl among many he seems to fd more eful to traffic rdboard simplici.
And ’s right for Gay to refer to Munch’s untryman, the odd, fierce peasant novelist Knut Hamsun, as a public admirer of the Nazis who wrote enthiastilly about them even as the Germans were occupyg Norway. But is wrong for Gay not to add that durg his one meetg wh Hler, Hamsun so aggrsively prsed the Führer to stop executg Norwegian ristance fighters and to loosen his reprsive hold on the untry that Hler loathed Hamsun for his solent for Gay’s Parisian mornist “outsirs, ” if the French provid the most extreme asslts on Wtern ratnaly Rimbd’s “disorientatn of the sens, ” André Breton’s celebratn of primal stcts stored the unnsc, André Gi’s enthiasm for the “motivels” crime, Anton Artd’s “Theater of Celty, ” Mrice Blanchot’s claratn of the ath of the thor the reason was simple.
Even if we grant Peter Gay his mornist iology, he still falls far short of providg his rears wh an aquate acunt of the phenomenon of mornism. * peter gay modernism *
It was not that French ndns kept creatg figur remblg Blaire, about whom Gay histrnilly wr that he was “an outst aware of his lonels” though, as Gay adms, Blaire lived at the center of Parisian cultural energy. ” He seems to have momentarily fotten that Yeats, Elt, Pound, Lawrence and Céle on the right, and Pisso, Gi, Breton and the Rsian mornists (barely allud to by Gay) on the left, were about as far om liberalism as a Cubist patg is om an iPod not to mentn the toxilly snobbish Woolf, who was neher right nor too much left. Conversely, Gay’s survey of postwar Amerin art almost exclively refers to the tensely biased and partisan toward his own dub theori, that is Clement Greenberg, which is like quotg a Ju on the character and history of Prottantism.
Spendg years workg wh the Enlightenment philosoph, and more years wh Frd — which yield a Frd bgraphy and anthology, and the five books that formed The Bourgeois Experience, Victoria to Frd — Gay got ed to beg wh the very bt.
Maybe Gay was tired of the people; maybe he felt nostalgia for the pany of the bt, and wanted a chance to be wh them aga, to nnect wh the most creative spirs many untri, many discipl, over a span of more than a century.