Jerrold Seigel; peter gay. Frd: A Life for Our Time. New York: W. W. Norton. 1988. Pp. xx, 810. $25.00, The Amerin Historil Review, Volume 95, Issue 2, 1
Contents:
* peter gay freud a life for our time *
Gay skilfully navigat through Frd’s vast lerary talogue, providg both the personal (i. Do an pecially nice job weavg Frd’s personal life to the narrative; though, mt be reerated: Gay spends the bulk of his bgraphy wrtlg wh the nuanc of Frd’s personal life as relat to his theori.
While Gay plac Frd firmly wh an Enlightened tellectual tradn, he also prents Frd as a dialectil thker wrtlg wh speculative ncepts like the metapsychology of human stct and the nature of aggrsn evolutnary blogy. Gay's Frd is que the sphx. Note: Gay fends here psychoanalysis as a legimate technique for the historil disciple.
Non-fictnAuthor 14 books101 followersMarch 28, 2020Peter Gay's bgraphy of Sigmund Frd--Frd: A Life for Our Time--is a eply rearched and far-reachg examatn of one of the most provotive and fluential thkers of the morn era. Gay weav three strands together wh great skill: Frd the man, hband, father and iend; Frd the tellectual origator of a prehensive theory of how the human md works (cludg s ponent forc); and Frd the lear of a profsnal movement, psychoanalysis, as s preement practner and fatigable fenr of central psychoanalytic prcipl and the man across as a fascatg pose of passns, quirks, loyalti, and, the ma, strengths. Gay pots out strengths and weakns, both as they were apparent right away or beme apparent over time, his theori.
Frd: A Life for Our Time (9780393328615) by Gay, Peter and a great selectn of siar New, Used and Collectible Books available now at great pric. * peter gay freud a life for our time *
Overall, of urse, Gay is sympathetic to what we today would ll Frdianism, but specifilly as emerged when emerged, viewed historilly, not the analyst and promoter of psychoanalysis is prented as tough md, realistic, not always succsful keepg orr the hoe, and a person who om time to time anoted the wrong succsor, notably Carl Jung.