The Delhi High Court has turned down a plea urgg regnise equal marriage, gay adoptn and other LGBT+ rights India.
Contents:
- GAY MARRIAG: CENTRE STICKS TO STAND DELHI HC
- GAY MARRIAGE NOT A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, WEDDG A BOND BETWEEN MAN, WOMAN — CENTRE TO DELHI HC
- INDIAN HIGH URT DISMISS PLEA FOR GAY MARRIAGE
- PLEAS DELHI HC TO LEGALISE GAY MARRIAGE
GAY MARRIAG: CENTRE STICKS TO STAND DELHI HC
Image scriptn: Wrapped a gay flag at the Pri Para, New Delhi. This discrimatn between heterosexual and homosexual relatnships is also vlative of several ternatnal venants cludg the UDHR, ICESCR and ICCPR. It stated that the implitn of Navtej Sgh Johar was to crimalise homosexualy and remove the penal offence prcribed unr Sectn 377 IPC, which did not rult a fundamental right to the regnn of marriage between LGBTQI upl.
GAY MARRIAGE NOT A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, WEDDG A BOND BETWEEN MAN, WOMAN — CENTRE TO DELHI HC
On Monday, the Supreme Court of India said a five-judge bench will start hearg fal arguments over grantg legal regnn to same-sex marriag on April 18, proceedgs of which will be livtreamed on s webse and the urt l favour of legalizg same-sex marriage, will be a landmark moment for LGBTQ people India and the entire majory of the 32 untri and terrori that have already enacted marriage equaly laws are the Ameris and Europe — and, when to relign, are predomantly Christian — so a posive oute India uld fluence laws elsewhere the the seChakraborty and Dang were one of two upl who ially petned the Supreme Court to change the law — the other is Parth Phiroze Mehrotra and Uday Raj Anand, a gay uple New Delhi — but the number of petners has sce grown, and the Supreme Court has also transferred several s om other high urts, cludg those Delhi and petn argu that India's Special Marriage Act, 1954 should allow same-sex upl to have the same legal right to marriage as oppose sex upl and that nyg them that right vlat several articl of India's Special Marriage Act solemniz marriage outsi of the relign or fah of eher spoe, as opposed to unns registered unr laws related to relig unns, such as the Hdu Marriage Act, It HappensTennsee law rtrictg drag is the 1st of many such proposed bills the U. Sgapore to repeal lonial-era law banng sex between menPri celebratns happeng war-torn Kharkiv as LGBTQ muny fights for rights"The urts are not bound by popular opn, " said Shep Sgh, the founr and director of the Indian onle LGBTQ magaze Gaylaxy.
INDIAN HIGH URT DISMISS PLEA FOR GAY MARRIAGE
"WATCH | LGBTQ muny India marks 2018 crimalizatn of homosexualy: Gay sex ban overturned IndiaCBC News spoke to members of the Indo-Canadian muny to fd out what the historic lg means to of rights brgs bra draPolil and societal chang haven't happened quickly enough for many LGBTQ Indians, who have opted to rettle more progrsive untri. He referred to a 2014 World Bank se study, tled The Enomic Cost of Homophobia, that timated India may be sacrificg up to 1. Conservative phback expectedA urt cisn allowg same-sex marriage is not likely to benef everyone the same way, utned Sgh, of the magaze Gaylaxy.
"Shep Sgh, the founr and director of the Indian onle LGBTQ magaze Gaylaxy, says a urt cisn allowg same-sex marriage is not likely to benef everyone the same way, pecially women who are poor. (Submted by Shep Sgh)Women, pecially those who are poor, face different stggl Indian society, Sgh said, while men "whether gay or straight, they have a lot of leeway. “The issue here is whether marriage is permissible between homosexual upl.
PLEAS DELHI HC TO LEGALISE GAY MARRIAGE
It merely crimalis nsensual homosexual act. Advote Kana Nandy, appearg for one of the upl, said they got married New York and the laws applible were Cizenship Act, Foreign Marriage Act (FMA) and Special Marriage poted out that Centre had not yet filed a reply to her clients’ plea that highlighted how Cizenship Act was silent on the genr and sexualy of the advote Srabh Kirpal, reprentg another set of petners, said the Supreme Court verdict on homosexualy might not have exprsly allowed same-sex marriage, but nstutnal jurispnce required terpretatn and the verdict favoured regnisg high urt listed for fal hearg all petns that clu two same-sex upl seekg a claratn regnisg their unn unr the special, Hdu, and foreign marriage laws.
The other petners have ntend that homosexualy has been crimalised by the apex urt, but same-sex marriag are still not beg allowed unr Hdu Marriage Act.
“The petners subm that non-regnn of same-sex marriag is a wanton act of discrimatn that strik at the root of digny and self-fulfillment of LGBTQ (lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr, queer) upl, ” the petn read. Guswamy and Katju were among the lawyers who argued the se agast Sectn 377 of the Indian Penal Co which led to the Supreme Court crimalisg homosexualy 2018. The Supreme Court had subsequently crimilised homosexualy, part of the 158-year-old lonial law unr Sectn 377 2018.