Gay and Lbian Parentg: A Systematic Review of Them and Methodologil Strategi of Brazilian Rearch | SprgerLk

Contents:

• MAGAZE STAND :: THE GAY & LBIAN REVIEW – JULY/AUGT 2023
• GAY AND LBIAN PARENTG: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THEM AND METHODOLOGIL STRATEGI OF BRAZILIAN REARCH
• THE GAY & LBIAN REVIEW – MARCH/APRIL 2016
• THE GAY & LBIAN REVIEW WORLDWI.

MAGAZE STAND :: THE GAY & LBIAN REVIEW – JULY/AUGT 2023

Ramadan ftly ptur what means to be a homosexual a eply relig culture racked wh polil vlence, where nearly every aspect of life is dictated by tradn and the Koran, which turn is driven by the patriarchal and the mascule. HARDLY FIND a more diverse group of books than this: one by a pneerg Jewish lbian poet origally om Poland; one by a French surrealist; and a third by a gay man livg Dallas. The Gay & Lbian Review Edor Richard Schneir opens the July-Augt 2023 issue by explorg the theme “Fantasy Lands”: “Today’s digal technologi have created possibili for whole new worlds of immersn and experience, and wh them a panoply of subcultur anized around the s.

Culled om a longlist of hundreds, movi nsired for the list promently feature gay, lbian, trans, or queer characters; ncern self centrally wh LGBTQ+ them; prent s LGBTQ+ characters a fair and realistic light; and/or be seen as a touchpot the evolutn of queer cema. And we regnize that some of the films the list will re-igne healthy bat that have been fixtur of discsn around LGBTQ+ films — straight actors playg gay characters, cis actors playg trans characters, and the historil domance of whe male perspectiv. For our most recent update to the list, we’ve add mastream edi Fire Island and Bros, thriller Knock at the Cab (featurg two pairs of hbands whose vatn is terpted by the potential apolypse), Disney feature Strange World (wh the stud’s first openly gay lead character), Blue Jean (a Brish drama set durg the Thatcher premiership), the extremely well-reviewed Girl Picture), France’s magil realist The Five Devils, and Cann 2023 buts Monster and Strange Way of Life.

Crics Consens: We Were Here reviss the cris facg the gay muny the early 1980s -- and offers a powerful tribute to the spirg rolve shown at a time of turmoil.

GAY AND LBIAN PARENTG: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THEM AND METHODOLOGIL STRATEGI OF BRAZILIAN REARCH

Lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr, queer, and non-bary dividuals (LGBTQ +) have been members of fai of orig, fai of choice, and fai head by lbian and gay parents throughout history. Most gay men bee parents the ntext of prev relatnships, adoptn, and through assisted reproductive technologi (Carneiro et al., 2017; Wycisk, 2015) of June 2021, 30 untri worldwi regnize same-sex marriag. In Europe, some untri, such as Atria, Belgium, Denmark, Fland, France, Germany, Greenland, Ireland, Iceland, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Northern Ireland, Portugal, Spa, Swen, and the Uned Kgdom, the adoptn by same-sex upl, as well as sgle lbian, gay, and bisexual dividuals, is allowed.

However, more and more, lbians, gays, and bisexuals create their fay arrangements and have received visibily and support, maly due to the legal and polil regnn of civil marriage and the adoptn among same-sex upl Lat Ameri (Lira & Morais, 2017; Ryan & Berkowz, 2009) 1995, Brazil announced the Registered Civil Partnership-PCR bill No. In this sense, some profsnals unrstood that gay and lbian dividuals uld also be treated the same way as heterosexual cisgenr dividuals and they provid them wh this service.

However, the parental rights of gay and lbian parents have not always been guaranteed, sce they still pend on jurispnce (Cerqueira-Santos et al., 2017). Addnally, there are difficulti timatg wh precisn the number of fai head by gay or lbian parents several untri, pecially Brazil (Power et al., 2010). In particular, there is a gap the scientific lerature regardg which methodologil strategi and stments are ed for vtigatg stigma and rilience procs fai head by gay or lbian parents (Lira & Morais, 2017; Meyer & Frost, 2013).

THE GAY & LBIAN REVIEW – MARCH/APRIL 2016

Although procr such as terviews and clil observatns are tly relevant environments dited to fay health, standardized stments for asssg lbian and gay parentg may have some advantag ntexts such as psychotherapy, physil and mental health re, social, and legal assistance (Costa et al., 2013a, b) stments provi evince regardg the needs, fenc, and loss of the fay system and n strengthen the nsistency and validy of the fdgs towards stutns foced on the re and promotn of fay health (Lira & Morais, 2018; Parker et al., 2018). Also, the discsn regardg the typ of evince-based stments and/or fay terventns n further promote an crease the qualy of life and well-beg of lbian and gay parents and their children through the preparatn and planng of asssments and fay health procr that are more sensive to the real mands of the fay nfiguratns (Lira & Morais, 2018; Parker et al., 2018; Wright & Masten, 2015). The analysis of such the scientific lerature regardg which n provi a culturally sensive unrstandg of what aspects of fay health has been vtigated, what measur or strategi were ed rearch as regards fai head by lbian and gay parents (Lira & Morais, 2017; Meyer & Frost, 2013).

THE GAY & LBIAN REVIEW WORLDWI.

Incln CreriaArticl were eligible for cln the review acrdg to the followg creria: (a) be an empiril article of quantative, qualative, or multi-method character wh full-text available; (b) havg as rearch participants cisgenr gay or lbian parents and/or their children; (c) published the perd between 2009 and October 2019; (d) English and Portugue; (e) alg wh aspects of cisgenr gay and lbian parentg; and (f) beg a study nducted wh Brazilian participants or wh Brazilian ntext—produced or about Brazil or a Brazilian regn/cy. Afterwards, we analyzed abstracts, and we nsired the excln creria listed below: duplite articl; book chapters; news; technil documents; ments; other lerature reviews (systematic and narrative); dissertatns and th; and studi whose objective alt wh the theme of homosexualy but did not relate to fai or parentg.

We cid not to clu systematic reviews and theoretil articl or those that alt wh the attus of the general populatn or profsnals regardg lbian and gay parentg the rp of analysis, le wh the objective of this study, which is to characterize the scientific lerature as regards fai head by gay or lbian parents, terms of objectiv, methods, them, and rults. In Portugue, we ed the followg batn of search scriptors wh Boolean operators: (homossexual* OR lésbi OR gay OR homoparental OR lgbt*) AND (fa* OR parentalida OR maternida OR paternida OR “reprodução assistida” OR “direos reprodutivos”) AND (Brasil*) NOT (trans*). In English, we ed the followg terms: (homosexual* OR lbian OR gay OR lgbt* OR same-sex) AND (fa* OR parent* OR mother* OR father* OR “assisted reproductn” OR “reproductive rights”) AND (Brazil*) NOT (trans*).

We did, however, mata our emphasis on unrstandg the methodologil strategi of studi regardg gay and lbian parents and their children’s perspectiv on their experienc. Concerng the, rearchers nducted most studi wh female parental upl or lbian parents a stable relatnship, married, or habg (n = 11), and among the, some also clud divorced and remarried lbian parents (n = 4), and male parental upl or married (Mach, 2016; Tombolato et al., 2018; Vule et al., 2015) or sgle gay parent (Amazonas et al., 2013). Many studi reported the difficulty to accs gay and lbian parents and their children when they first ntacted muny health re or social and legal assistance stutns or NGOs that worked wh sexual mory dividuals and many rearchers achieved the participants through their social work.