Contents:
- THIS PSYCHOLOGIST’S “GAYDAR” REARCH MAK UNFORTABLE. THAT’S THE POT.
- ARTIFICIAL TELLIGENCE N INTIFY 'GAY FAC' OM A PICTURE, STUDY CLAIMS
- FACIAL HTS SHARPEN PEOPLE'S 'GAYDAR'
- GAY AND STRAIGHT MEN MAY HAVE DIFFERENT FACIAL SHAP, NEW STUDY SUGGTS
THIS PSYCHOLOGIST’S “GAYDAR” REARCH MAK UNFORTABLE. THAT’S THE POT.
Shape differenc between the fac of homosexual and heterosexual men. Prev studi have shown that homosexual men differ om heterosexual men several somatic tras and lay people accurately attribute sexual orientatn based on facial imag. Th, we may predict that morphologil differenc between fac of homosexual and heterosexual dividuals n cue to sexual orientatn.
The ma aim of this study was to tt for possible differenc facial shape between heterosexual and homosexual men. In Study 1, we ed geometric morphometrics to tt for differenc facial shape between homosexual and heterosexual men. The analysis revealed signifint shape differenc fac of heterosexual and homosexual men.
Homosexual men showed relatively wir and shorter fac, smaller and shorter nos, and rather massive and more round jaws, rultg a mosaic of both feme and mascule featur. However, homosexual men were rated as more mascule than heterosexual men, which may expla the misjudgment of sexual orientatn.
ARTIFICIAL TELLIGENCE N INTIFY 'GAY FAC' OM A PICTURE, STUDY CLAIMS
Th, our rults showed that differenc facial morphology of homosexual and heterosexual men do not simply mirror variatn femy, and the stereotypic associatn of feme lookg men as homosexual may nfound judgments of sexual orientatn. Detectn of sexual orientatn ("gaydar") by homosexual and heterosexual women. Sex-dimorphic face shape preference heterosexual and homosexual men and women.
J Homosex. A total of 52 lbian women, 134 heterosexual women, 77 gay men, and 127 heterosexual men were reced at a Canadian mp and var Canadian Pri and sexualy events. Gay and heterosexual men differed 11 facial featur at the univariate level, of which three were unique multivariate predictors.
FACIAL HTS SHARPEN PEOPLE'S 'GAYDAR'
Gay men had more nvex cheeks, shorter nos (also heterosexual women), and foreheads that were more tilted back relative to heterosexual men. ABC of sexual health: homosexual men and women. Speech Atic Featur: A Comparison of Gay Men, Heterosexual Men, and Heterosexual Women.
GAYDAR: The Dorian Gray Effect.
GAY AND STRAIGHT MEN MAY HAVE DIFFERENT FACIAL SHAP, NEW STUDY SUGGTS
"Gaydar"—the abily to terme a glance whether someone is gay or lbian—pends part on genr norms. Cur about gaydar's reliabily, Ambady and Rule vised experiments which they asked volunteers to take a look at close-cropped head shots and gus whether each face belonged to someone who is gay, lbian, or straight. People wh the sharpt gaydar are gay men and lbians, naturally, and ovulatg women.
Subjects intify lbians accurately between 64 and 70 percent of the time; gay men are rrectly intified wh slightly ls reliabily, the 60 to 65 percent range. It's easy to nclu that the abily to tect sexual orientatn pends on blogil cu alone —the gay man wh doe ey or lite cheekbon, the lbian wh a strong jawle. Metrosexuals trigger false alarms; lbian femm and gay Marlboro men often ri unr the gaydar.
What's pecially tertg is when gaydar go off the absence of genr-atypil cu. Rule has a theory that gay-related exprsns may create "repetive patterns of mculature that rult a certa look. " Stereotypilly, gay men are more emotnally exprsive than straight guys, adoptg more female-typil facial movements, and some lbians may exprs themselv more like straight men.