Contents:
- THIS PSYCHOLOGIST’S “GAYDAR” REARCH MAK UNFORTABLE. THAT’S THE POT.
- ARTIFICIAL TELLIGENCE N INTIFY 'GAY FAC' OM A PICTURE, STUDY CLAIMS
- FACIAL HTS SHARPEN PEOPLE'S 'GAYDAR'
- GAY AND STRAIGHT MEN MAY HAVE DIFFERENT FACIAL SHAP, NEW STUDY SUGGTS
THIS PSYCHOLOGIST’S “GAYDAR” REARCH MAK UNFORTABLE. THAT’S THE POT.
Shape differenc between the fac of homosexual and heterosexual men.
ARTIFICIAL TELLIGENCE N INTIFY 'GAY FAC' OM A PICTURE, STUDY CLAIMS
Prev studi have shown that homosexual men differ om heterosexual men several somatic tras and lay people accurately attribute sexual orientatn based on facial imag. Th, we may predict that morphologil differenc between fac of homosexual and heterosexual dividuals n cue to sexual orientatn.
FACIAL HTS SHARPEN PEOPLE'S 'GAYDAR'
The ma aim of this study was to tt for possible differenc facial shape between heterosexual and homosexual men.
GAY AND STRAIGHT MEN MAY HAVE DIFFERENT FACIAL SHAP, NEW STUDY SUGGTS
In Study 1, we ed geometric morphometrics to tt for differenc facial shape between homosexual and heterosexual men. The analysis revealed signifint shape differenc fac of heterosexual and homosexual men. Homosexual men showed relatively wir and shorter fac, smaller and shorter nos, and rather massive and more round jaws, rultg a mosaic of both feme and mascule featur.
However, homosexual men were rated as more mascule than heterosexual men, which may expla the misjudgment of sexual orientatn. Th, our rults showed that differenc facial morphology of homosexual and heterosexual men do not simply mirror variatn femy, and the stereotypic associatn of feme lookg men as homosexual may nfound judgments of sexual orientatn.
Detectn of sexual orientatn ("gaydar") by homosexual and heterosexual women.