Contents:
- THIS PSYCHOLOGIST’S “GAYDAR” REARCH MAK UNFORTABLE. THAT’S THE POT.
- ARTIFICIAL TELLIGENCE N INTIFY 'GAY FAC' OM A PICTURE, STUDY CLAIMS
- FACIAL HTS SHARPEN PEOPLE'S 'GAYDAR'
- GAY AND STRAIGHT MEN MAY HAVE DIFFERENT FACIAL SHAP, NEW STUDY SUGGTS
THIS PSYCHOLOGIST’S “GAYDAR” REARCH MAK UNFORTABLE. THAT’S THE POT.
Shape differenc between the fac of homosexual and heterosexual men.
ARTIFICIAL TELLIGENCE N INTIFY 'GAY FAC' OM A PICTURE, STUDY CLAIMS
Prev studi have shown that homosexual men differ om heterosexual men several somatic tras and lay people accurately attribute sexual orientatn based on facial imag.
Th, we may predict that morphologil differenc between fac of homosexual and heterosexual dividuals n cue to sexual orientatn.
The ma aim of this study was to tt for possible differenc facial shape between heterosexual and homosexual men. In Study 1, we ed geometric morphometrics to tt for differenc facial shape between homosexual and heterosexual men.
FACIAL HTS SHARPEN PEOPLE'S 'GAYDAR'
The analysis revealed signifint shape differenc fac of heterosexual and homosexual men. Homosexual men showed relatively wir and shorter fac, smaller and shorter nos, and rather massive and more round jaws, rultg a mosaic of both feme and mascule featur. However, homosexual men were rated as more mascule than heterosexual men, which may expla the misjudgment of sexual orientatn.
Th, our rults showed that differenc facial morphology of homosexual and heterosexual men do not simply mirror variatn femy, and the stereotypic associatn of feme lookg men as homosexual may nfound judgments of sexual orientatn. Detectn of sexual orientatn ("gaydar") by homosexual and heterosexual women. Sex-dimorphic face shape preference heterosexual and homosexual men and women.
GAY AND STRAIGHT MEN MAY HAVE DIFFERENT FACIAL SHAP, NEW STUDY SUGGTS
J Homosex. A total of 52 lbian women, 134 heterosexual women, 77 gay men, and 127 heterosexual men were reced at a Canadian mp and var Canadian Pri and sexualy events. Gay and heterosexual men differed 11 facial featur at the univariate level, of which three were unique multivariate predictors.
Gay men had more nvex cheeks, shorter nos (also heterosexual women), and foreheads that were more tilted back relative to heterosexual men.