How Bros Reclaims The Funny Gay Sex Scene

Contents:

• STAR OF 'HISTORIC' GAY MOVIE GETS BACKLASH AFTER BLAMG 'STRAIGHT PEOPLE' FOR OPENG WEEKEND BOX OFFICE FLOP
• ALL GAY ROM- ‘BROS’ A BOX OFFICE DISASTER, FILM STAR FLTS ‘HOMOPHOBIC WEIRDO’ MOVIE-GOG DIENCE
• ACTOR BLAM HOMOPHOBIA FOR GAY ROM- ‘BROS’ HARD FLOP AT BOX OFFICE
• HOW BROS RECLAIMS THE FUNNY GAY SEX SCENE
• COMMENTARY: THE REAL LSON OF ‘BROS’: IT’S OK TO LET GAY ART BOMB
• ‘BROS’ CREATOR BLAM MISSG STRAIGHT DIENC FOR GAY ROM- FLOP
• 'BROS' CREATOR BLAM MISSG STRAIGHT DIENC FOR GAY ROM- FLOP
• IS TROYE SIVAN’S ‘RH’ SEXY FUN OR GAY DETR?

STAR OF 'HISTORIC' GAY MOVIE GETS BACKLASH AFTER BLAMG 'STRAIGHT PEOPLE' FOR OPENG WEEKEND BOX OFFICE FLOP

To paraphrase an early episo of Law & Orr, Bros didn’t fail at the box office bee was a gay theatril live-actn rom-.

ALL GAY ROM- ‘BROS’ A BOX OFFICE DISASTER, FILM STAR FLTS ‘HOMOPHOBIC WEIRDO’ MOVIE-GOG DIENCE

It died bee was a theatril live-actn rom- that was gay.

ACTOR BLAM HOMOPHOBIA FOR GAY ROM- ‘BROS’ HARD FLOP AT BOX OFFICE

It was ‘jt’ the first mastream gay theatril rom-. Eichner took some grief onle when he discsed the film as the first gay rom-, revisg his statement to the first mastream, major stud theatril rom-.

Universal would have had to fend off accatns of homophobia had they nied the film a theatril release. In an unholy mix of entlement and entertament, the maker of a “historic” (acrdg to The Hollywood Reporter) romantic edy about gay love has ppoted the real problem that ma the movie an expensive box office bomb. “Everyone who ISN’T a homophobic weirdo should go see BROS tonight!

Everyone who ISN’T a homophobic weirdo should go see BROS tonight! “Bros” is an openly gay romantic edy, see, and stars an openly gay man who wrote an openly gay script. And if that isn’t openly gay historic, what is?

HOW BROS RECLAIMS THE FUNNY GAY SEX SCENE

Not a homophobic weirdo, but I am not terted that movie.. Perhaps llg homophonic weirdos isn’t great marketg.

Maybe all the crics were aaid to give you an hont review bee you might ll them homophobic weirdos. Dpe a mass marketg mpaign, distributn 3, 350 theaters natnwi, and boastg of beg the first gay rom- wh a st pletely prised of openly LGBTQ stars, the film was unable to draw dienc. What’s also te is that at one pot a theater cha lled Universal and said they were pullg the trailer bee of the gay ntent.

However, the actor went on to suate that homophobia uld be the source of reluctance for moviegoers as he touted the “uniquely powerful” film that he noted would ronate most wh “queer folks.

COMMENTARY: THE REAL LSON OF ‘BROS’: IT’S OK TO LET GAY ART BOMB

However, not unnoticed was the wild succs of prev gay-centered stori marketed to mass dienc like the 1996 h “The Birdge” which opened ls than 2, 000 theaters and ma $124 ln Amerin theaters (nearly $250 ln when adjted for flatn) and the s “Will & Grace” which ran for eight nsecutive seasons before returng for three more after a more than ten-year hiat. While may be filled wh humor that a wi-rangg dience uld appreciate, BlazeTV host Steve Deace may have summed up the reason for the “Bros” lacklter release when he ntend, “What this likely tells is when homosexualy is packaged as wty and charmg–like the trailblazg Will and Grace– n have wi mastream appeal when done well. What this likely tells is when homosexualy is packaged as wty and charmg — like the trailblazg Will and Grace — n have wi mastream appeal when done well.

Time will tell if the asssment is accurate as the producers are set to release another gay rom-, “Spoiler Alert” December. If you didn’t see the gay rom- Bros theaters durg s openg weekend, you’re not alone. Most folks didn’ acrdg to actor, producer and screenwrer, Billy Eichner, homophobia is to blame for the lack of support of his film that featur an all-LGBTQ+ st.

Eichner, who was clearly upset about the film’s failure, prevly wrote onle that anyone who isn’t “a homophobic weirdo” should go see the movie for the sake of “queer folks who don’t get this opportuny often. ”Don’t look like that pch brandg unterted movie-goers gay-hatg creeps was, distributed by Universal films, was marketed as the first gay romantic edy released by a major Hollywood stud. Everywhere else, though, was a, is homophobia to blame for s box office crash?

‘BROS’ CREATOR BLAM MISSG STRAIGHT DIENC FOR GAY ROM- FLOP

Adults who self-intify as lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr or somethg other than heterosexual has creased to a new high of 7. Therefore, gay, straight or otherwise, ’s safe to assume that folks jt weren’t terted Bros for var, when qutned about the gay them Bros, Universal print of domtic distributn, Jim Orr, chose to foc stead on how “credibly proud” the stud was of the film and the filmmakers. The new gay rom-, Bros, has bombed at the box office.

'BROS' CREATOR BLAM MISSG STRAIGHT DIENC FOR GAY ROM- FLOP

Director Nicholas Stoller and star Billy Eichner, full Nietzschean rsentiment mo, are ltle doubt about why the film flopped: homophobic weirdos refg to go and see .

Settg asi the fact that Bros is a gay entry the genre, the qutn of whether romantic edi n be mercially succsful today is one worth askg. The promiscuo liftyl that the sexual revolutn has promoted, particularly as manifted among gay men, surely ate agast romance. Please don’t blame homophobia for your mercial failure.

I'm a gay screenwrer and I'm feelg very disuraged about lgbtq+ stori film. Touted as the first of s kd — the first gay romantic edy om a major stud — the film performed unr 40% of s expected openg weekend, leavg many to ponr where went wrong. Perhaps by attemptg to appeal to everyone — ”I wanted to feel real to gay men while also beg hilar and accsible to all dienc, ” Eichner told Vogue — you appeal to no one.

IS TROYE SIVAN’S ‘RH’ SEXY FUN OR GAY DETR?

“In gog after the wist dience possible, Bros may have fallen to a marketplace her world — too straight for gay dienc, and too gay for straight on, ” some analysts posed a New York Tim postmortem. A prsure pot quickly arose over the msagg of the film when Universal first touted the film as “the first romantic edy om a major stud about two gay men maybe, possibly, probably stumblg towards love. ” Many, pecially those the queer muny, were put off by the film’s effort to signate self as historic, which disregard a leage of queer cema — a non that has existed for s and reprents a far wir swath of the muny than Bros, a film that, though might tell you otherwise, is ultimately about the love story of two cisgenr whe gay men, and ends wh the pair centerg themselv at a gala tend to celebrate the openg of a queer history mm.