Gay bomb | Milary Wiki | Fandom

Contents:

• IN 1994, THE U.S. MILARY ACTUALLY CONSIRED BUILDG A “GAY BOMB”
• THE GAY BOMB — A WEAPON THAT WAS NEVER PUT TO MOTNISHAN GADKARI·FOLLOWPUBLISHED ILLUMINATION·2 M READ·APR 22--1SHAREPHEROMON THIS BOMB WOULD E SOLDIERS ATTRACTED TO EACH OTHERPHOTO BY JAM ADAMS ON UNSPLASHCAN YOU IMAGE A WEAPON ED MOSTLY FOR DISTRACTN AND NOT KILLG? WELL, AMERI DID E CLOSE TO THIS. THIS WEAPON WAS TERMED ‘THE GAY BOMB’.MAKE LOVE NOT WARIN 1994, THE REARCHERS AT THE WRIGHT LABORATORY OH WERE PELLED TO ASK THEMSELV A UPLE OF QUTNS SUCH AS:IS THERE A WAY TO DISTRACT ENEMY TROOPS LONG ENOUGH TO LNCH AN ATTACK? ALSO, WOULD THERE BE A WAY TO STOP THE TROOPS OM G HARM TO EACH OTHER?THE TERM ‘DISTRACTN’ LED THEM TO THK OF THE ONLY THG — SEX.HENCE, THE REARCHERS PUT TOGETHER A THREE-PAGE PROPOSAL TRODUCG THEIR LATT VENTN — THE GAY BOMB.SCIENCE BEHD THE GAY BOMBTHE GAY BOMB WAS NOTHG BUT A CLOUD OF GAS NTAG A CHEMIL THAT WOULD E ENEMY TROOPS TO BEE GAY. THE PHEROMON THE CHEMIL WOULD E THE TROOPS TO SEEM IRRISTIBLY ATTRACTED TO EACH OTHER.THIS ATTRACTN WOULD E AN URGE SI THEM TO MATE OR MAKE LOVE. BUT TO DO THAT THEY WOULD FIRST HAVE TO SCE EACH OTHER. TH G DISTRACTN.THE ENEMY SOLDIERS WOULD BE BY FLIRTG WH EACH OTHER WHILE THE US TROOPS WOULD MAKE SURE THAT WOULD BE THEIR LAST FLG.NOTE THAT THIS WAS ALL ON PAPER. ONLY A HANDFUL OF STUDI HAVE ACTUALLY PROVED THAT THE GAY BOMB WOULD WORK.BUT REAL LIFE, YOUR SENSE OF SMELL AND BODY ODOR PLAYS A HUGE ROLE YOUR BEG SEXUALLY ATTRACTED TO ANYONE.THE REARCHERS BEHD THE GAY BOMB WON THE IG NOBEL PRIZENEHER WAS THE GAY BOMB TAKEN SERLY NOR WAS EVER MA. BUT THE REARCHERS WHO ME UP WH THIS SANE IA WON THE IG NOBEL PRIZE.DON’T WORRY ’S NOT A SER AWARD. IT’S A PARODY AWARD GIVEN TO UNUAL VENTNS. THE REARCHERS BEHD THE GAY BOMB SURELY TOP THE CHARTS WHEN TO SATIRE.CONCLN
• GAY BOMBS: US SECRET WEAPON PLAN
• HERE’S WHY THE PILOT OF ENOLA GAY HAD NO REGRETS ABOUT DROPPG THE FIRST ATOM BOMB
• GAY BOMB
• MILARY WS IG NOBEL PEACE PRIZE FOR 'GAY BOMB'
• AIR FORCE LOOKED AT SPRAY TO TURN ENEMY GAY

IN 1994, THE U.S. MILARY ACTUALLY CONSIRED BUILDG A “GAY BOMB”

She wore a red sequned drs and my head her hair was bigger than Dolly Parton’s, although is highly likely that uld be me leang to the gay fantasy. While eventually I would e to realise I am also a gay man, long before my gay shame me the shame of beg a boy whose bt iend was a Barbie. The ia of a gay bomb me om a sire to bilate and distract their opponents but not necsarily kill them.

Wikimedia CommonsThe gay bomb was a theoretil cloud of gas that would turn enemy soldiers gay.

THE GAY BOMB — A WEAPON THAT WAS NEVER PUT TO MOTNISHAN GADKARI·FOLLOWPUBLISHED ILLUMINATION·2 M READ·APR 22--1SHAREPHEROMON THIS BOMB WOULD E SOLDIERS ATTRACTED TO EACH OTHERPHOTO BY JAM ADAMS ON UNSPLASHCAN YOU IMAGE A WEAPON ED MOSTLY FOR DISTRACTN AND NOT KILLG? WELL, AMERI DID E CLOSE TO THIS. THIS WEAPON WAS TERMED ‘THE GAY BOMB’.MAKE LOVE NOT WARIN 1994, THE REARCHERS AT THE WRIGHT LABORATORY OH WERE PELLED TO ASK THEMSELV A UPLE OF QUTNS SUCH AS:IS THERE A WAY TO DISTRACT ENEMY TROOPS LONG ENOUGH TO LNCH AN ATTACK? ALSO, WOULD THERE BE A WAY TO STOP THE TROOPS OM G HARM TO EACH OTHER?THE TERM ‘DISTRACTN’ LED THEM TO THK OF THE ONLY THG — SEX.HENCE, THE REARCHERS PUT TOGETHER A THREE-PAGE PROPOSAL TRODUCG THEIR LATT VENTN — THE GAY BOMB.SCIENCE BEHD THE GAY BOMBTHE GAY BOMB WAS NOTHG BUT A CLOUD OF GAS NTAG A CHEMIL THAT WOULD E ENEMY TROOPS TO BEE GAY. THE PHEROMON THE CHEMIL WOULD E THE TROOPS TO SEEM IRRISTIBLY ATTRACTED TO EACH OTHER.THIS ATTRACTN WOULD E AN URGE SI THEM TO MATE OR MAKE LOVE. BUT TO DO THAT THEY WOULD FIRST HAVE TO SCE EACH OTHER. TH G DISTRACTN.THE ENEMY SOLDIERS WOULD BE BY FLIRTG WH EACH OTHER WHILE THE US TROOPS WOULD MAKE SURE THAT WOULD BE THEIR LAST FLG.NOTE THAT THIS WAS ALL ON PAPER. ONLY A HANDFUL OF STUDI HAVE ACTUALLY PROVED THAT THE GAY BOMB WOULD WORK.BUT REAL LIFE, YOUR SENSE OF SMELL AND BODY ODOR PLAYS A HUGE ROLE YOUR BEG SEXUALLY ATTRACTED TO ANYONE.THE REARCHERS BEHD THE GAY BOMB WON THE IG NOBEL PRIZENEHER WAS THE GAY BOMB TAKEN SERLY NOR WAS EVER MA. BUT THE REARCHERS WHO ME UP WH THIS SANE IA WON THE IG NOBEL PRIZE.DON’T WORRY ’S NOT A SER AWARD. IT’S A PARODY AWARD GIVEN TO UNUAL VENTNS. THE REARCHERS BEHD THE GAY BOMB SURELY TOP THE CHARTS WHEN TO SATIRE.CONCLN

The ncept of a “gay bomb” sounds like somethg out of a bad science fictn movie.

5 ln ventn: the gay bomb.

GAY BOMBS: US SECRET WEAPON PLAN

The gay bomb would be a cloud of gas that would be discharged over enemy mps “that ntaed a chemil that would e enemy soldiers to bee gay, and to have their uns break down bee all their soldiers beme irristibly attractive to one another.

Basilly, the pheromon the gas would turn the soldiers gay. The scientists ntued to suggt addns to the gay bomb, cludg aphrodisiacs, and other scents. Thankfully, the gay bomb was only ever theoretil and never put to motn.

HERE’S WHY THE PILOT OF ENOLA GAY HAD NO REGRETS ABOUT DROPPG THE FIRST ATOM BOMB

Like the gay bomb, the creative chemil ias also never me to un. Dpe the drawbacks, for their work such an novative field, the rearchers who nceptualized the gay bomb were award the Ig Nobel Prize, a parody award which celebrat unual scientific achievements that “first make people lgh, and then make them thk. The gay bomb certaly fs the bill for that one.

After readg about the theoretil gay bomb, check out the super real Bat Bomb. The US ary vtigated buildg a "gay bomb", which would make enemy soldiers "sexually irristible" to each other, ernment papers say. The plan for a so-lled "love bomb" envisaged an aphrodisiac chemil that would provoke wispread homosexual behavur among troops, g what the ary lled a "distasteful but pletely non-lethal" blow to morale.

GAY BOMB

On Augt 6, 1945, the Enola Gay dropped Ltle Boy on the Japane cy of Hiroshima.

The Begng or the End claimed the Amerin ary dropped warng leaflets about the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and that the Enola Gay me unr attack om Japane antiaircraft missile fire on s bombg n. Did not drop leaflets warng of the atomic bomb specifilly, though pilots may have dropped more general notic of impendg attacks on Hiroshima, and the Enola Gay did not e unr antiaircraft fire. -based profsnal league to e out as gay.

MILARY WS IG NOBEL PEACE PRIZE FOR 'GAY BOMB'

Michael Sam beme the first openly gay player to be drafted when the then-St. This weapon was termed ‘The Gay Bomb’ Love Not WarIn 1994, the rearchers at The Wright Laboratory Oh were pelled to ask themselv a uple of qutns such as:Is there a way to distract enemy troops long enough to lnch an attack?

The term ‘distractn’ led them to thk of the only thg —, the rearchers put together a three-page proposal troducg their latt ventn — The Gay Bomb.

Science Behd The Gay BombThe Gay Bomb was nothg but a cloud of gas ntag a chemil that would e enemy troops to bee gay. Only a handful of studi have actually proved that The Gay Bomb would real life, your sense of smell and body odor plays a huge role your beg sexually attracted to Rearchers behd The Gay Bomb won the IG Nobel PrizeNeher was The Gay Bomb taken serly nor was ever ma. The rearchers behd The Gay Bomb surely top the charts when to satire.

AIR FORCE LOOKED AT SPRAY TO TURN ENEMY GAY

Gay bombs: US secret weapon planWe’re sorry, this feature is currently unavailable. Air Force B29 bomber, the Enola Gay, took off om the s base Tian, near Guam, and head for the cy of Hiroshima southern Japan.

So when Enola Gay approached at 8. The Enola Gay was 10 away when the blast went off, but still felt the shockwav. But how did the explosn weigh wh the 12 men aboard the Enola Gay who dropped the bomb that day?

The "halosis bomb" and "gay bomb" are rmal nam for two theoretil non-lethal chemil weapons that a Uned Stat Air Force rearch laboratory speculated about producg; the theori volve dischargg female sex pheromon over enemy forc orr to make them sexually attracted to each other. Usg a bra imagg technique, Swedish rearchers have shown that homosexual and heterosexual mal' bras rpond differently to two odors that may be volved sexual aroal, and that the homosexual men rpond the same way as heterosexual women, though uld not be termed whether this was e or effect. [catn need] The study was expand to clu homosexual women; the rults were nsistent wh prev fdgs meang that homosexual women were not as rponsive to male intified odors, while their rponse to female cu was siar to that of heterosexual mal.