I fought for gay rights — but trans activists have stroyed the meang of Pri

Contents:

• I FOUGHT FOR GAY RIGHTS — BUT TRANS ACTIVISTS HAVE STROYED THE MEANG OF PRI
• LBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENR, AND QUEER MUNY
• REPORT: SWATCH GROUP SU COUNTRY THAT ALLEGEDLY SEIZED ITS GAY PRI WATCH

I FOUGHT FOR GAY RIGHTS — BUT TRANS ACTIVISTS HAVE STROYED THE MEANG OF PRI

I’m old enough to have been active gay rights when you uld be arrted some Amerin jurisdictns for a kiss.

Then gay rights emerged, and Pri march — i. The sponsorships were lculated acts, predited on the termatn the pani volved would w more gay ctomers than lose anti-gay ctomers.

Why should gays ntue to be sgled out, even for the purpose of beg celebrated? Beg gay is an attribute, not an acplishment.

LBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENR, AND QUEER MUNY

Then there’s this: Pri Month isn’t jt about gays anymore. It’s about the whole “LGBTQI+” crowd — a “muny” most gays never asked to jo and whose guidg iology mak most of scratch our heads nfn. Ined, we’re the odd posn of seeg what ed to be our movement -opted by activists whose wacky theori about the nature of genr renr such labels as male and female, gay and straight, utterly meangls.

REPORT: SWATCH GROUP SU COUNTRY THAT ALLEGEDLY SEIZED ITS GAY PRI WATCH

Not many people, gay or straight. Why, then, are major firms — the kd that, years ago, were reluctant to dip their to too early to the still-chilly waters of the gay-rights movement — phg this creepy new stuff so eagerly?

And they learned ’s ol to be “queer” — which has nothg to do wh beg gay but means, rather, that one’s inty is, some way, tensn wh mastream norms. Trans, queer, woke: It’s all part of the same iologil grab bag, along wh the weird new termatn to expose kids to drag queens (a ty subset of gay people who have no more bs practicg their craft ont of mors than hookers or morticians).