CHICAGO (AP) — Legislatn that ensur same-sex and terracial marriag are regnized as legal unns appears head for fal approval and Print Joe Bin's signature, a bipartisan agreement that reflects a wir acceptance of gay rights both Congrs and the untry.
Contents:
- EXPLAINER: CONGRS IS ACTG ON GAY, INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE
- HOE PASS BILL PROTECTG GAY AND TERRACIAL MARRIAGE, SENDS TO BIN FOR SIGNATURE
- CONGRS NSIRS DIFYG SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AFTER LONG BATTLE FOR GAY RIGHTS
- CALIFORNIA VOTERS WILL BE ASKED TO REAFFIRM GAY MARRIAGE PROTECTNS ON 2024 BALLOT
- MANY BRONS HAVE CHANGED THEIR MDS ON GAY MARRIAGE
EXPLAINER: CONGRS IS ACTG ON GAY, INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE
Is gay marriage jt like terracial marriage? If you’re agast gay marriage, is that the same as racism? * gay interracial marriage *
Is gay marriage jt like terracial marriage?
HOE PASS BILL PROTECTG GAY AND TERRACIAL MARRIAGE, SENDS TO BIN FOR SIGNATURE
* gay interracial marriage *
If you’re agast gay marriage, is that the same as racism?
The central, tegoril objectn to gay marriage is that same-sex upl n’t produce blogil children together.
CONGRS NSIRS DIFYG SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AFTER LONG BATTLE FOR GAY RIGHTS
The Hoe of Reprentativ on Tuday passed a bill to dify the right to gay marriage the wake of the Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. Wa * gay interracial marriage *
Gay upl n have kids g donated eggs or sperm. Many gay people are already raisg children, and dog jt as well as straight people. Many people thk that this distctn is important enough to whhold the word “marriage” om same-sex upl; I thk those people are beg unjt and obte to the moral realy of homosexual love.
That’s why, om the discrimator’s standpot, ’s more fensible to oppose gay marriage than to oppose terracial marriage.
Recent remarks by a jtice of the top urt had ed some ncerns that gay marriage and terracial marriage uld be overturned by a possible future urt newt ph to dify the right to gay and terracial marriage to law me after the nservative-domated Supreme Court June overturned the nstutnal right to abortn, which had been legal natnwi for four s. Stt ApplewheCHICAGO (AP) — Legislatn that ensur same-sex and terracial marriag are regnized as legal unns appears head for fal approval and Print Joe Bin's signature, a bipartisan agreement that reflects a wir acceptance of gay rights both Congrs and the measure, which would protect the rights of about a half ln married upl, passed the Senate last week and heads to the Hoe this week for near-certa many of the upl whose marriag will be protected, approval of the Rpect for Marriage Act brought a sense of relief and was e for celebratn. That monumental cisn legalized gay marriage natnwi, endg bans 14 stat that still had them.
CALIFORNIA VOTERS WILL BE ASKED TO REAFFIRM GAY MARRIAGE PROTECTNS ON 2024 BALLOT
Virgia, validated state laws that banned marriag between people of different the years after Obergefell, some supporters of gay rights worried the eedom to marry uld one day be revoked, and pursued versns of the Rpect for Marriage Act, said Jon Davidson, senr staff attorney for the ACLU’s LGBTQ & HIV Project and -unsel on there wasn't the urgency or polil will to advance — until this NOW? ” But was the words of a fellow nservative, Jtice Clarence Thomas, that alarmed gay-rights supporters.
”At the same time, the LGBTQ muny has been the target of vlence, Davidson said, notg the recent murrs at a gay nightclub Colorado. Eric Gay/AP. Two gay stunts at the Universy of Mnota wanted to marry, but were told no by the unty clerk bee they were men.
In 1996, then-Senator Joe Bin backed the Defense of Marriage Act banng feral regnn of relatnships between gays and lbians. San Colls (R-Mae), who helped lead the charge to end the ary’s ban on gay and lbian members 2010. Wa, wrten by Jtice Samuel Alo, acced dissentg jtic of tryg to “stoke unfound fear that our cisn will imperil” lgs that legalized the e of ntraceptiv, as well as gay and terracial marriage.
MANY BRONS HAVE CHANGED THEIR MDS ON GAY MARRIAGE
Gay marriage don’t offend me nearly as much as offendg feralism do through this legislatn.
), who attend his son’s gay weddg July jt days after votg agast the earlier versn of the bill, said he would vote “no” aga over relig liberti ncerns, spe releasg a statement that he was “very happy to wele” his “new son--law” to his own fay.