Christian webse signer says she received email requt om same-sex uple but ‘thor’ says he did not send – and is not gay
Contents:
- THE MAN NAMED THE SUPREME COURT’S GAY RIGHTS LG SAYS HE DIDN’T REQUT A WEDDG WEBSE
- WHAT THE SUPREME COURT'S GAY WEDDG WEBSE LG MEANS FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS
- TURNS OUT THE SUPREME COURT'S GAY WEDDG WEBSE CASE MAY BE BASED ON A LIE
THE MAN NAMED THE SUPREME COURT’S GAY RIGHTS LG SAYS HE DIDN’T REQUT A WEDDG WEBSE
* gay website case *
The veracy of a key document a major LGBTQ+ rights se before the US supreme urt has e unr qutn, raisg the possibily that important evince ced might be wrong or even supreme urt is expected to issue a lg on Friday 303 Creative LLC v Elenis, which als wh a challenge to a Colorado law prohibg public-servg bs om discrimatg agast gay people as well as any statements announcg such a su centers on Lorie Smh, a webse signer who do not want to provi her servic for gay weddgs bee of her relig 2016, she says, a gay man named Stewart requted her servic for help wh his upg weddg. Last year, lawyers for Colorado urged the jtic not to take the se bee Smh had not received a requt to make a webse for a gay uple. In a feat for gay rights, the Supreme Court’s nservative majory led Friday, June 30, 2023, Smh who wants to sign weddg webs n refe to work wh same-sex upl (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File).
In a feat for gay rights, the Supreme Court’s nservative majory led Friday, June 30, 2023, Smh who wants to sign weddg webs n refe to work wh same-sex upl. The cisn is a feat for gay rights.
Supreme Court led Friday uld refe to make weddg webs for gay upl ced a requt om a man who says he never asked to work wh requt dispute, om a person intified as “Stewart, ” wasn’t the basis for the feral lawsu filed preemptively seven years ago by web signer Lorie Smh, before she started makg weddg webs. But as the se advanced, was referenced by her attorneys when lawyers for the state of Colorado prsed Smh on whether she had sufficient grounds to revelatn distracts om Smh’s victory at a time when she might have been baskg her w, which is wily nsired a setback for gay rights.
WHAT THE SUPREME COURT'S GAY WEDDG WEBSE LG MEANS FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS
A Colorado web signer who the U.S. Supreme Court led uld refe to make a weddg webse for gay upl had ced a requt om a man who says he never asked to work wh her. * gay website case *
Supreme Court victory after refg to make a gay uple’s weddg ke, cg his Christian fah. Supreme Court led Friday uld refe to make weddg webs for gay upl ced a requt om a man who says he never asked to work wh her. The revelatn distracts om Smh's victory at a time when she might have been baskg her w, which is wily nsired a setback for gay rights.
Supreme Court victory after refg to make a gay uple's weddg ke, cg his Christian fah. "The jtic led 6-3 along iologil l favor of Denver-area web signer Lorie Smh, who ced her Christian beliefs agast gay marriage challengg a Colorado anti-discrimatn law.
TURNS OUT THE SUPREME COURT'S GAY WEDDG WEBSE CASE MAY BE BASED ON A LIE
"Sotomayor add, "By issug this new license to discrimate a se brought by a pany that seeks to ny same-sex upl the full and equal enjoyment of s servic, the immediate, symbolic effect of the cisn is to mark gays and lbians for send-class stat.
A 2015 cisn legalized gay marriage natnwi. A 2020 lg found that a feral law barrg workplace discrimatn protects gay and transgenr ACCOMMODATIONS LAWSmh, who liv the Denver suburb of Ltleton, is an evangelil Christian who has said she believ marriage is only between a man and a woman. She preemptively sued Colorado's civil rights missn and other state officials 2016 bee she said she feared beg punished for refg to serve gay weddgs unr Colorado's public acmodatns lled Friday's lg a victory for all Amerins, addg, "Colorado n't force me or anyone to say somethg we don't believe.
And so on, " Sotomayor 's cisn followed one 2018 which the jtic led favor of a Denver-area baker who refed based on his Christian views to make a weddg ke for a gay acmodatns laws exist many stat, banng discrimatn areas such as hog, hotels, retail bs, rtrants and tnal stutns. AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTThe se may settle a qutn left open 2018: how to rencile claims of relig liberty wh laws barrg discrimatn based on sexual Kirkpatrick for The New York TimWASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed on Tuday to hear an appeal om a Colorado web signer who objects to providg servic for same-sex marriag, returng the jtic to a battleground the culture wars ptg claims of relig eedom agast laws prohibg discrimatn on the basis of sexual urt last nsired the clash 2018, when a siar dispute between a Colorado baker and a gay uple failed to yield a five precise qutn the jtic agreed to ci the new se is “whether applyg a public-acmodatn law to pel an artist to speak or stay silent vlat the ee speech clse of the First Amendment. It ncerns Lorie Smh, who owns a webse sign pany that says serv gay ctomers but tends to lim s weddg-related servic to celebratns of heterosexual unns.