Pros and ns of ndom e among gay and bisexual men as explored via the Inter - PubMed

Contents:

• TO USE OR NOT USE CONDOMS? GAY, BI, QUEER TEEN GUYS TELL US
• WHAT’S THE BT WAY TO E PROTECTN DURG GAY SEX?
• GAY SEX: TWO-THIRDS OF MEN DIDN'T WEAR A CONDOM LAST TIME THEY DID IT
• PROS AND NS OF NDOM E AMONG GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN AS EXPLORED VIA THE INTER
• GAY MEN’S USE OF CONDOMS WH CASUAL PARTNERS DEPENDS ON THE EXTENT OF THEIR PRR ACQUATANCE
• ARE CONDOMS OVER? REARCH AND REALY FOR GAY MEN
• ARE GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN USG CONDOMS AS A PREVENTN METHOD?
• ATRALIAN GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN WHO USE CONDOMS, PREP OR RARELY PRACTISE HIV RISK RCTN WH CASUAL SEX PARTNERS: AN ANALYSIS OF NATNAL, BEHAVURAL SURVEILLANCE DATA, 2017–2018
• CHANG NDOM E BY GAY MEN
• CONDOM E AMONG GAY AND OTHER MEN WHO HAVE SEX WH MEN

TO USE OR NOT USE CONDOMS? GAY, BI, QUEER TEEN GUYS TELL US

Therefore, enuragg gay, bisexual, and queer (GBQ)-intifyg teenage men to e ndoms is an important preventive step.

To read our other blog posts on the same study wh GBQ teenage men, check out: Talkg Onle Can Be Life Changg for Sexual Mory Guys and Why Aren’t Gay, Bi, Queer Teen Guys Gettg Tted For HIV?

A mixed-methods study of ndom e and cisn makg among adolcent gay and bisexual mal.

WHAT’S THE BT WAY TO E PROTECTN DURG GAY SEX?

HIV Among Gay and Bisexual Men. Wh all the news and rearch related to PrEP the days, ’s almost easy for gay men to fet about ndoms for HIV preventn. They still have a role to play protectg the sexual health of gay men—sce they n protect agast STIs addn to HIV.

Sce we are human and tend to not have laboratory-style sex, how well do they actually work realy to prevent HIV for gay men? It’s a qutn I get om time to time at the clic—and I n tell you, the effectivens is different for gay men than is for people havg penis/vaga sex.

GAY SEX: TWO-THIRDS OF MEN DIDN'T WEAR A CONDOM LAST TIME THEY DID IT

The timated effectivens of ndom e for gay men wh HIV-posive partners is 70%—but only for those who report “always” g ndoms. Is there any specific ndom that is bt for e wh homosexual mal? gay.

More than a quarter of gay and bisexual men surveyed by a U.

PROS AND NS OF NDOM E AMONG GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN AS EXPLORED VIA THE INTER

In a new survey of sexual behavr, two-thirds (65 percent) of gay and bisexual men said they didn't e a ndom the last time they had anal sex, wh more than a quarter nsirg themselv to have a "risky sex life, " cludg sex wh partners who are numbers, llected by the U. -based gay men's health chary Gay Men Fight Aids (GMFA), surveyed 500 gay and bisexual men, askg them about the risk volved their sex liv.

"We all measure risk differently, " said David Stuart, well-beg program curator for 56 Dean Street, a London-based health clic specializg servic for gay and bisexual men. For others, risk is measured by rejectn for not beg sexy enough, f enough or tertg enough, " he advent of the HIV-preventn dg PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis, means that gay and bisexual hookup culture, which prevly relied solely on protectn to avoid HIV (the only other optn beg abstence), has changed. Anonymo hookups mean often that gay and bisexual men do not have nversatns about their sexual health beforehand.

Pros and ns of ndom e among gay and bisexual men as explored via the Inter. The purpose of this study was to nduct a survey utilizg Inter technology related to gay and bisexual men's ndom e behavr as an exprsn of safer sexual practic.

GAY MEN’S USE OF CONDOMS WH CASUAL PARTNERS DEPENDS ON THE EXTENT OF THEIR PRR ACQUATANCE

A total of 241 self-intified gay and bisexual men rpond to the qutnnaire a 3-month perd of time. There were 14 variabl found to be signifintly associated wh g a ndom wh primary and sual partners among gay and bisexual men.

Delayed applitn of ndoms wh safer and unsafe sex: factors associated wh HIV risk a muny sample of gay and bisexual men.

Stag of change and ndom e among an Inter sample of gay and bisexual men. Sexual protectn behavr HIV-posive gay men: ttg a modified rmatn-motivatn-behavral skills mol. Issu gay men's health.

ARE CONDOMS OVER? REARCH AND REALY FOR GAY MEN

Sexual health, HIV, and sexually transmted fectns among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex wh men the Uned Stat. AbstractUnprotected anal terurse wh sual partners (UAIC) is the strongt predictor of HIV cince among gay men.

Keywords: HIV, Faiary, HIV disclosure, Unprotected anal terurse sual partners, Gay menIntroductnIncreasgly, many gay men have adopted strategi that they believe mimize the risk of HIV transmissn, such as reliance on sero-sortg, untectable viral load and strategic posng durg unprotected anal terurse (UAI) [1–3]. However, a false sense of tst may crease the risk of HIV transmissn among gay this study, we vtigated men’s nsiratns for not g ndoms wh sual partners. Therefore, we examed the last ocsns of protected and unprotected anal terurse wh sual partners among gay men Atralia who had engaged both UAIC and protected anal terurse wh sual partners (PAIC) the prev 12 months, to intify what differenc there might be the circumstanc of the two sorts of key issu examed this article were:How well do gay men know their sual sex partners?

MethodsWe ed an anonymo onle behavral and attudal survey to vtigate the attus and beliefs about ndom e, and faiary wh and tst their last sual partner and the risks of HIV transmissn among Atralian gay men a large muny-based sample. QutnnairIn addn to qutns about men’s ndom e the prev year and most recent sexual enunters, and faiary wh and tst their sual partner, the onle qutnnaire clud mographic ems, and qutns on sexualy and gay muny engagement.

ARE GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN USG CONDOMS AS A PREVENTN METHOD?

ParticipantsMen were eligible for the study if they were homosexually-intified or had had sex wh another man the prev year, and they lived Atralia. Participants were reced through gay muny events and venu, and onle. 3)Homosexual inty Gay413 (81.

5) Homosexual34 (6. 0)Gay muny volvement Not at all133 (24. 8)Gay iends None19 (3.

ATRALIAN GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN WHO USE CONDOMS, PREP OR RARELY PRACTISE HIV RISK RCTN WH CASUAL SEX PARTNERS: AN ANALYSIS OF NATNAL, BEHAVURAL SURVEILLANCE DATA, 2017–2018

Most intified as gay or bisexual, wh 57.

0% ‘very much’ intifyg as gay. A third said most of their iends were gay and the majory spent at least some ee time wh gay iends. About 30% were at least somewhat volved the gay muny.

[16] examed the associatn between: (i) measur of how well gay men knew their sual sex partners and HIV serostat; and (ii) discsn of ndom e prr to sex and whether they had prevly had sex wh that sual partner. In nsirg the fdgs, there may be differenc between the Atralian ntext, where ttg for HIV is relatively high among gay men, and the suatn other untri.

CHANG NDOM E BY GAY MEN

Also, this was a volunteer nvenience sample and may not be entirely reprentative of all homosexually active men Atralia.

It is difficult to asss the reprentativens of sampl of homosexually active men due to lack of appropriate sexualy ditors populatn based rearch [17]. Nohels, this is a large sample wh strong siari to other sampl obtaed Atralia, cludg the sampl obtaed the Atralian gay men’s behavral surveillance system, data om which have been found to closely predict trends HIV cince wh this populatn [18]. Gay men’s sual sex enunters: discsg HIV and g ndoms.

In a mory of gay men, sexual risk practice dit strategic posng for perceived risk rctn rather than unbridled sex. Use of viral load to negotiate ndom e among gay men Sydney, Atralia.

CONDOM E AMONG GAY AND OTHER MEN WHO HAVE SEX WH MEN

Unprotected anal terurse, risk rctn behavurs, and subsequent HIV fectn a hort of homosexual men. Gay men’s stereotyp about who is HIV fected: a further study.

Posive livg: the sexual liv of seroposive gay and bisexual men.