The 100% Accurate Gay Tt ?️‍?

Contents:

• THE 100% ACCURATE GAY TT ?️‍?
• GOOD LUCK PASSG THIS 31 QUTN TT IF YOU AREN'T GAY
• THE GAY QUTN: CHECK ONE
• AM I GAY? QUIZ – 100% RELIABLE TT
• TOWARD A SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS OF THE GAY QUTN – LOS ANGEL REARCH GROUP

THE 100% ACCURATE GAY TT ?️‍?

Toward A Scientific Analysis of the Gay Qutn, Introductn to Send Prtg. Toward A Scientific Analysis of the Gay Qutn.

So, for example, if a group to a posn on the gay qutn based on feelgs, or supposns, or moralisms, stead of by dog a ncrete vtigatn of the qutn, then that group’s posn nnot be rrect – unls if by luck. (If they did, and if they did so tentnally, then this is a clear iologil viatn to make an exceptn of the gay qutn. Certaly this is te of the anizatns’ approach to the gay qutn.

GOOD LUCK PASSG THIS 31 QUTN TT IF YOU AREN'T GAY

If the anizatns were to be judged solely on their approach to and nclns on the gay qutn, we would say that they do not practice Marxism-Lenism at all.

However, is important to note that they do not approach all qutns as they do the gay qutn. Others, such as NAM, who nclu as we do that gays should not be exclud om munist anizatns, also suffer om the same iologil weakns. It is as workers that we n learn and prove how socialized productn creat the uny of the multi-natnal workg class and the solidary of all workers, male and female, heterosexual and homosexual.

THE GAY QUTN: CHECK ONE

Th we thk that the rrect way to anize gays is primarily as workers, and not as part of a separate gay muny. Gays should be anized the same ways and to the same anizatns as all other workers – at the workplace. Gay liberatn anizatns and mass anizatns of gays are important, but are not the place where gay munists should place their primary efforts and rourc.

This is bee we do not yet have this untry a munist party which is pable of leadg, ordatg and givg directn to stggl the mass movement – be the womens’ movement, the gay rights movement, or the natnal mori’ movement.

It is only after this has been done that munists, unr the directn of the party, should put their primary energi to velopg and workg wh the mass movement, cludg the movement for mocratic rights for gays. Specifilly, our sectn on Material Opprsn of gays is the weakt part of the paper, although we regnize that this is the most ccial element a scientific unrstandg of the qutn.

AM I GAY? QUIZ – 100% RELIABLE TT

We have not sufficiently veloped the relatnship between the gay qutn and the woman qutn. Although seems that historilly gay opprsn is tied time and place to the velopment of private property, the divisn of labor and rultg equaly between men and women, and the velopment of sex rol, further vtigatn needs to be done to prove that historil relatnship and the nclns which flow om .

Another major weakns is that we do not provi a fn of “gayns”. We do not suggt whether and to what extent gayns is a blogil tra that people are born wh, or an acquired, societal tra.

People are begng to fd data on the subjects om pre-historic tim to the prent, focg on the extent to which gayns existed, was allowed to exist, or enuraged, and on the nature and extent of opprsn of gays at different historil perds.

TOWARD A SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS OF THE GAY QUTN – LOS ANGEL REARCH GROUP

Rearch is beg done on the role of blogy and of society the fn of “gayns”. It is this historil and scientific lack of rmatn that mak our paper plete – and that also mak the anti-gay analysis rrect om a strictly scientific standpot.

The stggle for a plete, rrect le on the gay qutn will be protracted and will not be rolved overnight wh snty, perceptual and superficial rmatn.

In our discsn on page 19 of the Soviet Unn’s dramatic reversal the 1930’s (the passg of laws and policy which outlawed abortn and homosexualy and which provid material centiv and support for the creased productn of children), we did not mean to imply that this was a rrect tact for the party to have taken.