The startlg shift Amerin attus toward gays and same-sex marriage is not the rult of chance or random events. More than a quarter century ago, gay strategists laid out a plan to transform the natn—wh astoundg succs.
Contents:
- THE GAY AGENDA BLUEPRT: A PLAN TO TRANSFORM AMERI
- ”REFUGE FROM AMERIKA: A GAY MANIFTO” CONTEXT REVIEW ESSAY
- RELIGN: GAY MANIFTO
THE GAY AGENDA BLUEPRT: A PLAN TO TRANSFORM AMERI
A radil manifto for gay liberatn published by the Marxist cell of the US Gay Liberatn Front 1970. * gay manifesto *
It should also be clear that the are the views of one person, and are termed not only by my homosexualy, but my beg whe, male, middle class.
Humans origally ma homosexualy taboo bee they need every b of energy to produce and raise children: survival of speci was a prry.
The reason so few of are bisexual is bee society ma such a big stk about homosexualy that we got forced to seeg ourselv as eher straight or non-straight. Also, many gays go turned off to the ways men are supposed to act wh women and vice-versa, which is pretty fucked-up. Gays will beg to turn on to women when 1) 's somethg that we do bee we want to, and not bee we should, and 2) when women's liberatn chang the nature of heterosexual relatnships.
”REFUGE FROM AMERIKA: A GAY MANIFTO” CONTEXT REVIEW ESSAY
* gay manifesto *
We ntue to ll ourselv homosexual, not bisexual, even if we do make wh the oppose sex also, bee sayg “Oh, I'm Bi” is a p-out for a gay. We get told 's OK to sleep wh guys as long as we sleep wh women, too, and that's still puttg homosexualy down. So gay women are gog to see thgs differently om gay men; they are gog to feel put down as women, too.
And although some of the ias may be equally relevant to gay women, would be arrogant to prume this to be a manifto for lbians. The existence of a lbian uc wh the New York Gay Liberatn Front has been very helpful challengg male chvism among gay guys, and anti-gay feelgs among women's lib.
RELIGN: GAY MANIFTO
Carl Wtmann's Refuge om Amerika: A Gay Manifto, wrten 1969 and published 1970, reprents a tone the history of the LGBT Movement. * gay manifesto *
(At an early gay liberatn meetg one guy said, “Why don't we ve women's liberatn — they n brg sandwich and ffee. Another is uptightns and hostily to homosexualy that many women have — that is the straight them.
This ia gets extend to male/female, on top/on bottom, spoe/not spoe, heterosexual/homosexual, boss/worker, whe/black and rich/poor. Those of who have been heterosexual marriag too often have blamed our gayns on the breakup of the marriage. Liberatn for gay people is fg for ourselv how and wh whom we live, stead of measurg our relatnship parison to straight on, wh straight valu.
U.K. Prime Mister Rishi Sunak has apologized for the treatment of gay veterans by sayg that a prev ban on LGBTQ+ people servg the U.K. ary was “an appallg failure of the Brish state.” * gay manifesto *
Gay ‘stereotyp’: The straight's image of the gay world is fed largely by those of who have vlated straight rol.
There is a tenncy among ‘homophile’ groups to plore gays who play visible rol — the queens and the nelli. The married guy who mak on the si secretly; the guy who will go to bed once but won't velop any gay relatnships; the pretenr at work or school who chang the genr of the iend he's talkg about; the guy who'll suck ck the bh but won't go to bed. A lot of ‘movement’ typ e on wh a le of sh about homosexuals not beg opprsed as much as blacks or Vietname or workers or women.
Talk about the prry of black liberatn or endg imperialism over and above gay liberatn is jt anti-gay propaganda.