Quick Take Var posts shared on social media platforms claims that Monkeypox is a disease of gay men only that spread amongst men who engage sexual - Fact Check, Health Conspiracy Theory Fact Check, Spread of Disease Fact Check
Contents:
- CAN MONKEYS BE GAY? WHAT HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR PRIMAT CAN TELL US ABOUT THE EVOLUTN OF HUMAN SEXUALY
- CAN ANIMALS BE GAY?
- CAN ANIMALS REALLY BE GAY?
- OPN GAY MEN N FIGHT MONKEYPOX OURSELV — BY CHANGG HOW WE HAVE SEX
- AS MONKEYPOX STRIK GAY MEN, OFFICIALS BATE WARNGS TO LIM PARTNERS
- BEG GAY IS NATURAL: JT ASK BONOBOS (OP-ED)
- MALE LN CGHT “MATG” WH MALE LN… GAY PRI? NOT QUE
- AS MONKEYPOX S GROW, SO DO FEARS OF A RETURN OF GAY BLAME AND STIGMA
CAN MONKEYS BE GAY? WHAT HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR PRIMAT CAN TELL US ABOUT THE EVOLUTN OF HUMAN SEXUALY
Anyone n get or spread monkeypox, but a “notable actn of s” the latt global outbreak are happeng among gay and bisexual men, the US Centers for Disease Control and Preventn said Monday. * can monkeys be gay *
Recent observatns of homosexual behavr male spir monkeys adds to our knowledge of the behavrs and may help answer qutns about the evolutnary functns homosexual behavrs may play, as well as allow to nsir if other animals have sexual orientatns siar to the inti that humans nstct. Although is difficult to draw nclns om such few observatns, Bia and lleagu nsir how the behavrs f wh two petg hypoth for homosexual behavr: the 1) regulatn of social relatnships hypothis and 2) the tensn-regulatn hypothis.
Such hypoth, rived om rearch on baboons and bonobos, suggt that homosexual behavrs may eher be a means of strengtheng allianc or fg a tense suatn. Most studi of homosexual behavr animals suggt that is a flexible rponse to social or mographic ndns, rather than emergg om dividual orientatns.
While poor TU may be a b isolated his preference for mal among his spir monkey brethren, at least he do not experience the prejudic that gay humans experience.
CAN ANIMALS BE GAY?
* can monkeys be gay *
” But the journal that published the paper, Blogy Letters, sent out a prs release a few days after the California Supreme Court legalized gay marriage.
CAN ANIMALS REALLY BE GAY?
In 1999, Bagemihl published “Blogil Exuberance, ” a book that pulled together a lossal amount of prev piecemeal rearch and showed how blogists’ bias had margalized animal homosexualy for the last 150 years — sometim nocently enough, sometim an eptn of anthropomorphic disgt.
OPN GAY MEN N FIGHT MONKEYPOX OURSELV — BY CHANGG HOW WE HAVE SEX
Given this big umbrella of theory, the very existence of homosexual behavr animals n feel a ltle like imperable nonsense, somethg a rearcher uld spend years bangg his or her head agast the wall liberatg.
AS MONKEYPOX STRIK GAY MEN, OFFICIALS BATE WARNGS TO LIM PARTNERS
The difficulty of that challenge, more than any implic or explic homophobia, may be why past blogists skirted the THE LAST DECADE, however, Pl Vasey and others have begun velopg new hypoth based on actual, prolonged observatn of different animals, cipherg the ways given homosexual behavrs may have evolved and the evolutnary role they might play wh the ntext of dividual speci. So far, the only real ncln this relatively small body of lerature seems to pot to, llectively, is a kd of flatg, meta-ncln: a sgle explanatn of homosexual behavr animals may not be possible, bee thkg of “homosexual behavr animals” as a sgle scientific subject might not make much sense.
BEG GAY IS NATURAL: JT ASK BONOBOS (OP-ED)
But we’re quick to nceive of that great range of activi the way most handily tracks to our anthropomorphic pot of view: put crassly, all those different animals jt seem to be dog gay sex stuff wh one another. ”Somethg siar may be happeng wh what we perceive to be homosexual sex an array of animal speci: we may be groupg together a big grab bag of behavrs based on only a superficial siary. The Stanford blogist Joan Roughgarn told me to thk of all the animals as “multaskg” wh their private ’s also possible that some homosexual behavrs don’t provi a nventnal evolutnary advantage; but neher do they upend everythg we know about blogy.
MALE LN CGHT “MATG” WH MALE LN… GAY PRI? NOT QUE
Young found the assumptn offensive — not bee she was beg mistaken for gay, but bee she was beg mistaken for a bad scientist; the people seemed to prume that her rearch was promised by a personal agenda.
AS MONKEYPOX S GROW, SO DO FEARS OF A RETURN OF GAY BLAME AND STIGMA
Several people I spoke to told me their own sexual inti eher helped spur or mata their tert the topic; Bce Bagemihl argued that gay and lbian people are “often better equipped to tect heterosexist bias when vtigatg the subject simply bee we enunter so equently our everyday liv.
” He is gay, he add, but that fact didn’t seem to tract om his RETROSPECT, the big, sloshg stew of anthropomorphic analys that Young’s paper provoked the culture uldn’t have been ls surprisg. For whatever reason, we’re prone to seeg animals — pecially animals that appear to be gay — as reflectns, mols and foils of ourselv; we’re extraordarily, and sometim irratnally, vted a few months before I vised Kaena Pot, two pengus at the San Francis Zoo beme the latt a tradn of ptive same-sex pengu upl makg global headl. And while he strsed that there is no scientific way of termg if animals are “gay, ” bee the word nnot a sexual orientatn, not jt a behavr, he also noted that, beg the San Francis Zoo, “there’s fely a lot of opn here, ternally, that we give and ll the pengus gay.