LGBTQ history often foc on the hero. The creators of the Bad Gays podst expla their missn to fill the gaps.
Contents:
- LAWRENCE OF ARABIA WAS A GAY MISF WHO CREATED A NEW TYPE OF WARFARE AND HELPED SHAPE THE MIDDLE EAST
- BOOK REVIEW: WAS LAWRENCE GAY ARABIA?
- WHY WE NEED TO GET TO KNOW THE “BAD GAYS” OF HISTORY
LAWRENCE OF ARABIA WAS A GAY MISF WHO CREATED A NEW TYPE OF WARFARE AND HELPED SHAPE THE MIDDLE EAST
The ascetic soldier and wrer has often been scribed as a homosexual. 'It was never clear whether he was homosexual or not, ' Wilson said.
What many sual fans might not know is Lawrence was almost certaly homosexual. Even now, whether he was gay or perhaps asexual is up for bate. Lawrence's sexualy has been the subject of much bate, wh the suggtn first ma by the thor Richard Aldgton that he may have been gay.
BOOK REVIEW: WAS LAWRENCE GAY ARABIA?
The Gay Love Letters of Lawrence of Arabia". Excerpts om My Dear Boy: Gay Love Letters through the Centuri, eded by Rictor Norton.
Lawrence of Arabia was a gay misf who created a new type of warfare and helped shape the Middle EastThomas Edward Lawrence had a thirst for adventure and is known as the foundg father of guerrilla warfareLawrence of Arabia the 1920sLawrence of Arabia’s almost mythil taste for adventure was driven by a tormented need to prove himself. But then the explorer, soldier and thor of Seven Pillars of Wisdom was, a new book says, driven by an obssive need to prove himself bee he was born illegimate and gay. “There were qutns about whether he was ‘normal’ bee he was gay.
He was a reprsed homosexual and veloped sado-masochistic disorr. Often recent years, the life and achievements of Lawrence have been somewhat overshadowed by ntroversial claims published posthumo bgraphi ncerng his sexual orientatn, accatns that he had been a closet or self-reprsed homosexual. In the wake of his beg immortalized the 1962 David Lean classic “Lawrence of Arabia” a host of other bgraphers ro Aldgton’s at tails, makg the tillatg claim that he had been both homosexual and sadomasochistic.
WHY WE NEED TO GET TO KNOW THE “BAD GAYS” OF HISTORY
Prisons and garrisons often had personnel who specialized this abe, although there was nothg homosexual about . The Turkish soldiers perpetratg this war crime certaly never nsired themselv gay, like male rapists prison the act has nothg to do wh the sexual orientatn of the attacker or victim. Then as now the fear of beg labelled homosexual as a rult of such disclosure was a legimate fear, society havg the tenncy of blamg the victim of sexual asslt rather than the perpetrator.
Homosexualy was a taboo subject at that time, same sex rape was even more taboo. The spicn Lawrence was homosexual is likely to have been a natural by-product of his shockg disclosure, some rears fdg a homoerotic unrtone to his retellg of events.
Then as now few unrstood the cint s historic ntext, the nsens beg only homosexuals are victims of same sex rape, that a man n protect himself and if he’s raped ’s bee he wanted to be.