Librari n serve lbian, gay, bisexual, and transgenr (LBGTQ) people by ensurg that this populatn is reflected library llectns and provid wh servic at the library. As a populatn which is often the subject of discrimatn and harassment, gay, lbian, bisexual, and transgenr people n benef om the accs to rmatn which librari provi and the sense of muny which library programs n help foster. It is important to note that the LGBTQ populatn is diverse, spanng age groups, ethnic and racial groups, soc-enomic groups, and personal inti.
Contents:
- WISNS MIDDLE SCHOOL FEATUR 'THIS BOOK IS GAY' LIBRARY, STIRRG ONLE OUTRAGE
- GAY LIB V. UNIVERSY OF MISSOURI, 416 F. SUPP. 1350 (W.D. MO. 1976)
- DANCG THE GAY LIB BLU
- GAY_LIB
- FORMER STUNT LEARS REFLECT ON 1970S BATTLE FOR MISSOURI TO REGNIZE GAY STUNT GROUP
WISNS MIDDLE SCHOOL FEATUR 'THIS BOOK IS GAY' LIBRARY, STIRRG ONLE OUTRAGE
The ntroversial tle scrib genalia, gay sex and rmatn about the e of homosexual datg apps. * the gay lib *
Prented to the Court the ntext of this se is the qutn of the legal right of homosexuals to form a stunt anizatn and obta Universy regnn of as a mp anizatn. History and Facts of the CaseFebary 25, 1971, marks the begng of an attempt on the part of a small group llg self Gay Lib to ga formal regnn as a stunt anizatn at the Universy of Missouri at Columbia, Missouri.
On that date, Gay Lib submted three documents to the Missouri Stunts Associatn (hereafter referred to as the MSA): (1) a petn for regnn on the forms provid for that purpose by the MSA, (2) a proposed nstutn and by-laws, and (3) a statement of the purpos of the proposed *1354 anizatn. [1] Gay Lib's applitn for regnn was given ial nsiratn by the Rul Commtee of the MSA Senate, which approved and remend that the MSA Senate also grant approval. On November 22, 1971, durg the perd that s petn was before SOGA but not yet unr active nsiratn, Gay Lib submted a revised statement of purpos[2] which add tail to the ial brief statement.
GAY LIB V. UNIVERSY OF MISSOURI, 416 F. SUPP. 1350 (W.D. MO. 1976)
Gay Lib v. Universy of Missouri, 416 F. Supp. 1350 (W.D. Mo. 1976) se opn om the US District Court for the Wtern District of Missouri * the gay lib *
Lansford: "On December 22, 1971, the Universy Commtee on Stunt Organizatns, Government and Activi, meetg regular ssn, passed and submted to me a motn llg for the approval of Gay Lib as a regnized stunt anizatn. The very sence of the group their stated purpose is to study the legal and social posn of the state vis-a-vis the issue of homosexualy, an issue nsired to be of val ncern to a small proportn of our stunt body and of ncern generally terms of social attus and social rponse. First, the specific history relative to the problems of homosexualy that is unique to this Universy reprents a pot of parture for any specific discsn.
On December 6, 1972, Edward Thelen, who had replaced Edw Hutchs as Dean of Stunt Affairs, sent a memo to Dave Markee, Director of Stunt Life, exprsg his belief that the Commtee on Sexual Freedom was a "subterfuge for acplishg the regnn (of Gay Lib) vetoed by Dean Hutchs" and directg Markee to refe to act on requts om the Commtee on Sexual Freedom. The 290 page transcript of the Augt 13, 1973, hearg reveals that both the Universy and Gay Lib adduced a wi range of evince on three ma issu: (1) the procral steps taken by Gay Lib to ga regnn at the Universy of Missouri at Columbia, (2) whether homosexualy is normal or abnormal and (3) whether Universy regnn of a homosexual anizatn would produce creased vlatns of the Missouri Sodomy Law.
DANCG THE GAY LIB BLU
Dancg the Gay Lib Blu by Arthur Bell, 1971, Simon and Schter edn, Hardver English * the gay lib *
There was both lay and expert ttimony on such subjects as the history of the Gay Lib movement, whether i were standard homosexual practice, the alleged homosexual propensi of a mass murrer Hoton then much the news, and the trimental effects on children of "mothers who are overly protective or hostile and rejectg or clgg. However, fdgs 14-25 alt wh the qutns of what homosexualy is, the relatnship of homosexual practic to the Missouri Sodomy Statute and the potential impact of Universy regnn of Gay Lib.
GAY_LIB
In 1971, a homosexual stunt anizatn known as Gay Liberatn or Gay Lib requted and was nied regnn at the Universy of Missouri-Columbia. For the next seven years, Gay Lib members would work their way through a system of appeals and urt s until they were fally award regnn April 1978. This was not… * the gay lib *
Coil nclud that "formal regnn by the Universy of Gay Lib will "(1) give a formal stat to and tend to rerce the personal inti of the homosexual members of those anizatns and will perpetuate and expand an abnormal way of life, unls ntrary to their tentn as stated their wrten purpos, the homosexual members make a ncerted effort to seek treatment, regnize homosexualy as abnormal and attempt to cease their homosexual practic; "(2) tend to e latent or potential homosexuals who bee members to bee overt homosexuals; "(3) tend to expand homosexual behavr which will e creased vlatns of sectn 563. E., the sick and abnormal unselg others who are siarly ill and abnormal; and "(5) nstute an implied approval by the Universy of the abnormal homosexual life-style as a normal way of life and would be so unrstood by many stunts and other members of the public, even though, and spe the fact that, the Universy's regulatns for stunt anizatns provi that regnn of an anizatn by the Universy do not nstute approval or endorsement of the anizatn's aims or activi.
The gay lib movement as exemplified by the Gay Lib Organizatn at UMC and the Gay People's Unn at UMKC is premised upon homosexualy beg normal behavr, ntrary to the further fdgs here. A homosexual is one who seeks to satisfy his or her sexual sir by practicg some or all of the followg: fellat, cunnilg, masturbatn, anal eroticism and perhaps other ways.
Persons who e to adolcence or young adulthood unaware that they have homosexual tennci, but who have fears of sexual relatns wh a member of the oppose sex.
FORMER STUNT LEARS REFLECT ON 1970S BATTLE FOR MISSOURI TO REGNIZE GAY STUNT GROUP
The dividual platiffs, all members of the Executive Board of Gay Lib, sue on their own behalv and on behalf of Gay Lib and all members thereof, as a class unr Rule 23. Sendly, although as a non-stunt Egglton may not be a "member" of Gay Lib, he may, as a member of the Universy staff "participate the activi of stunt anizatns to the extent that he ems proper and s members sire. Defendants also move to add as platiffs all members of Gay Lib, apparently ntendg that the members are few number, and so n be named dividually to avoid the necsy for a class actn.
2 on behalf of Gay Lib and s members, bee Gay Lib already stands before this Court as an unrporated associatn fully petent to reprent s own tert, which by fn are the terts of s members. The platiffs before this Court are, therefore, Lawrence Egglton, Darrell Napton, Sarah Maamara, Doug Hudson and Gay Lib, an unrporated associatn. This Court fds that nonregnn prevented Gay Lib om beg eligible to e Universy facili for meetgs and to receive support out of stunt activi money.
The Determative Qutn and the Pertent EvinceThe cril and cisive qutn of whether or not the Universy of Missouri has met s heavy burn of jtifyg s cisn not to regnize Gay Lib is a close one on the evince adduced at the trial. Harold Moser Voth, [37] a highly qualified medil expert the homosexual field ttified on behalf of the fendants at the evintiary hearg before the Honorable Cullen Coil as follows:. I will ask you, doctor, if you have an opn based upon a reasonable gree of medil certaty whether the regnn of the group scribed and nnected wh the (Gay Lib) statement of purpose would tend to e the state laws of Missouri on sodomy to be broken?