Contents:
- FLIPPER CLEARED! DOLPHS ARE NOT GAY OR BISEXUAL RAPISTS AFTER ALL
- CAN ANIMALS BE GAY?
- MORE GAY DOLPHS OBSERVED OFF COAST OF WTERN ATRALIA
- GAY ANIMALS: ALTERNATE LIFTYL THE WILD
- 11 ANIMAL SPECI THAT PROVE BEG GAY IS NATURAL
- DPE GAY-TEAMMATE POLL, ONLY TAK A FEW TO E PROBLEMS
- ARE DOLPHS A GAY SYMBOL
FLIPPER CLEARED! DOLPHS ARE NOT GAY OR BISEXUAL RAPISTS AFTER ALL
Exampl: bisexual and exclively gay dolphs (MSN); male dolphs are bisexual, US scientists claim (Atralia's News Ltd); and male bottlenose dolphs engage extensive bisexualy (ZeeNews, India) reports appear to be follow-ups to an article on that said male bottlenose dolphs engaged extensive bisexualy, bed wh perds of exclive allegatn was clud Disvery's otherwise reasonable acunt of an amic study to the behavur of 120 or so adult dolphs Wtern Atralia led by Profsor Richard Connor om the Universy of Massachetts and Dr Bill Sherw of the Universy of New South the gay-bisexual-rapist dolph story turns out to be bunkum. Zoologists are disverg that homosexual and bisexual activy is not unknown wh the animal and Silo, two male chstrap pengus at New York's Central Park Zoo have been separable for six years now. Filmmakers recently went search of homosexual wild animals as part of a Natnal Geographic Ultimate Explorer documentary about the female's role the matg game.
CAN ANIMALS BE GAY?
"Well, perhaps, a roundabout way, they are seekg mal, suggts primatologist Amy argu that female maqu may enhance their social posn through homosexual timacy which turn fluenc breedg succs. Already, s of animal homosexualy have been ced succsful urt s brought agast stat like Texas, where gay sex was, until recently, scientists say we should be wary of referrg to animals when nsirg what's acceptable human society. For stance, fantici, as practiced by lns and many other animals, isn't somethg people, gay or straight, generally approve of HomosexualySo how far n we go g animals to help unrstand human homosexualy?
"The bottom le is that anythg that happens other primat, and particularly other ap, is likely to have strong evolutnary ntuy wh what happens humans, " he says the bonobo's e of homosexual activy for social bondg is a possible example, addg, "One of the ma arguments for human homosexual behavr is that helps bond male groups together, particularly where a group of dividuals are pennt on each other, as they might be huntg or warfare. However, as Dunbar adms, there's a long way to go before the of homosexualy humans are fully said, "Nobody's really vtigated this issue thoroughly, bee 's so polilly sensive. Wh most speci, homosexual sex has been documented only sporadilly, and there appear to be few s of dividual animals who engage exclively.
” But the journal that published the paper, Blogy Letters, sent out a prs release a few days after the California Supreme Court legalized gay marriage. ” A gay rights advote e-mailed Young, askg her to fly a rabow flag above each female-female nt, to intify them and show solidary. In 1999, Bagemihl published “Blogil Exuberance, ” a book that pulled together a lossal amount of prev piecemeal rearch and showed how blogists’ bias had margalized animal homosexualy for the last 150 years — sometim nocently enough, sometim an eptn of anthropomorphic disgt.
MORE GAY DOLPHS OBSERVED OFF COAST OF WTERN ATRALIA
Given this big umbrella of theory, the very existence of homosexual behavr animals n feel a ltle like imperable nonsense, somethg a rearcher uld spend years bangg his or her head agast the wall liberatg.
GAY ANIMALS: ALTERNATE LIFTYL THE WILD
The difficulty of that challenge, more than any implic or explic homophobia, may be why past blogists skirted the THE LAST DECADE, however, Pl Vasey and others have begun velopg new hypoth based on actual, prolonged observatn of different animals, cipherg the ways given homosexual behavrs may have evolved and the evolutnary role they might play wh the ntext of dividual speci. So far, the only real ncln this relatively small body of lerature seems to pot to, llectively, is a kd of flatg, meta-ncln: a sgle explanatn of homosexual behavr animals may not be possible, bee thkg of “homosexual behavr animals” as a sgle scientific subject might not make much sense. But we’re quick to nceive of that great range of activi the way most handily tracks to our anthropomorphic pot of view: put crassly, all those different animals jt seem to be dog gay sex stuff wh one another.
”Somethg siar may be happeng wh what we perceive to be homosexual sex an array of animal speci: we may be groupg together a big grab bag of behavrs based on only a superficial siary.
The Stanford blogist Joan Roughgarn told me to thk of all the animals as “multaskg” wh their private ’s also possible that some homosexual behavrs don’t provi a nventnal evolutnary advantage; but neher do they upend everythg we know about blogy. Young’s hband, a blogil nsultant, was actually an thor of the paper, along wh Brenda Zn (who is also not gay, for what ’s worth). Young found the assumptn offensive — not bee she was beg mistaken for gay, but bee she was beg mistaken for a bad scientist; the people seemed to prume that her rearch was promised by a personal agenda.
11 ANIMAL SPECI THAT PROVE BEG GAY IS NATURAL
Several people I spoke to told me their own sexual inti eher helped spur or mata their tert the topic; Bce Bagemihl argued that gay and lbian people are “often better equipped to tect heterosexist bias when vtigatg the subject simply bee we enunter so equently our everyday liv. ” He is gay, he add, but that fact didn’t seem to tract om his RETROSPECT, the big, sloshg stew of anthropomorphic analys that Young’s paper provoked the culture uldn’t have been ls surprisg. For whatever reason, we’re prone to seeg animals — pecially animals that appear to be gay — as reflectns, mols and foils of ourselv; we’re extraordarily, and sometim irratnally, vted a few months before I vised Kaena Pot, two pengus at the San Francis Zoo beme the latt a tradn of ptive same-sex pengu upl makg global headl.
DPE GAY-TEAMMATE POLL, ONLY TAK A FEW TO E PROBLEMS
And while he strsed that there is no scientific way of termg if animals are “gay, ” bee the word nnot a sexual orientatn, not jt a behavr, he also noted that, beg the San Francis Zoo, “there’s fely a lot of opn here, ternally, that we give and ll the pengus gay. ” Acrdg to the Amerin Library Associatn, there have been more requts for librari to ban “And Tango Mak Three” every year than any other book the untry, three years animals do — what’s perceived to be “natural” — seems to rry a strange moral potency: ’s out there, irrefutably, as eher a validatn or a nunciatn of our own behavr, pendg on how you happen to feel about homosexualy and about nature. Durg the Victorian era, observatns of same-sex behavr swans and sects were held up as evince agast the moraly of homosexualy humans, sce at the dawn of dtrialism and Darwism, people were vted seeg themselv as more civilized than the “lower animals.
” Robert Mugabe and the Nazis have employed the same reasong, as did the 1970s anti-gay csar Ana Bryant, who, Bce Bagemihl not, claimed an terview that “even barnyard animals don’t do what homosexuals do” and was unmoved when the terviewer poted out what actually happens barnyards. Gert Glossip has ed Bagemihl’s book to create a celebratory, terpretive gay animal tour of the Alai zoo, marketed to gay and lbian tourists. The book has also been ced a brief filed for the 2003 Supreme Court se that overturned a Texas state ban on sodomy and, siarly, a legislative bate on the floor of the Brish Esseks, director of the Lbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgenr Project at the Amerin Civil Liberti Unn, told me he has never rporated facts about animal behavr to a legal argument about the rights of human begs.
ARE DOLPHS A GAY SYMBOL
”) That beg said, Esseks told me, polls show that Amerins are more likely to discrimate agast gays and lbians if they thk homosexualy is “a choice. Those wantg to discrimate agast gays and lbians may have roped the rt of to an argument over what’s “natural” jt by assertg for so long that homosexualy is not. Animal rearch monstratg the supposed “naturalns” of homosexualy has typilly been embraced by gay rights activists and has put their opponents on the fensive.
At the same time, rearch terpreted — or, maybe more often, misterpreted — to be close to ppotg that naturalns a specific “gay gene” n make people on both sis anx a totally different 2007, for stance, the Universy of Illois at Chigo nroblogist David Featherstone and several lleagu, while searchg for new dg treatments for Lou Gehrig’s disease, happened upon a disvery: a specific prote mutatn the bra of male u fli ma the fli try to have sex wh other mal. ” (Earlier that year, PETA and the former tennis star Marta Navratilova, among others, were wagg siar attacks on a scientific study of gay sheep, prumg was a precursor to velopg a “treatment” for shuttg off homosexualy human fet.
” Like many who reached out to Featherstone, the woman and her dghter seemed to take for granted that homosexualy was born — natural.