A gay Rsian uple who had their marriage regnised by explog a legal loophole the untry's legislatn now face charg for "tentnal damage to passports".
Contents:
- GAY MARRIAGE THE US SUPREME COURT: OBERGEFELL V. HODG
- A LAWYER THE HISTORIC SAME-SEX MARRIAGE SE SAYS THE SHEER NUMBER OF GAY MARRIED UPL WILL MAKE HARD FOR THE SUPREME COURT TO ROLL BACK MARRIAGE EQUALY
- GAY MARRIAGE
- US SUPREME COURT L GAY MARRIAGE IS LEGAL NATNWI
- RSIA ACCINTALLY REGNIZ GAY MARRIAGE FOR FIRST TIME, COUPLE SAYS
- RSIAN GAY COUPLE WHO HAD MARRIAGE REGNISED NOW FACE CHARG
GAY MARRIAGE THE US SUPREME COURT: OBERGEFELL V. HODG
The road to full marriage equaly for same-sex upl the Uned Stat was paved wh setbacks and victori. The landmark 2015 Supreme Court se Obergefell v. Hodg ma gay marriage legal throughout the untry. * gay marriage case number *
In 1981, the San Francis Board of Supervisors passed an ordance that allowed homosexual upl and unmarried heterosexual upl to register for domtic partnership, which also granted hospal visatn rights and other benefs.
Bh that would outlaw same-sex marriag the whole untry, ten typilly nservative tat along wh Oregon enacted state-level bans on gay marriag. In 2010, Massachetts, the first state to legalize gay marriage, found Sectn 3 of DOMA that fed marriage as a unn between one man and one woman to be unnstutnal, 2013, Uned Stat v. By 2015 (the year Obergefell was cid) thirty-six stat already issued marriage licens to same-sex upl and more than 20 unti around the world had already legalized gay marriage, startg wh the Netherlands 2000.
A LAWYER THE HISTORIC SAME-SEX MARRIAGE SE SAYS THE SHEER NUMBER OF GAY MARRIED UPL WILL MAKE HARD FOR THE SUPREME COURT TO ROLL BACK MARRIAGE EQUALY
Judge Heyburn held that “homosexual persons nstute a quasi-spect class, ” and clared that Kentucky’s law banng same-sex marriag vlat the Equal Protectn Clse of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Uned Stat Constutn. Hodg over whether or not gay marriage is a right guaranteed by the US Constutn, and whether or not gay marriag performed stat where has been legalized mt be regnized stat which ban the practice. On June 26, 2015, the Court led 5-4 that gay marriage is a nstutnal right, meang that all 50 stat mt allow and that all existg bans are valid.
GAY MARRIAGE
The cisn nclud a s-long battle over whether gay marriage should be legalized. All four stat are vered by the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circu, which upheld the stat’ gay marriage bans Nov.
2014, th endg a n of succs for the gay marriage movement durg which more than 40 state and feral urts overturned same-sex marriage bans. The briefs filed support of gay marriage clud one by 370 small and large bs, one by 300 Republin officeholrs and activists, and one filed by a group of former high-rankg civilian Defense Department personnel. The briefs filed opposn to gay marriage clu those by stat that have banned gay marriage, along wh briefs filed by var nservative policians, scholars, and anizatns.
US SUPREME COURT L GAY MARRIAGE IS LEGAL NATNWI
Prottors for and agast gay marriage assembled nearby, wh at least one anti gay marriage prottor managg to get a seat si.
After yellg “If you support gay marriage you will burn hell” while the arguments were progrs, the man was dragged screamg out of the urtroom. Kennedy exprsed a reticence to overri a fn of marriage that “has been wh for lennia, ” yet suggted that gay upl uld have a “noble purpose” wishg to marry.
RSIA ACCINTALLY REGNIZ GAY MARRIAGE FOR FIRST TIME, COUPLE SAYS
The New York Tim reported that Kennedy appeared “more emotnal and emphatic when he ma the se for same-sex marriage, ” givg “gay rights advot reason for optimism.
Roberts told lawyers argug on behalf of gay marriage proponents that “you’re not seekg to jo that stutn, you’re seekg to change what the stutn is.
As the State self mak marriage all the more prec by the signifince attach to , excln om that stat has the effect of teachg that gays and lbians are unequal important rpects. It means gays and lbians for the State to lock them out of a central stutn of the Natn’s society. The imposn of this disabily on gays and lbians serv to disrpect and subordate them.
RSIAN GAY COUPLE WHO HAD MARRIAGE REGNISED NOW FACE CHARG
Marriage did not e about as a rult of a polil movement, disvery, disease, war, relig doctre, or any other movg force of world history—and certaly not as a rult of a prehistoric cisn to exclu gays and lbians.
Court Appears on Cp of Declarg Right to Gay Marriage, ”, Apr.