Many sadly rejoiced at headl, "The Supreme Court legaliz gay marriage!" How did the Jtic le rrectly, if marriage isn't the Constutn?
Contents:
- A BRIEF HISTORY OF GAY RIGHTS AT THE SUPREME COURT
- THE SUPREME COURT RULGS THAT HAVE SHAPED GAY RIGHTS AMERI
- WILL THE SUPREME COURT TARGET NTRACEPTN AND GAY RIGHTS NEXT?
- THE SUPREME COURT’S BLSG OF ANTI-LGBTQ+ DISCRIMATN WILL HNT GAY COUPL
A BRIEF HISTORY OF GAY RIGHTS AT THE SUPREME COURT
On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court livered a monumental victory for gay rights, requirg that all stat license marriag between people of the same sex. Tha… * gay intimacy supreme court *
Supreme Court livered a monumental victory for gay rights, requirg that all stat license marriag between people of the same sex. As recently as 1986, for example, the urt found no nstutnal protectn agast laws banng nsensual homosexual sex.
Here is a brief history of gay-rights cisns at the urt.
A Los Angel postmaster clared ONE: The Homosexual Magaze to be obscene and refed to liver . This was the first Supreme Court se to al wh homosexualy, and also the first victory there for gay rights.
THE SUPREME COURT RULGS THAT HAVE SHAPED GAY RIGHTS AMERI
Is firg someone for beg gay or transgenr illegal unr Tle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars employers om discrimatg “bee , lor, relign, sex, or natnal orig”? The Supreme Court will take up that qutn October. At issue is whether lbian, gay, bisexual, and transgenr people have a right to be treated equally the workplace, sce discrimatg agast them is extribly “bee of sex.” The qutn has divid lower urts, often along unpredictable l. * gay intimacy supreme court *
A police officer Geia observed a man havg nsensual homosexual sex his own bedroom, an act which was then illegal there.
The man was charged, and his se ma to the Supreme Court, where, a 5-4 loss for gay rights, the urt found no nstutnal protectn for acts of sodomy. After Colorado rints voted for a state nstutnal amendment precludg any laws protectg dividuals based on sexual orientatn, homosexuals and other groups sued. The Boy Suts oted a former Eagle Sut om his posn as an assistant sutmaster when the anizatn found out that he was gay.
Kennedy, by this pot a well-known champn of gay rights, aga livered the opn of the urt. Cofounr Sylvia Rivera (center), Bebe Srpato (right), and other activists advoted for legal protectns for trans, genr nonnformg, and gay people, and veloped mutual aid worksto provi food and Stephens was a succsful funeral director for R.
WILL THE SUPREME COURT TARGET NTRACEPTN AND GAY RIGHTS NEXT?
The Court led favor of gay rights as early as 1958. But s cisns haven't always sid wh the LGBT muny. * gay intimacy supreme court *
” Donald Zarda tght skydivg for fifteen years but was fired by Altu Exprs on Long Island 2010 when a female ctomer plaed that he had told her he was gay to make her feel ls anx about beg strapped together wh him durg a tanm skydive.
Gerald Bostock lost his job as an advote for children a Geia juvenile urt 2013 when his employers learned that he was playg a gay softball league.
All three filed su allegg that their employers had discrimated agast transgenr or gay has nothg whatever to do wh one’s abily to direct funerals, teach skydivg, or advote for kids. Employment cisns should be ma on mer, not group-based is firg someone for beg gay or transgenr illegal unr Tle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars employers om discrimatg “bee of…race, lor, relign, sex, or natnal orig”?
THE SUPREME COURT’S BLSG OF ANTI-LGBTQ+ DISCRIMATN WILL HNT GAY COUPL
The Supreme Court led that feral law forbids job discrimatn based on sexual orientatn and transgenr stat, a major victory for advot of gay rights — and a surprise om an creasgly nservative urt. * gay intimacy supreme court *
) At issue is whether lbian, gay, bisexual, and transgenr people have a right to be treated equally the workplace, sce discrimatg agast them is extribly “bee of sex. Some judg, cludg some relatively liberal on, have agreed wh the employers the s that firg someone bee she is transgenr or gay is tegorilly different om firg someone bee she is a woman, and therefore is not vered by Tle VII’s ban on discrimatn “bee of sex.