The Supreme Court led that feral law forbids job discrimatn based on sexual orientatn and transgenr stat, a major victory for advot of gay rights — and a surprise om an creasgly nservative urt.
Contents:
- A BRIEF HISTORY OF GAY RIGHTS AT THE SUPREME COURT
- THE SUPREME COURT RULGS THAT HAVE SHAPED GAY RIGHTS AMERI
- WILL THE SUPREME COURT TARGET NTRACEPTN AND GAY RIGHTS NEXT?
- THE SUPREME COURT’S BLSG OF ANTI-LGBTQ+ DISCRIMATN WILL HNT GAY COUPL
A BRIEF HISTORY OF GAY RIGHTS AT THE SUPREME COURT
On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court livered a monumental victory for gay rights, requirg that all stat license marriag between people of the same sex. Tha… * gay intimacy supreme court *
Supreme Court livered a monumental victory for gay rights, requirg that all stat license marriag between people of the same sex. As recently as 1986, for example, the urt found no nstutnal protectn agast laws banng nsensual homosexual sex.
Here is a brief history of gay-rights cisns at the urt.
THE SUPREME COURT RULGS THAT HAVE SHAPED GAY RIGHTS AMERI
Is firg someone for beg gay or transgenr illegal unr Tle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars employers om discrimatg “bee , lor, relign, sex, or natnal orig”? The Supreme Court will take up that qutn October. At issue is whether lbian, gay, bisexual, and transgenr people have a right to be treated equally the workplace, sce discrimatg agast them is extribly “bee of sex.” The qutn has divid lower urts, often along unpredictable l. * gay intimacy supreme court *
A Los Angel postmaster clared ONE: The Homosexual Magaze to be obscene and refed to liver .
WILL THE SUPREME COURT TARGET NTRACEPTN AND GAY RIGHTS NEXT?
The Court led favor of gay rights as early as 1958. But s cisns haven't always sid wh the LGBT muny. * gay intimacy supreme court *
This was the first Supreme Court se to al wh homosexualy, and also the first victory there for gay rights.
THE SUPREME COURT’S BLSG OF ANTI-LGBTQ+ DISCRIMATN WILL HNT GAY COUPL
* gay intimacy supreme court *
A police officer Geia observed a man havg nsensual homosexual sex his own bedroom, an act which was then illegal there. The man was charged, and his se ma to the Supreme Court, where, a 5-4 loss for gay rights, the urt found no nstutnal protectn for acts of sodomy. After Colorado rints voted for a state nstutnal amendment precludg any laws protectg dividuals based on sexual orientatn, homosexuals and other groups sued.