Same-sex upl say they're happy that Congrs is movg quickly to ensure natnwi regnn of gay marriage. But they're also upset that 's necsary seven years after the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed as a nstutnal right.
Contents:
- SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE RIGHTS BE A STATE OR FERAL LAW?
- STAT ACROSS U.S. STILL CLG TO OUTDATED GAY MARRIAGE BANS
- CALIFORNIA VOTERS WILL BE ASKED TO REAFFIRM GAY MARRIAGE PROTECTNS ON 2024 BALLOT
- GAY MARRIAGE IS LEGAL ALL 50 STAT: SUPREME COURT
- HOW THE SUPREME COURT’S CISN FOR GAY MARRIAGE ULD AFFECT RELIG STUTNS
- THE BT YEAR EVER FOR GAY RIGHTS AMERI
SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE RIGHTS BE A STATE OR FERAL LAW?
* is gay marriage a state or federal issue *
Summary Acrdg to the article mentary on “Gay Coupl, ” supporters of same-sex marriage ntend that the law should uphold the prciple of equal treatment and non-discrimatn by grantg such upl accs to fundamental rights and privileg that are enjoyed by legally married heterosexual upl. Gay Amerins have been llg for the right to create more formalized relatnships sce the 1970s; even so, has been a silent issue. The Hawaii State Supreme Court led that existg laws prohibg same-sex marriage would be unnstutnal unls the state ernment offers a pellg reason not to do so (“Gay Coupl” 2).
This Act neher bans gay marriage self nor do require any state to rtrict them. In the article mentary on “Gay marriag open gate to social stabily”, the thor outl the issue om a social perspective rather than om the popular legal perspective.
He talks about how gay marriage was a salient and illegal topic the past, which most upl end up not enjoyg rights of herance or spoal health verage as heterosexual upl do. In the late 1900s, homosexuals faced nsirable backlash om the muny. The discrimatn is further mirrored durg the AIDS crisis the 1970s which the vis was brand to be a “gay disease” (Freedman 30).
STAT ACROSS U.S. STILL CLG TO OUTDATED GAY MARRIAGE BANS
In June of 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court led all state bans on same-sex marriage unnstutnal, allowg gay and lbian upl to marry natnwi. This timele highlights the chang state polici leadg up to that lg. * is gay marriage a state or federal issue *
However, the issue has evolved to the extent that gay marriage is on the brk of legalizatn the U. The thor remends that the law should support gay marriage rights. Overall, the thor nclus that siar to the eedom of worship and relign, gay marriage rights should be legalized.
Therefore, prohibg homosexual upl om receivg the specific benefs afford to heterosexual upl.
CALIFORNIA VOTERS WILL BE ASKED TO REAFFIRM GAY MARRIAGE PROTECTNS ON 2024 BALLOT
The Hoe of Reprentativ on Tuday passed a bill to dify the right to gay marriage the wake of the Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. Wa * is gay marriage a state or federal issue *
Workg This and Workg Works Ced page Gay marriage rights the U. “Gay Marriage Would Promote Social Stabily.
” Gay Marriage, eded by Kate Burns, Greenhaven P, 2005, pp. “Gay Coupl.
GAY MARRIAGE IS LEGAL ALL 50 STAT: SUPREME COURT
California voters will be asked to affirm gay marriage rights on the 2024 ballot followg Prop. 8 ncerns about the state nstutn. * is gay marriage a state or federal issue *
“The US Supreme Court Will Likely Rule Favor of Gay Marriage. ” Gay Marriage, eded by Debra A. This source provis strong evince on how gay upl were discrimated agast history and the adverse nsequenc of victimizatn.
Samuel Freedman discs his stance on the fluence of gay marriage on social stabily.
The thor supports by outlg the AIDS crisis 1976 that was popular among gays. The relatively high number of gays sufferg om the vis is attributed to the signifint discrimatn that such dividuals faced, leadg to improper behavr (social stabily).
HOW THE SUPREME COURT’S CISN FOR GAY MARRIAGE ULD AFFECT RELIG STUTNS
The ACLU works to ensure that lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr and queer people n live openly whout discrimatn and enjoy equal rights, personal tonomy, and eedom of exprsn and associatn. * is gay marriage a state or federal issue *
Unlike other sourc, Freedman’s article is unique as evaluat gay marriage rights heavily om a social perspective rather than legal. It provis strong evince of the sufferg and discrimatn of homosexual upl over time, cludg the laws, such as DOMA, that were directed agast them.
In the 1970s, although gay marriag were takg place, they were kept as a silent issue.
It igned a natnwi bate that led to the creatn and implementatn of the Defense of Marriage Acts (DOMA) that neher banned gay marriage self nor required any state to rtrict them. Over time, the gay marriage stutn gaed nsirable support throughout the U.
THE BT YEAR EVER FOR GAY RIGHTS AMERI
This source is paratively distct to the thors as giv a tailed scriptn of the path to the legalizatn of gay marriage rights om the 1970s. This article provis strong evince of how the DOMA and specifilly the Oh DOMA ged on gay upl’ rights. As a rult, strongly supports my argument by highlightg the dangers of givg stat the power to mandate the legal stat of gay marriag.
Therefore, om the thors’ standpot, n be nclud that creatg laws prohibg gay marriage rights eventually has a trimental effect on their rights as cizens. The source supports my argument that the prohibn of gay marriage rights some stat is a vlatn of the Fourteenth Amendment clse.