Web signer opposed to gay marriage at center of U.S. Supreme Court clash | Rters

Contents:

• WEB SIGNER OPPOSED TO GAY MARRIAGE AT CENTER OF U.S. SUPREME COURT CLASH
• JUDGE US SUPREME COURT’S GAY WEDDG WEBSE RULG FOR HER OWN ANTI-LGBTQ LAWSU
• TEXAS JUDGE FIGHTS TO NY WEDDG CEREMONI TO GAY UPL
• THE MYSTER CASE OF THE FAKE GAY MARRIAGE WEBSE, THE REAL STRAIGHT MAN, AND THE SUPREME COURT

WEB SIGNER OPPOSED TO GAY MARRIAGE AT CENTER OF U.S. SUPREME COURT CLASH

" "My predictn is that we will not see a lot of the s" says Yale law profsor William Eskridge, who has wrten extensively about gay rights. "The jtic led 6-3 along iologil l favor of Denver-area web signer Lorie Smh, who ced her Christian beliefs agast gay marriage challengg a Colorado anti-discrimatn law.

"Sotomayor add, "By issug this new license to discrimate a se brought by a pany that seeks to ny same-sex upl the full and equal enjoyment of s servic, the immediate, symbolic effect of the cisn is to mark gays and lbians for send-class stat. A 2015 cisn legalized gay marriage natnwi.

A 2020 lg found that a feral law barrg workplace discrimatn protects gay and transgenr ACCOMMODATIONS LAWSmh, who liv the Denver suburb of Ltleton, is an evangelil Christian who has said she believ marriage is only between a man and a woman.

JUDGE US SUPREME COURT’S GAY WEDDG WEBSE RULG FOR HER OWN ANTI-LGBTQ LAWSU

She preemptively sued Colorado's civil rights missn and other state officials 2016 bee she said she feared beg punished for refg to serve gay weddgs unr Colorado's public acmodatns lled Friday's lg a victory for all Amerins, addg, "Colorado n't force me or anyone to say somethg we don't believe. And so on, " Sotomayor 's cisn followed one 2018 which the jtic led favor of a Denver-area baker who refed based on his Christian views to make a weddg ke for a gay acmodatns laws exist many stat, banng discrimatn areas such as hog, hotels, retail bs, rtrants and tnal stutns.

AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTThe se may settle a qutn left open 2018: how to rencile claims of relig liberty wh laws barrg discrimatn based on sexual Kirkpatrick for The New York TimWASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed on Tuday to hear an appeal om a Colorado web signer who objects to providg servic for same-sex marriag, returng the jtic to a battleground the culture wars ptg claims of relig eedom agast laws prohibg discrimatn on the basis of sexual urt last nsired the clash 2018, when a siar dispute between a Colorado baker and a gay uple failed to yield a five precise qutn the jtic agreed to ci the new se is “whether applyg a public-acmodatn law to pel an artist to speak or stay silent vlat the ee speech clse of the First Amendment. It ncerns Lorie Smh, who owns a webse sign pany that says serv gay ctomers but tends to lim s weddg-related servic to celebratns of heterosexual unns. ”A Colorado law forbids discrimatn agast gay people by bs open to the public as well as statements announcg such discrimatn.

”Lower urts have generally sid wh gay and lbian upl who were refed service, lg that they are entled to equal treatment, at least parts of the untry wh laws forbiddg discrimatn based on sexual owners of bs challengg those laws have argued that the ernment should not force them to choose between the requirements of their fahs and their livelihoods, cg nstutnal protectns for ee speech and relig Smh’s lawyers had also asked the Supreme Court to ci whether the Colorado law vlated her right to the ee exercise of relign and to nsir whether to overle an important precent om 1990, Employment Divisn v. More about Adam LiptakA versn of this article appears prt on, Sectn A, Page 16 of the New York edn wh the headle: Jtic Will Revis Free Speech Qutns In Gay Marriage Case.

TEXAS JUDGE FIGHTS TO NY WEDDG CEREMONI TO GAY UPL

The urt legalized gay marriage natnwi a landmark 2015 cisn. That cisn termed that Colorado officials vlated his relig rights but stoppg short of rvg out a ee speech exemptn to anti-discrimatn preemptively sued Colorado's civil rights missn and other state officials 2016 bee she feared she would be punished for refg to serve gay weddgs.

Unsurprisgly, Mchell oppos gay rights and said a Supreme Court brief that Obergefell v.

THE MYSTER CASE OF THE FAKE GAY MARRIAGE WEBSE, THE REAL STRAIGHT MAN, AND THE SUPREME COURT

Acrdg to the Texas judicial missn’s 2019 warng, Hensley referred gay upl who wanted her to pri over their marriage ceremony to other people who would officiate. ”Here is what we know—though, to be ank, I do not know what we have learned om this yearslong mystery, other than looks like Smh and her attorneys have, perhaps unwtgly, vented a gay uple need of a weddg webse a se which they argue that same-sex marriag are “false. Dpe the district urt raisg doubts about reprentg a genue quiry om two men gettg married—and the urt didn’t even raise the real doubt that the uple do not exist— is now part of the se history, a b of fan fictn jog the other phantom gays the se vok.

ADF ma no mentn of Stewart and Mike specifilly their arguments before the Supreme Court this ssn, but they don’t need to: Their entire se, after all, is built around the ia of gay people dog somethg that they have not yet done, nor ever will do. She sought the urt’s judgment even though she had not been approached to sign a webse for a gay uple.

Xavier Becerra sce payg for preventn servic like PrEP enurag homosexual behavr, which his clients reject as addn to queer patients, straight people e PrEP dgs as well.