Jordan Peterson homosexualy aris gay issu. Gay parentg n be problem. Self ntrol sexual act is sential. Impulse aris dangers.
Contents:
- JORDAN PETERSON'S VIEWS ON GAY MARRIAGE AND CHILD-REARG ARE DUMB
- ‘HOW ULD HE?’: FORMER JORDAN PETERSON ADMIRER REACTS TO HIS BETRAYAL ON ‘GAY PARENTG’
JORDAN PETERSON'S VIEWS ON GAY MARRIAGE AND CHILD-REARG ARE DUMB
* jordan peterson gay marriage *
Peterson discs “Gay Parentg: Promise and Pfalls” an terview wh Dave Rub, a “married” homosexual. Rub talks about formg a homosexual “fay” and even “havg” children (via surrogat). We’re tryg to sketch out a pathway, ” he says and later nclus the culture appears to have cid that “gay” marriage has bee “part of the stcture of marriage self.
He do this by suggtg that the highly sexualized homosexual liftyle n be domtited by this “marriage” and that this new creatn n be a nservative force fense of the fay.
‘HOW ULD HE?’: FORMER JORDAN PETERSON ADMIRER REACTS TO HIS BETRAYAL ON ‘GAY PARENTG’
Tonight profsor Jordan Peterson—daddy of all lobsters, Kerm of all ogs, palt of the spirs crawlg around on the Intellectual Dark Web—will stop by Portland's Keller Audorium. I won't attend the lecture bee I wasn't ved, but I do want to celebrate his parture. I'll briefly review Mr. Peterson's ias about gay marriage and gay child-rearg. He's a clil psychologist, after all, so maybe he has some tertg thgs to say about those subjects. Surprise!... * jordan peterson gay marriage *
The myth of homosexual domtitn through marriage has long been ed as a means to ga acceptance for same-sex “marriage. Peterson adms that by openg the doors of “marriage” to homosexuals, the more optimistic nservativ had hoped might give rise to some kd of normalcy. Peterson tak this domtitn myth one step further by suatg that society might be to blame for the excsive and flamboyant homosexual promiscuy, given the lack of stctur like “marriage” that past that uld channel the energi to more nstctive purpos.
It nsists of the belief that homosexual marriage n reprent a force the fight agast the “woke” tablishment and the “transsexual” revolutn that is now the cuttg edge of the sexual revolutn. Concsns ma to homosexuals yterday led to today’s “transsexual” mands.
The msage is the homosexual revolutn is yterday’s revolutn; the foc mt be upon today’s “transsexual” Jabs. I rearch Jordan Peterson on homosexualy.