Contents:
- REVISNIST GAY THEOLOGY: DID GOD REALLY SAY…?
- A REFORMATN THE CHURCH DON’T NEED: ANSWERG REVISNIST PRO-GAY THEOLOGY—PART I
- A REFORMATN THE CHURCH DON’T NEED: ANSWERG REVISNIST PRO-GAY THEOLOGY—PART II
- EARS TO HEAR, BORN AGA AND GAY THEOLOGY
- PRO-GAY THEOLOGY OVERVIEW
- GAY REVISNIST THEOLOGY: DID GOD REALLY SAY…?
REVISNIST GAY THEOLOGY: DID GOD REALLY SAY…?
Specifilly, homosexual activists and their alli know that the Juo-Christian sexual ethic found the Bible is the last bastn of fense holdg back the wispread embrace of homosexualy throughout the culture. For example, gay strategists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, their landmark homosexual public relatns manual published 1989, boldly enuraged gays “to muddy the moral waters, that is, to unrcut the ratnalizatns that ‘jtify’ relig bigotry and to jam some of s psychic rewards. While Pl was referrg to certa false doctr that Timothy would undoubtedly face his mistry, this warng siarly appli to the Body of Christ today as we face a revisnist theology that – this se – qutns God’s clear mand to not engage homosexual behavr.
A REFORMATN THE CHURCH DON’T NEED: ANSWERG REVISNIST PRO-GAY THEOLOGY—PART I
Christians’ prejudice agast homosexuals leads them to misread biblil texts about homosexualy;Scriptur that supposedly nmn homosexual behavr have actually been mistranslated;Scriptur that supposedly nmn homosexual behavr have been taken out of ntext and do not apply to our prent society. Gay revisnists ually do not even attempt to addrs God’s created tent for human sexualy, but stead twist Scripture and argue agast those texts which nmn same-sex remas highly unlikely that Bible translators mistranslated five referenc to sexual ethics two different ttaments of Scripture. Homosexualy Levic, Romans, 1 Corthians, and 1 Timothy is mentned the wir ntext of sexual, immoral, and prohibed behavrs, all of which elaborate on the mandment, “You shall not m adultery, ” prohibg sex outsi of a male-female marriage.
A REFORMATN THE CHURCH DON’T NEED: ANSWERG REVISNIST PRO-GAY THEOLOGY—PART II
Referenc nmng homosexual behavr were addrsed to highly different Ancient Near East cultur (om Hebrew to Gre-Roman) – nullifyg the argument that scriptural passag agast homosexualy are culturally bound and applible to today’s argument that J said nothg about homosexualy the gospels is misleadg and illogil for at least five reasons:.
EARS TO HEAR, BORN AGA AND GAY THEOLOGY
To make his view most appealg, then, V wants to make sure every non-gay-affirmg Christian has a pleasant enunter wh a gay person, pecially a “gay Christian”5—to overe what might be lled the “ick” factor—the disfort many feel about homosexualy chiefly bee they have no gay fay or iends.
PRO-GAY THEOLOGY OVERVIEW
We n safely set asi the scriptural prohibns agast homosexual behavr bee we are parg appl and orang: we are talkg our day about mted, nsensual, lifelong partnerships, somethg the biblil thors their day knew nothg about. He offers the grace to accept their te inty – not as gay, lbian or bi-sexual – but as His sons and dghters, embracg their blogil realy as male or are also ncerned about homosexualy’s impact on fai, the church and our culture. Society and fai always do bt when dividuals follow God’s created tent for rourc this sectn will help you unrstand and articulate God’s sign for human sexualy and rpond to revisnist theologil arguments that have been created to jtify homosexual behavr.
GAY REVISNIST THEOLOGY: DID GOD REALLY SAY…?
A Change of Affectn: A Gay Man’s Incredible Story of Remptn by Beckett CookThe powerful, dramatic story of how a succsful Hollywood set signer whose inty was eply rooted his homosexualy me to be sudnly and utterly transformed by the power of the Bible and Homosexual Practice: Text and Hermentics by Robert A.