<p><strong>Pl Otreicher:</strong> I preached on Good Friday that J's timacy wh John suggted he was gay as I felt eply had to be addrsed</p>
Contents:
- NO, OF COURSE THAT UFC GUY DIDN'T YELL ABOUT "NOT FOR GAY J" ON TV
- WAS J GAY? PROBABLY
- BRAZIL: NETFLIX 'GAY J' PARODY FILM BAN OVERTURNED
- WAS J GAY?
- GAY J – WHO WAS THE BELOVED DISCIPLE?
- 'WAS J GAY?’: THE CLASS UNVERG HIDN QUEER HISTORI
- TIM MACKIE OF THE BIBLE PROJECT PROMOT ABERRANT TEACHG ON HOMOSEXUALY: ‘IN J, THERE’S NO GAY OR STRAIGHT’
- IS J GAY: DIVG INTO THE CONTROVERSIAL SPECULATN OF J’ SEXUAL INTY
- DO GAY PEOPLE GO TO HEAVEN?
NO, OF COURSE THAT UFC GUY DIDN'T YELL ABOUT "NOT FOR GAY J" ON TV
The Bible vers aren't about nmng homosexuals, gays, lbians, or transgenr people. Rather, read God's lovg warng and grace for those who have strayed om His will for sex * no for gay jesus *
Pope Francis was recently asked about his views on homosexualy. Persons wh homosexual tennci are children of God. Crimalisg people wh homosexual tennci is an jtice.
This isn’t the first time Pope Francis has shown himself to be a progrsive lear when to, among other thgs, gay Catholics. As a biblil scholar, I would suggt that church lears who e their cultur and theology to exclu homosexuals don’t read Scripture refully. Those who would exclu homosexuals om God’s kgdom choose to ignore J, turng stead to the Old Ttament – most particularly to Genis 19, the stctn of the ci of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Their terpretatn of the story is that is about homosexualy. Levic 18:22 and 20:13, for example, are not about “homosexualy” as we now unrstand – as the rg, lovg and sexual relatnship between people of the same sex. Christians – no matter which church they belong to – should follow Pl and extend to the heterosexual-homosexual distctn.
WAS J GAY? PROBABLY
Do “Go for J, not for gay J, people!” sound like a plsible, idmatic form of relig trollg to you, or do maybe seem like the sort of fantilized stcture that’s easy to map onto a non-native speaker’s syntax and pronunciatn? * no for gay jesus *
” Some people heard, “Not for gay J, ” which is kd of a stupid thg to hear bee would also be a stupid thg to say. So when a Cuban is misheard to say “not for gay J, ” the first reactn, for some, isn’t to square that agast mon sense.
BRAZIL: NETFLIX 'GAY J' PARODY FILM BAN OVERTURNED
UFC fighter Yoel Romero might have jt spoke out very heavily agast gay marriage. * no for gay jesus *
Takg a left turn toward gay J at the end of a basele relig pamphlet pch do not make sense as a tra of thought or argument. “Don’t go back to relign for gay J” do not make sense translatn or otherwise.
”I haven’t done much diggg on Romero’s polics, beyond several old articl notg his Bible-humpg, and, sure, ’s possible the hardre relig si of him shas his views about gay marriage. Many who support same-sex marriage and gay rights argue that, sce J never mentned homosexualy, He did not nsir to be sful.
WAS J GAY?
* no for gay jesus *
After all, the argument go, if homosexualy is bad, why did J treat as a non-issue? It is technilly te that J did not specifilly addrs homosexualy the Gospel acunts; however, He did speak clearly about sexualy general. The pot is that J did not need to emize s, pecially when the further revelatn ntaed the Epistl remov all doubt as to homosexualy’s sfulns.
In addn, unbelievers who practice homosexualy stand need of salvatn jt like any other unbeliever. Christians are lled to pray for those who do not know Christ, to serve others love, and to share the msage of J wh all people, cludg those volved homosexualy.
GAY J – WHO WAS THE BELOVED DISCIPLE?
If the J of History was gay, he mt have had someone to be gay wh. Who is the strongt ndidate for the role of J’ GBF. * no for gay jesus *
If homosexualy is a s, why didn’t J ever mentn ? In a 2012 article for Slate onle, Will Orem asked a provotive qutn: Was J a homophobe? The article was ocsned by a story about a gay teenager Oh who was sug his high school after school officials prohibed him om wearg a T-shirt that said, “J Is Not a Homophobe.
'WAS J GAY?’: THE CLASS UNVERG HIDN QUEER HISTORI
Is J gay, queer, or bisexual? It is important to exame His nature as a man and as God to dispel speculatns about whether or not He is gay or queer. * no for gay jesus *
Orem suggts that J’s views on homosexualy were more clive than Pl’s.
TIM MACKIE OF THE BIBLE PROJECT PROMOT ABERRANT TEACHG ON HOMOSEXUALY: ‘IN J, THERE’S NO GAY OR STRAIGHT’
While ’s reasonable to assume that J and his fellow Jews first-century Palte would have disapproved of gay sex, there is no rerd of his ever havg mentned homosexualy, let alone exprsed particular revulsn about ....
Never the Bible do J himself offer an explic prohibn of homosexualy. Orem seems to suggt that sce J never explicly mentned homosexualy, he mt not have been very ncerned about .
Get a ee py of the ebook ‘What Do the Bible Really Teach about Homosexualy? It is credible to suggt that the words om J have no bearg on the qutn of homosexualy. So Orem has misnsted the relevance of J’s teachg to the homosexual qutn.
IS J GAY: DIVG INTO THE CONTROVERSIAL SPECULATN OF J’ SEXUAL INTY
Even if J viewed homosexualy as a s, he had a penchant for reachg out to sners rather than shunng them.... In Romans 1, Pl nounced gay sex as unnatural—an egreg example of pagan nce—and said would brg the wrath of God. On the one si is J: peace-lovg, enemy-fivg, egalarian, and clive wh regard to homosexuals.
DO GAY PEOPLE GO TO HEAVEN?
On the other si is Pl: war-lovg, ath penalty–supportg, patriarchal, and exclnary wh regard to homosexuals. Dpe the hang-ups of people like Pl, J was not a homophobe. Wh clary and passn, this book sets forth the Bible’s teachg on sexualy om a plementarian perspective, alg wh ntroversial issu such as homosexualy and polygamy.
On the other hand, a few people thk he said “no fet J”, which isn’t a direct attack agast the natnal legalizatn of gay marriage that jt happened the US. Romero said he wasn’t talkg about gay marriage.
Do not be ceived; neher fornitors, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effemate, nor homosexuals, nor thiev, nor the veto, nor dnkards, nor revilers, nor swdlers, will her the kgdom of God. realizg the fact that law is not ma for a righteo person, but for those who are lawls and rebell, for the ungodly and sners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murrers and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is ntrary to sound teachg, acrdg to the glor gospel of the blsed God, wh which I have been entsted. Do not be ceived; neher fornitors, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effemate, nor homosexuals,.