Opposn to gay unns has been swept away. Will relig rights go next?
Contents:
MY ANSWERS TO QUTNS ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE
gay “marriage”, here is a list of the qutns I e across most often, wh my brief answers:-1-"Why are you agast gay marriage?"I * gay marriage interview questions *
Don’t all opposn to same-sex marriage boil down to homophobia and opposn to gay sex? The arguments that I have raised agast same-sex marriage here and elsewhere do not pruppose opposn of homosexual relatns, nor even to their regnn by society.
The qutn that we are addrsg here is not about the moraly of homosexual practice (a qutn that mt be addrsed s own place), but about the meang of marriage.
The effect of same-sex marriage is not really about the cumulative effect of particular gay upl gettg married.
Q&A: COMMONLY ASKED QUTNS ABOUT THE ‘GAY MARRIAGE’ ISSUE
* gay marriage interview questions *
Even those of who have ethil objectns to homosexual practice should be able to regnize the posive dimensns of a mment between two persons for mutual support, provisn, and pannship. Rather, is about the sistence that homosexual relatns are no ls valuable to society than heterosexual on. What is beg sought civil partnerships, and even more sistently same-sex marriage, is the public affirmatn and celebratn of homosexual sex, as terchangeable wh maral sex between a man and woman.
To make civil partnerships ntgent upon homosexual sex or to offer same-sex marriag would be unjtly discrimatory agast those who serve the same social goods apart om sexual relatns.
It would treat homosexual sex as if entled people to special treatment, apart om a monstratn of s objective value relative to wir social goods and ends. The ncern unrlyg this qutn is that we don’t, through a nstant bracketg of the qutn of the moraly of homosexual practice, end up abandong the historic Christian nvictn that homosexual practice is ntrary to dive will and human nature. This mak difficult for them to tablish mon ground wh those who do not share their moral objectns to homosexual practice.