"Beg gay is not a s" is the mantra that one young Harvard stunt is tryg to promulgate. But while Matthew V has attracted a growg followg wh his accsible, scholarly arguments, evangelil scholars don't believe he'll make much headway the Christian muny.
Contents:
- RECENT POSTSCANADA, FRANCE AND JAPAN ARE PLANNG TO CREASE THEIR NUCLEAR POWER PRODUCTNDEMOCRAT MAYOR PLEADS GUILTY TO 140 CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CHARGGAY MARRIAGE BATE: MICHAEL BROWN BAT ERIC SMAW ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGESTT KLENDORF FENDS THE PRO-LIFE VIEW ON THE UNBELIEVABLE RAD SHOWDID DEI TRAER KIKE OJO-THOMPSON HARASS AND BULLY RICHARD BILKSZTO TO END HIMSELF?FACEBOOK CENSORED POSTS AT THE REQUT OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY / BIN ADMISTRATNIS THE BIBLE’S FN OF FAH OPPOSED TO LOGIC AND EVINCE?NEW SURVEY: HIGH SCHOOL BOYS TWICE AS LIKELY TO BE NSERVATIVE THAN HIGH SCHOOL GIRLSNEW STUDY: 81% ENDURE PA THE FIVE YEARS AFTER SEX-CHANGE SURGERIWILLIAM LANE CRAIG LECTUR ON THE HISTORIL J AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSY RECENT MENTS
- WHY ‘GOD AND THE GAY CHRISTIAN’ IS WRONG ABOUT THE BIBLE AND SAME-SEX RELATNSHIPS
- MY RPONSE TO MATTHEW V´GAY THEOLOGY
RECENT POSTSCANADA, FRANCE AND JAPAN ARE PLANNG TO CREASE THEIR NUCLEAR POWER PRODUCTNDEMOCRAT MAYOR PLEADS GUILTY TO 140 CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CHARGGAY MARRIAGE BATE: MICHAEL BROWN BAT ERIC SMAW ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGESTT KLENDORF FENDS THE PRO-LIFE VIEW ON THE UNBELIEVABLE RAD SHOWDID DEI TRAER KIKE OJO-THOMPSON HARASS AND BULLY RICHARD BILKSZTO TO END HIMSELF?FACEBOOK CENSORED POSTS AT THE REQUT OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY / BIN ADMISTRATNIS THE BIBLE’S FN OF FAH OPPOSED TO LOGIC AND EVINCE?NEW SURVEY: HIGH SCHOOL BOYS TWICE AS LIKELY TO BE NSERVATIVE THAN HIGH SCHOOL GIRLSNEW STUDY: 81% ENDURE PA THE FIVE YEARS AFTER SEX-CHANGE SURGERIWILLIAM LANE CRAIG LECTUR ON THE HISTORIL J AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSY RECENT MENTS
Details: Can you be gay and Christian? Matthew V says you n and he’s created a viral vio and bt-sellg book fendg his view. This Saturday on Up for Debate, V jos host Julie Roys to bate thor and leadg evangelil apologist, Dr. Michael Brown. Is gay monogamy an optn for Christians? Is unlovg to… * vines gay *
MB: Matthew thks that God himself did not unrstand the ncept of sexual orientatn and advertently hurt gays bee of his lack of knowledge.
This is important bee the statistics show that gay relatnships (pendg on whether is female-female or male-male) are prone to stabily and/or fily.
WHY ‘GOD AND THE GAY CHRISTIAN’ IS WRONG ABOUT THE BIBLE AND SAME-SEX RELATNSHIPS
Matthew V is a 22-year-old gay Christian who believ beg gay is not a s. He me to that ncln after two years of studyg Scripture and the works of dozens of biblil scholars. The Harvard Universy stunt, currently on leave of absence, is now tryg to w over fellow believers not jt wh an emotnal ttimony but wh what he is prentg as biblilly solid arguments. * vines gay *
Gay relatnships do not normally value permanence and exclivy the way that oppose-sex marriage relatnships do, pecially where the uple regularly attends church. We have published studi like this one showg that there are negative impacts to children who are raised by gay upl, which dovetails wh studi showg that children need a mother and that children need a father. I wrote prevly about the argument that gay activists e where they say “if you don’t agree wh me and celebrate me and affirm me, then I’ll m suici”.
I don’t fd the threats to self-stctn to be a nvcg argument for the tth of the view that gay marriage beg the same as heterosexual marriage. In fact, this is nfirmed by a recent study which showed that featur of gay relatnships themselv, and not social disapproval, is to blame for high rat of suici the gay muny. V seems to want to argue that the ntext which the Bible thors were wrg did not allow them to addrs the problem of gays “long-term”, “fahful” relatnships.
In addn, V is tryg to argue that 1) the Bible thors were not aware of “long-term”, “fahful” gay relatnships and 2) their failure to explicly disqualify the “long-term”, “stable” gay sexual relatnships means that the Bible actually ndon them. Every sgle Christian before V, who were closer to J’ teachgs than V, unrstood the vers that Brown ced to be providg a blanket prohibn on homosexual sex acts.
MY RPONSE TO MATTHEW V´GAY THEOLOGY
* vines gay *
Followg Matthew V' terview will be rpons om evangelil theologians, and fally, gut ntributns om Christians who have chosen not to engage homosexualy and those who don't believe a gay liftyle nflicts wh the Bible. "There is no ntradictn between beg Christian and beg gay, " he told arguments – maly agast six Bible passag that are monly ed by Christians to nmn homosexualy – are gag populary as evinced by his YouTube views.