Four Supreme Court jtic did not vote to legalize gay marriage the Uned Stat, cg a range of opns, cludg Jtice Anton Slia blastg the urt's official cisn as "pretent as s ntent is egotistic."
Contents:
- WHY FOUR JTIC WERE AGAST THE SUPREME COURT'S HUGE GAY-MARRIAGE DECISN
- JTIC KENNEDY AND SLIA AND THEIR DIVI ON GAY RIGHTS
- ANTON SLIA ROUTELY LED AGAST GAY RIGHTS. THOSE OPNS EXPLA HIS PHILOSOPHY.
- READ SLIA GAY MARRIAGE DISSENT: SUPREME COURT JTICE SLAMS 'CONSTUTNAL REVISN'
- CALIFORNIA VOTERS WILL BE ASKED TO REAFFIRM GAY MARRIAGE PROTECTNS ON 2024 BALLOT
- JTICE SLIA'S GAY MARRIAGE ADVICE: 'ASK THE NEART HIPPIE'
- GAY STUNT ASKS JTICE SLIA TO FEND HIS 'BTIALY' MENTS
- 4 SUPREME COURT JTIC VOTED AGAST GAY MARRIAGE: READ THEIR OPNS
- HOW ANTON SLIA HELPED OPEN THE DOOR TO GAY MARRIAGE NATNWI
- HOW THE SUPREME COURT’S NSERVATIV EXPLAED THEIR VOT AGAST GAY MARRIAGE
WHY FOUR JTIC WERE AGAST THE SUPREME COURT'S HUGE GAY-MARRIAGE DECISN
Supreme Court Jtice Anton Slia torched the majory opn regnizg gay marriage natnwi lorful language. * did scalia vote for gay marriage *
” Fally, Slia warned that the lg to extend marriage rights to gay upl across the untry would rob the urt of s power: “Hubris is sometim fed as o’erweeng pri; and pri, we know, goeth before a fall.
In lg favor of gay marriage, he said, "Five lawyers have closed the bate and enacted their own visn of marriage as a matter of nstutnal law. "(RELATED: What 2016 Candidat Are Sayg About the Gay Marriage Rulg)Roberts's other dispute is that many of the arguments ma support of gay marriage uld also be ed to support plural marriage. "If not havg the opportuny to marry 'serv to disrpect and subordate' gay and lbian upl, why wouldn't the same 'imposn of this disabily, '...
"(RELATED: Watch The Two GOP Printial Candidat After the Supreme Court's Gay Marriage Decisn)Slia wrote that if he ever were to jo an opn that began wh that sentence he "would hi my head a bag, " sayg such language was more like the "mystil aphorisms of the fortune okie" than, say, legendary Chief Jtice John Marshall.
JTIC KENNEDY AND SLIA AND THEIR DIVI ON GAY RIGHTS
How Slia's opns on gay rights expla the late Supreme Court jtice. * did scalia vote for gay marriage *
"Jtice Samuel AloIn his dissent, Alo argued that gay marriage is not protected the Constutn unr the Due Procs Clse bee "liberty" only appli to those prcipl that are rooted U.
His argument is that the ncept of gay marriage is new and therefore not clud. The Jtic the majory claim the thory to nfer nstutnal protectn upon that right simply bee they believe that is fundamental, " Alo also reaffirmed his posn that there is no way to nfirm what the oute of gay marriage may be on the stutn of tradnal marriage, and therefore the Court is and should not be a posn to take on the "For lennia, marriage was extribly lked to the one thg that only an oppose-sex uple n do: procreate. Their basic argument is that Stat formalize and promote marriage, unlike other fulfillg human relatnships, orr to enurage potentially procreative nduct to take place wh a lastg un that has long been thought to provi the bt atmosphere for raisg that the majory has led favor of gay marriage, Alo offered a stark warng about future nflict between relig liberty and progrsive ias.
Rellg the harsh treatment of gays and lbians the past, some may thk that turnabout is fair play. Related: Anton Slia: The Supreme Court Jtice's Life PicturFunny or not, here are some of Slia's most ntroversial opns and most outrageo quot:On Gay Rights:From the pot that the Supreme Court first led favor of gay rights 1996, when the majory led that stat uld ban discrimatory acts agast gay people, Slia's opn on the subject had some crgg.
ANTON SLIA ROUTELY LED AGAST GAY RIGHTS. THOSE OPNS EXPLA HIS PHILOSOPHY.
California voters will be asked to affirm gay marriage rights on the 2024 ballot followg Prop. 8 ncerns about the state nstutn. * did scalia vote for gay marriage *
But I had thought that one uld nsir certa nduct reprehensible — murr, for example, or polygamy, or celty to animals — and uld exhib even 'anim' toward such nduct, " Slia wrote his speakg at Prceton 2012, Slia was asked by a stunt why he would pare laws banng homosexualy wh laws agast murr. "If we nnot have moral feelgs agast homosexualy, n we have agast murr? ""I'm surprised you aren't persuad, " Slia told the stunt, who intifi as 2012, Slia said homosexualy should be illegal bee had been a crime for so long.
"Homosexual sodomy? For 200 years, was crimal every state, " he June, nearly two s after Slia wrote his first dissent on gay rights, the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage famolysuggted his dissent to "ask the neart hippie, " while argug that "Freedom of Intimacy is abridged rather than expand by marriage.
How people outsi the urt reacted to the gay marriage lgGay rights supporters celebrate after the U. Wh the lg, gay marriage will bee legal all 50 stat. REUTERS/Jim Bourg (Jim Bourg/Rters)The Supreme Court’s lg Friday that same-sex upl uld get married no matter where they live was the culmatn of two remarkable wav that have spread across the untry recent years: The swell of urts strikg down state bans on same-sex marriage and the surge public support for such, even as public opn has shifted and urts have acted, the high urt’s 5 to 4 lg was a historic and narrow victory for gay rights.
READ SLIA GAY MARRIAGE DISSENT: SUPREME COURT JTICE SLAMS 'CONSTUTNAL REVISN'
The nservative's latt turn of phrase his gay-marriage dissent ma a splash on social media. * did scalia vote for gay marriage *
”The Supreme Court's gay marriage cisn explaed 60 sends. Constutn provis same-sex upl the right to marry, handg a historic triumph to the Amerin gay rights movement.
Kennedy and Anton Slia were born the same year, chosen by the same print, live on the same Northern Virgia street and, servg together on the Supreme Court longer than any other current pair of jtic, have many tim voted the same nservative one issue — how the Constutn protects gay cizens — divis and f the two like no other. This week's historic hearg on same-sex marriage is both the logil extensn and ultimate showdown a s-long argument that so far Kennedy has always of Kennedy's bold and lyril lgs on behalf of gays — "tim n bld to certa tths and later generatns n see that laws once thought necsary and proper fact serve only to opprs, " he wrote Lawrence v. Kennedy has wrten all of the Supreme Court's most important cisns on gay rights: protectg the civil rights of homosexuals Romer v.
Evans (1996), abolishg anti-gay sodomy laws Lawrence. Wdsor two years ago that the feral ernment mt regnize same-sex was a steppgstone to the Supreme Court’s nsiratn on Tuday of whether the Constutn forbids stat om prohibg gay upl to the pattern ntu and the urt renrs a landmark lg favorg gay marriage, will likely once aga be Kennedy whose words memorialize that cisn and Slia who will articulate the is not a nflict everyone would have predicted for two of Ronald Reagan’s choic for the urt. Here's what you need to know about the se that uld make gay marriage legal across the natn.
CALIFORNIA VOTERS WILL BE ASKED TO REAFFIRM GAY MARRIAGE PROTECTNS ON 2024 BALLOT
(Vio: Julie Percha/The Washgton Post)"Their different approach to gay rights reflects their more fundamental disagreement about how to thk about the liberti protected by the Constutn, " said Pl M. "Michael Dorf, a profsor at Cornell Law School and a former Kennedy clerk, said his former boss’s cisns on gay rights were not nstcted to lead ultimately to a cisn on same-sex marriage.
”Although he never led for gay rights as a lower urt judge, Kennedy exprsed ncern about the policy even as he upheld the ary's right to dismiss gay servicemen. “He me about as close as you n as a lower urt judge to sayg was wrongly cid, ” Colucci on the urt, Kennedy was able to say jt the first gay rights se, Romer, Kennedy wrote for the majory strikg down a Colorado nstutnal amendment. After some ci the state began passg laws protectg gays om discrimatn hog, employment and other areas, voters through a referendum approved the amendment precludg such ernment protectns.
JTICE SLIA'S GAY MARRIAGE ADVICE: 'ASK THE NEART HIPPIE'
Colorado’s amendment, Kennedy wrote, “classifi homosexuals not to further a proper legislative end but to make them unequal to everyone else. "This urt has no bs imposg upon all Amerins the rolutn favored by the ele class om which the members of this stutn are selected, pronouncg that 'animosy' toward homosexualy is evil, " Slia wrote Romer. " Private, homosexual nduct between nsentg adults, he wrote, "volv liberty of the person both s spatial and more transcennt dimensns.
"O’Connor wrote a ncurrg opn to say the lg did not touch on the matter of whether gays would be able to 's rponse: "Do not believe . "Slia wrote that homosexuals should be ee to promote their e through mocratic means, but “many Amerins do not want persons who openly engage homosexual nduct as partners their bs, as sutmasters for their children, as teachers their children’s schools, or as boarrs their home.
GAY STUNT ASKS JTICE SLIA TO FEND HIS 'BTIALY' MENTS
’ ”Two years ago, Wdsor, Kennedy wrote that the feral ernment's refal to offer the same ernment benefs available to heterosexual upl to legally married gay upl tells "all the world that their otherwise valid marriag are unworthy" and "huiat" their, Slia blasted the cisn, sayg the majory was merely beg y sayg the cisn did not addrs whether stat are required to give licens for same-sex marriage. Perhaps no cha of s monstrated this better than Slia's very nsistent opposn to gay rights.
4 SUPREME COURT JTIC VOTED AGAST GAY MARRIAGE: READ THEIR OPNS
In his view, wasn't so much that he was opposed to gay rights — although he was — but that such rights simply weren't protected by a very origalist terpretatn of the Constutn and s amendments. Slia's opposn to gay rights showed his brand of nservatism. Slia was a nsistent opponent of nstutnal claims ma on behalf of gay rights.
HOW ANTON SLIA HELPED OPEN THE DOOR TO GAY MARRIAGE NATNWI
At the heart of Slia's opposn to gay rights was his view that the US Constutn simply did not protect the rights of gay people. So the three major s that me to the urt sce 2003, Slia oped agast gay rights sometim btal dissents. His lleagu, of urse, argued that the 14th Amendment protected gay people — by forbiddg any level of ernment om passg discrimatory laws that nied people their fundamental rights.
HOW THE SUPREME COURT’S NSERVATIV EXPLAED THEIR VOT AGAST GAY MARRIAGE
Slia rejected the view, claimg the Constutn, the 14th Amendment, and their amers ma no mentn of gay rights and therefore did not tend to protect gay people. Texas 2003, where the Court led that stat' anti-sodomy laws — which effectively banned gay sex — were unnstutnal, Slia warned his dissent that the logic ed to strike down the lg uld upend stat' laws agast same-sex marriage:. The Supreme Court reasoned that all the anti-gay laws were unnstutnal for largely the same reason: They discrimated agast a group of people by whholdg fundamental rights and vlated the 14th Amendment.
Slia's stance on gay rights monstrated his origalist view: He believed the Constutn uldn't protect gay rights, bee no one uld envisn, for example, same-sex marriage as an issue back when the Constutn and s amendments were wrten.