A Catholic prit Glasgow has been removed as a universy chapla after hostg a rosary of reparatn for the cy’s gay pri para.
Contents:
- PRO-LGBT PRIT PROMOT ‘RABOW’ ROSARY WH PRAYERS FOR ‘FULL ACCEPTANCE’ OF GAY UPL
- UNIVERSY REMOV PRIT WHO HOSTED ROSARY OF REPARATN FOR GAY PRI PARA
PRO-LGBT PRIT PROMOT ‘RABOW’ ROSARY WH PRAYERS FOR ‘FULL ACCEPTANCE’ OF GAY UPL
Scty of a group of protters at Bishop Salvatore Cordileone’s vis to the Ju School of Theology at the Graduate Theologil Unn last week has put the spotlight on a variant of the Rosary signed by homosexual activists to ntemplate what they ll the “Relatnal Mysteri.
Roland Strgfellow, the anizer of the GTU’s Center for Lbian and Gay Studi; Rev. The California Catholic Daily also reports a hab among relig homosexual activists of terpretg the relatnship between Ruth and Naomi as a homosexual one. The Roman Catholic Church, the largt Christian nomatn the Uned Stat wh an timated 62 ln members, has weled celibate gay and lbian people to s church life but creasgly is beg more tolerant even of this populatn.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, a text which ntas dogmas and teachgs of the Church, nam “homosexual acts” as “trsilly immoral and ntrary to the natural law, ” and nam “homosexual tennci” as “objectively disorred. ” While the Catholic Church do not nsir “homosexual orientatn” sful and of self, do have a very negative attu toward . The 1986 Letter stat, “Although the particular clatn of the homosexual person is not a s, is a more or ls strong tenncy orred toward an trsic moral evil; and th the clatn self mt be seen as an objective disorr.
UNIVERSY REMOV PRIT WHO HOSTED ROSARY OF REPARATN FOR GAY PRI PARA
The Catechism further stat that “Homosexual persons are lled to chasty. ” The Vatin’s polici, however, state that those wh “homosexual tennci...
A 2005 Vatin document, approved by then Pope Benedict XVI, stcted that the Church “nnot adm to the semary or to holy orrs those who practice homosexualy, prent ep-seated homosexual tennci or support the so-lled ‘gay culture. ” ment––ma rponse to a qutn about the acceptabily of gay men as prits––his statement is not official church teachg. Today, many men’s relig orrs and some bishops often make their own cisns regardg gay men as ndidat for the semary and prithood.