"Beg gay is not a s" is the mantra that one young Harvard stunt is tryg to promulgate. But while Matthew V has attracted a growg followg wh his accsible, scholarly arguments, evangelil scholars don't believe he'll make much headway the Christian muny.
Contents:
- IS BEG GAY A S?
- WHY IT’S NOT A S TO BE GAYHOW THE CHURCH MANUFACTUR SS GOD NEVER CREATEDKEH MICHAEL·FOLLOWPUBLISHED ILLUMINATION·12 M READ·MAY 5, 2022--21SHAREIMAGE BY STOKKETE VIA DEPOSPHOTOSIN THE NEVER-ENDG BATE BETWEEN CHRISTIAN EVANGELILS AND PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY READ THE BIBLE, NO ISSUE IS MORE SHOVED OUR FAC THAN THE CHURCH-MANUFACTURED “S” OF BEG GAY. (I E “GAY” AS AN UMBRELLA TERM FOR ANYONE NOT STRAIGHT.)“AH, THE CHURCH DIDN’T MANUFACTURE THAT S, KEH. IT’S THE BIBLE!”AND SO ARE A LOT OF OTHER “SS”, LAWS, AND MANDS, EVEN SOME OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS, THAT THE CHURCH UTTERLY IGNORES, AS CHERRY-PICKS S WAY TO FOLLOWG WHICH PARTS OF THE BIBLE WANTS AND WHICH PARTS ARE JT TOO JEWISH FOR TO STOMACH.THE CHURCH FIANTLY BLOWS OFF THE 4TH COMMANDMENT TO KEEP THE 7TH DAY HOLY. NO, THE CHURCH WORSHIPS ON DI SOLIS, SUN’S DAY, THE PAGAN 1ST DAY OF THE WEEK. HYPOCRIL MUCH?RIGHT NEXT TO WHERE THE BIBLE SAYS ’S A S TO BE GAY, THE SAME BIBLE ALSO SAYS ’S A S TO SHAVE YOUR BEARD. YET SHAVG IS NOT A S TO THE CHURCH.CHERRY-PICK MUCH?THE FACT IS, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WH SO-LLED “CHERRY-PICKG” OM THE BIBLE BEE THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT J AND THE APOSTL DID! MORE ON THIS A MOMENT …THE REASON YOU AND I N ED “CHERRY-PICK” OM THE BIBLE IS THAT WE DON’T NSIR THE WHOLE BIBLE TO BE WHOLLY SPIRED BY GOD, WE DON’T SEE THE CHURCH’S BIBLE AS ERRANT S EVERY WORD. BEE ’S NOT.BUT EVANGELILS, OR SO-LLED “BIBLIL CHRISTIANS”, DO BELIEVE THAT THE BIBLE IS THE SPIRED “WORD OF GOD” S ENTIRETY. IT IS THEY WHO BEE HYPOCR WHEN CHERRY-PICKG WHAT THEY WANT TO BELIEVE AND IGNORG WHAT THEY DON’T WANT TO SEE.LET’S DIG A B EPER TO THIS WHOLE CHERRY-PICKG BS.IS THE BIBLE REALLY WHOUT ERROR?
- POPE FRANCIS SAYS HOMOSEXUALY "IS NOT A CRIME," BUT GAY SEX IS "A S"
- IS IT A S TO BE GAY?
IS BEG GAY A S?
Is beg gay a s? Is a s to be gay? Is sful to have same-sex-attractns? * gay not a sin *
Some bibl were terpreted wh the translator’s view of homosexualy md or they were fluenced by the polics of the time that versn was translated.
Do not be ceived: neher the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexualy, nor thiev, nor the greedy, nor dnkards, nor revilers, nor swdlers will her the kgdom of God.
WHY IT’S NOT A S TO BE GAYHOW THE CHURCH MANUFACTUR SS GOD NEVER CREATEDKEH MICHAEL·FOLLOWPUBLISHED ILLUMINATION·12 M READ·MAY 5, 2022--21SHAREIMAGE BY STOKKETE VIA DEPOSPHOTOSIN THE NEVER-ENDG BATE BETWEEN CHRISTIAN EVANGELILS AND PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY READ THE BIBLE, NO ISSUE IS MORE SHOVED OUR FAC THAN THE CHURCH-MANUFACTURED “S” OF BEG GAY. (I E “GAY” AS AN UMBRELLA TERM FOR ANYONE NOT STRAIGHT.)“AH, THE CHURCH DIDN’T MANUFACTURE THAT S, KEH. IT’S THE BIBLE!”AND SO ARE A LOT OF OTHER “SS”, LAWS, AND MANDS, EVEN SOME OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS, THAT THE CHURCH UTTERLY IGNORES, AS CHERRY-PICKS S WAY TO FOLLOWG WHICH PARTS OF THE BIBLE WANTS AND WHICH PARTS ARE JT TOO JEWISH FOR TO STOMACH.THE CHURCH FIANTLY BLOWS OFF THE 4TH COMMANDMENT TO KEEP THE 7TH DAY HOLY. NO, THE CHURCH WORSHIPS ON DI SOLIS, SUN’S DAY, THE PAGAN 1ST DAY OF THE WEEK. HYPOCRIL MUCH?RIGHT NEXT TO WHERE THE BIBLE SAYS ’S A S TO BE GAY, THE SAME BIBLE ALSO SAYS ’S A S TO SHAVE YOUR BEARD. YET SHAVG IS NOT A S TO THE CHURCH.CHERRY-PICK MUCH?THE FACT IS, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WH SO-LLED “CHERRY-PICKG” OM THE BIBLE BEE THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT J AND THE APOSTL DID! MORE ON THIS A MOMENT …THE REASON YOU AND I N ED “CHERRY-PICK” OM THE BIBLE IS THAT WE DON’T NSIR THE WHOLE BIBLE TO BE WHOLLY SPIRED BY GOD, WE DON’T SEE THE CHURCH’S BIBLE AS ERRANT S EVERY WORD. BEE ’S NOT.BUT EVANGELILS, OR SO-LLED “BIBLIL CHRISTIANS”, DO BELIEVE THAT THE BIBLE IS THE SPIRED “WORD OF GOD” S ENTIRETY. IT IS THEY WHO BEE HYPOCR WHEN CHERRY-PICKG WHAT THEY WANT TO BELIEVE AND IGNORG WHAT THEY DON’T WANT TO SEE.LET’S DIG A B EPER TO THIS WHOLE CHERRY-PICKG BS.IS THE BIBLE REALLY WHOUT ERROR?
Matthew V is a 22-year-old gay Christian who believ beg gay is not a s. He me to that ncln after two years of studyg Scripture and the works of dozens of biblil scholars. The Harvard Universy stunt, currently on leave of absence, is now tryg to w over fellow believers not jt wh an emotnal ttimony but wh what he is prentg as biblilly solid arguments. * gay not a sin *
We are agast any s that rtras people om everlastg joy God, and homosexual practice jt gets all the prs bee, at this cultural moment, ’s the ma s that is so hly endorsed our ntext by the powers that be.
POPE FRANCIS SAYS HOMOSEXUALY "IS NOT A CRIME," BUT GAY SEX IS "A S"
In the never-endg bate between Christian Evangelils and people who actually read the Bible, no issue is more shoved our fac than the Church-manufactured “s” of beg gay. (I e “Gay” as… * gay not a sin *
Distancg ourselv om both the left and the right, we don’t celebrate homosexual practice; we acknowledge God’s clear revealed word that is s. Wh the past fifty years, the term gay, as applied to homosexualy, has explod to mastream culture, and we are told that “beg gay” is as much outsi one’s ntrol as “beg short” or havg blon hair.
The problem wh same-sex attractn, or the feelg of “beg gay, ” is that is an attractn to somethg God has forbidn, and any sire for somethg sful ultimately has s roots s. Some people, who adm to havg thoughts of “beg gay, ” are, for a variety of reasons, not romantilly attracted to members of the oppose sex.
In elementary and middle schools, is now fashnable to ll onelf “gay” or “bi” or e any number of other faddish sexual labels whout any real unrstandg of their meang—or of the moral and eternal implitns.
IS IT A S TO BE GAY?
* gay not a sin *
Acrdg to the article, “The word ‘arsenokoai’ shows up two different vers the bible, but was not translated to mean ‘homosexual’ until 1946. ” In fact, the vers date back to about 500 years ago, the webse which wrote this article actually spoke wh Ed Oxford about the word, and the g of the word, “homosexual. And as Oxford soon disvered while readg other languag translatns of the word, ‘Arsenokoai, ’ actually means “boy molter” stead of “homosexual.
” Also found , “So we went to 1 Corthians to see how they translated arsenokoai (origal Greek word) and stead of homosexuals said, ‘Boy molters will not her the kgdom of God. So ncln, the word, arsenokoai, most likely do not actually translate to “homosexual, ” but stead translat to “pedophile, ” or “boy molter, ” and Levic 18:22 actually translat to, “Man shall not lie wh young boys as he do wh a woman, for is an abomatn. Followg Matthew V' terview will be rpons om evangelil theologians, and fally, gut ntributns om Christians who have chosen not to engage homosexualy and those who don't believe a gay liftyle nflicts wh the Bible.
"There is no ntradictn between beg Christian and beg gay, " he told arguments – maly agast six Bible passag that are monly ed by Christians to nmn homosexualy – are gag populary as evinced by his YouTube views. In six months, an over hour-long vio of V meticuloly challengg what he lls the tradnal terpretatn of Scripture has garnered nearly 400, 000 an terview wh The Christian Post, V ma clear that he believ that Christians who believe homosexualy is a s are wrong. "Lovg, same-sex relatnships" are not addrsed the Bible, let alone nmned, he distguish between ltful, sual homosexual behavr and lovg, "natural" same-sex relatnships, argug that is only the former behavr that the Bible speaks Wicha, Kan., rint has already changed some Christians' stance on homosexualy, cludg that of his vout Christian father, whom he me out to jt a uple years has stated that he was raised a lovg, Christian home – never molted or abed – and a church muny that holds the tradnal view of homosexualy.