The 'Gay Gene' Is A Myth But Beg Gay Is 'Natural,' Say Scientists

Contents:

• THE 'GAY GENE' IS A MYTH BUT BEG GAY IS 'NATURAL,' SAY SCIENTISTS
• BEG LGBTQIA IS NATURALTHE FALLACY BEHD THE THAT’S NOT NATURAL ARGUMENTGRAYSON BELL·FOLLOWPUBLISHED AN INJTICE!·3 M READ·JUN 7, 2020--2SHAREPHOTO BY BRIAN YURASS ON UNSPLASHOFTEN THE ARGUMENT AGAST THE LGBTQIA MUNY IS THAT BEG GAY, OR TRANSGENR IS GOG AGAST NATURE OR UNNATURAL.BEG BORN LBGTQIA IS NOT UNNATURALWHILE MOST OF THE HUMAN POPULATN IS STRAIGHT AND CISGENR, BEG GAY, BISEXUAL, OR TRANSGENR IS NOT UNNATURAL. BEG GAY HAPPENS OFTEN NATURE, AND SAME-SEX TERURSE HAS BEEN OBSERVED AT LEAST 1,500 DISTCT SPECI WORLDWI. THIS SHOWS THAT HOMOSEXUALY AND BISEXUALY ARE PLETELY NATURAL. THERE IS NOTHG UNNATURAL WH PEOPLE ENGAGG SAME-SEX RELATNSHIPS.THERE ARE ALSO MANY EXAMPL OF SPECI WHO EXHIB TERSEX TRAS, BUT ’S MORE DIFFICULT TO FD OTHER SPECI WHO MAY BE TRANSGENR. IT’S NOT LIKE WE N GO UP TO A LN AND ASK THEM WHAT THEIR GENR INTY IS.HOWEVER, THERE IS SOME EVINCE OF GEIC VARIANTS BETWEEN TRANSGENR AND CISGENR PEOPLE. IT APPEARS THAT TRANSGENR PEOPLE MAY HAVE DIFFERENC THEIR DNA PARED TO CISGENR PEOPLE, BUT REQUIR FURTHER STUDY. THERE HAVE ALSO BEEN STUDI WHERE BRA SNS ARE PARED BETWEEN TRANSGENR AND CISGENR BRAS. THE STUDI HAVE SHOWN THAT TRANSGENR BRAS ARE MORE CLOSELY NFIGURED TO THE GENR THE PERSON INTIFI AS, THAN TO THEIR BLOGIL SEX. REGARDLS, THERE IS MOUNTG EVINCE THAT TRANSGENR PEOPLE ARE BORN THE WAY WE ARE, MEANG THERE IS NOTHG UNNATURAL WH BEG TRANSGENR.NO MATTER WHERE SOMEONE FALLS UNR THE LGBTQ+ UMBRELLA, THERE IS MOUNTG EVINCE THAT ’S NATURAL TO BE BORN THAT WAY. THIS NEGAT THE ARGUMENT THAT BEG LGBTQ+ IS SOME WAY UNNATURAL.ASSUMG SOMETHG UNNATURAL IS BAD
• WHY ARE PEOPLE GAY? GAY BY CHOICE OR IS BEG GAY GEIC?
• THERE IS NO ‘GAY GENE.’ THERE IS NO ‘STRAIGHT GENE.’ SEXUALY IS JT PLEX, STUDY NFIRMS

THE 'GAY GENE' IS A MYTH BUT BEG GAY IS 'NATURAL,' SAY SCIENTISTS

The news this week that the largt study of s kd failed to nfirm the existence of a "gay gene" is not so much a disappotment for those lookg to unrstand the LGBTQ muny, as is an acknowledgement that science do not need to tell what should be plaly obv: gays, lbians, bisexuals and pansexuals are who they are. But here's the quote that will light opponents of LGBTQ rights, some of whom sist they n "nvert" gay people to choose to be straight by prayg the gay away:. "There is no ‘gay gene’ that term whether someone has same-sex partners, ” said Ganna, who is also a geicist at the Broad Instute of MIT and Harvard as well as the Universy of Helski.

While the variatns the gen are not enough to raise a rabow flag and label anyone as unqutnably gay, the rearchers say the blogil variants may at the very least partly fluence sexual behavr. This new rearch, he said “provis even more evince that beg gay or lbian is a natural part of human life, a ncln that has been drawn by rearchers and scientists time and aga.

This new rearch also renfirms the long tablished unrstandg that there is no nclive gree to which nature or nurture fluence how a gay or lbian person behav. Geics nnot tell "the whole story, " as Eric Vila, director of the Center for Geic Medice Rearch at Children’s Natnal Health System, told the Post, about what "mak" somebody gay.

BEG LGBTQIA IS NATURALTHE FALLACY BEHD THE THAT’S NOT NATURAL ARGUMENTGRAYSON BELL·FOLLOWPUBLISHED AN INJTICE!·3 M READ·JUN 7, 2020--2SHAREPHOTO BY BRIAN YURASS ON UNSPLASHOFTEN THE ARGUMENT AGAST THE LGBTQIA MUNY IS THAT BEG GAY, OR TRANSGENR IS GOG AGAST NATURE OR UNNATURAL.BEG BORN LBGTQIA IS NOT UNNATURALWHILE MOST OF THE HUMAN POPULATN IS STRAIGHT AND CISGENR, BEG GAY, BISEXUAL, OR TRANSGENR IS NOT UNNATURAL. BEG GAY HAPPENS OFTEN NATURE, AND SAME-SEX TERURSE HAS BEEN OBSERVED AT LEAST 1,500 DISTCT SPECI WORLDWI. THIS SHOWS THAT HOMOSEXUALY AND BISEXUALY ARE PLETELY NATURAL. THERE IS NOTHG UNNATURAL WH PEOPLE ENGAGG SAME-SEX RELATNSHIPS.THERE ARE ALSO MANY EXAMPL OF SPECI WHO EXHIB TERSEX TRAS, BUT ’S MORE DIFFICULT TO FD OTHER SPECI WHO MAY BE TRANSGENR. IT’S NOT LIKE WE N GO UP TO A LN AND ASK THEM WHAT THEIR GENR INTY IS.HOWEVER, THERE IS SOME EVINCE OF GEIC VARIANTS BETWEEN TRANSGENR AND CISGENR PEOPLE. IT APPEARS THAT TRANSGENR PEOPLE MAY HAVE DIFFERENC THEIR DNA PARED TO CISGENR PEOPLE, BUT REQUIR FURTHER STUDY. THERE HAVE ALSO BEEN STUDI WHERE BRA SNS ARE PARED BETWEEN TRANSGENR AND CISGENR BRAS. THE STUDI HAVE SHOWN THAT TRANSGENR BRAS ARE MORE CLOSELY NFIGURED TO THE GENR THE PERSON INTIFI AS, THAN TO THEIR BLOGIL SEX. REGARDLS, THERE IS MOUNTG EVINCE THAT TRANSGENR PEOPLE ARE BORN THE WAY WE ARE, MEANG THERE IS NOTHG UNNATURAL WH BEG TRANSGENR.NO MATTER WHERE SOMEONE FALLS UNR THE LGBTQ+ UMBRELLA, THERE IS MOUNTG EVINCE THAT ’S NATURAL TO BE BORN THAT WAY. THIS NEGAT THE ARGUMENT THAT BEG LGBTQ+ IS SOME WAY UNNATURAL.ASSUMG SOMETHG UNNATURAL IS BAD

But even if people are not "Born This Way, " as Lady Gaga sang, at last now we n jo Gloria Gaynor sgg, "I Am What I Am. Every year, Gallup releas a survey of how many Amerins intify as lbian, gay, bisexual or transgenr. Everyone will be eher gay or trans or nonnformg or whatever the list of 50 or 60 different optns there are.

” The edian Bill Maher said on his show that by 2054, if we follow what he se as the current trajectory, “we will all be gay, ” addg that the rise the number of younger people intifyg as transgenr seemed spic. Bee of the fluence of Schorr put siarly Natnal Review: “To suggt that social suggtibily uld be playg a role the skyrocketg numbers of young girls’ exprsg their sire to bee mal, for example, is not of urse to say that gay and transgenr people would not exist whout the topics’ beg discsed the public square.

”This fear is based on an unrstandg of genr and sexualy as alarmgly agile, easily undone by a gay teacher or a trans TikTok fluencer. And so are homosexualy, bisexualy and beg ’s been an objective crease the number of visible L.

WHY ARE PEOPLE GAY? GAY BY CHOICE OR IS BEG GAY GEIC?

This is the first time Amerin history that gay and trans people have been able to live as themselv any real way, wh jobs and marriag and dogs and ts and visibily. Reproductn is the purpose of sex; same-sex terurse nnot produce offsprg; ergo, homosexualy is unnatural. If is sful to have non-reproductive sex, then the ire of anti-gay groups should be directed at the people as well.

Likewise, while a gay male may not reproduce, ’s been noted that his female relativ are often more reproductively succsful, so ’s theorized that one gene that may ntribute to homosexualy when rried by a man also ntribut to reproductive succs when rried by a woman.

Homosexualy is ed by childhood abe, parental neglect or emotnal distance, and other factors of upbrgg, not blogil factors.

THERE IS NO ‘GAY GENE.’ THERE IS NO ‘STRAIGHT GENE.’ SEXUALY IS JT PLEX, STUDY NFIRMS

As Alan Chambers, print of Exod Internatnal (the once preement but now funct ex-gay therapy program), put 2012, “The majory of people that I have met, and I would say the majory meang 99. Des of scientific rearch have failed to fd a “gay gene” or a sole blogil e for same-sex attractn.