A ld prevalent the gay muny triggered by the dissolutn of Pri Month" name="Dcriptn" property="og:scriptn
Contents:
GAY LD
A memo wrten to the Secretary of State 1950 stated that no evince had been found to support the claim that LGBTQ+ people were any threat to natnal secury, and yet “the tenncy toward character weakns has led to the ncln that the known homosexual is unsued for employment the Department.
3 Many thought if you were openly gay, you were more spectable to Soviet blackmail. The Mattache Society's missn was, “to ‘unify homosexuals‘ [and] to erase om our law books the discrimatory and opprsive legislatn…”6 The founrs also regnized that there was an LGBTQ+ culture that should be celebrated. Sued and 1958 the Supreme Court extend the right of ee speech to the gay prs, markg the first LGBTQ+ rights victory the Supreme Court.
One article listed the pros of picketg as prott, statg: “For three years the CSC (Civil Service Commissn) had been explicly refg to meet wh spokmen for the homosexual muny… After the picketg the CSC agreed to a meetg. The mistst and discrimatn that gay and trans people faced was another example of that sentiment.