Father Jam Mart: Gay Pri Compatible wh Sacred Heart of J

Contents:

• GAY PRITS: BREAKG THE SILENCE
• THE CLEAR RPONSE OF A PRIT TO FR. JAM MART FOR SUPPORTG 'GAY PRI'
• FATHER JAM MART: GAY PRI COMPATIBLE WH SACRED HEART OF J
• FR. JAM MART’S BIG GAY INTERVIEW
• OPENLY GAY CATHOLIC PRIT DISCS POPE FRANCIS' APPEAL FOR LGBTQ PROTECTNS
• RICKY MART IS A PROUD GAY FATHER — MEET HIS FOUR KIDS BORN VIA SURROGATE
• I’M EX-GAY. FR. JAM MART’S LGBT AFFIRMATN PERVERTS THE GOSPEL, ENSLAV SOULS S
• JU PRIT STANDS UP FOR GAY CATHOLICS, THEN FAC BACKLASH

GAY PRITS: BREAKG THE SILENCE

And a different vio, the pro-gay prit has said gog to a gay weddg is no worse than gog to a Jewish weddg, referrg to as "a different tradn, " addg that refg to attend a gay weddg is "very surprisg to me.

THE CLEAR RPONSE OF A PRIT TO FR. JAM MART FOR SUPPORTG 'GAY PRI'

Father Mart was speakg to a homosexual person who said he was planng his "weddg" and whose liftyle had prevly been opposed by his parents but who now plans on walkg him down the aisle.

Both secular and tablishment Catholic media me to his fense, cludg The New York Tim, which published an article wh the headle "Ju Prit Stands Up for Gay Catholics, Then Fac Backlash. " The Mother Church of the Plist Fathers, Sat Pl the Apostle New York Cy, has a notor gay mistry lled Out at Sat Pl.

FATHER JAM MART: GAY PRI COMPATIBLE WH SACRED HEART OF J

Do God posively will that some people posss and act upon homosexual sir as their natural, rrectly orred sexualy?

FR. JAM MART’S BIG GAY INTERVIEW

Father, when you tweeted “Pri Month” greetgs to your “LGBTQ iends, ” urgg them to be “proud” of their “God-given digny” and “gifts” and their “place the world, ” did you mean to suate that homosexualy is a gift om God and th somethg to embrace?

OPENLY GAY CATHOLIC PRIT DISCS POPE FRANCIS' APPEAL FOR LGBTQ PROTECTNS

In fact, prohibg homosexual acts (as the Church do) would be immoral, bee would prevent people om beg who God ma them to be and dog what God wants them to do. Then would make sense to advote for the -stigmatizatn of homosexualy and to enurage those wh SSA to fully actualize their attractns as a liftyle. This uld expla your nsistent support for Catholic gay mistri that affirm homosexual activy while ignorg or throwg sha on those that don’t.

It would also provi ntext for your reference to homosexualy as “a lovg act, a form of love… that I have to reverence.

RICKY MART IS A PROUD GAY FATHER — MEET HIS FOUR KIDS BORN VIA SURROGATE

If you thk that homosexualy is not a nature given by God, do not have a sexual exprsn that is moral and orred to a person’s happs, then the only other optn is that is unnatural, that s sexual exprsns are immoral, and that, however mixed wh real iendship or real virtu may be any given suatn, ’s ultimately orred away om happs.

I’M EX-GAY. FR. JAM MART’S LGBT AFFIRMATN PERVERTS THE GOSPEL, ENSLAV SOULS S

In which se, don’t sayg that gay people are born that way, and sistg on g the gay-affirmative language that people wh SSA “e for themselv, ” have the effect of affirmg people what will make them unhappy? So when you refer to a man and “his hband” and their child; when you are chronilly silent on the legal movements to refe marriage and fay spe your fluential Catholic profile on the issue; when we do the math and realize that endorsg same-sex marriage is the only logil end pot of endorsg homosexualy as God-given and natural—’s only fair to wonr whether you assent to this teachg. That would jibe wh, for example, your stated wish to a gay man that “ ten years you will be able to kiss your partner… soon to be your hband” church.

JU PRIT STANDS UP FOR GAY CATHOLICS, THEN FAC BACKLASH

Is the full package: nmnatn of homosexual acts as disorred and trsilly immoral, affirmatn that our sexual faculti are orred toward maral love between a man and a woman, a basic biblil anthropology of sexual difference and plementary, and so on? This would make sense of your claim that “for a teachg to be really thorative is expected that will be received by the people of God, ” but that Catholic teachg on homosexualy hasn’t been “received” by the “LGBT muny. Or maybe you’re holdg on to a mental rervatn which the “Church teachg” to which you claim assent is actually what you thk Church teachg should be, or what you thk ’s gog to be—once the Church fally sheds all s old homophobic hangups.

Bee when you say that you “will not challenge” Church teachg on homosexualy and even lay out that teachg imprsive tail, most people n figure out that this isn’t the same as sayg you agree wh , that you endorse and promote , and that you aren’t subtly— ways that don’t rise to the level of a “challenge”—workg to change .