In a historic cisn for the gay right's movement, the Supreme Court led on Friday that the U.S. Constutn grants same-sex upl the right to marry. Jtice Anthony M. Kennedy, who wrote the majory opn, said that gay and lbian upl have a fundamental right to marry.
Contents:
- US SUPREME COURT TO LE ON GAY MARRIAGE
- THE SUPREME COURT DECLAR GAY MARRIAGE IS A RIGHT
- 2 JTIC SLAM URT'S 2015 CISN GAY MARRIAGE SE
- ‘IT IS SO ORRED.’ SUPREME COURT JTIC ON GAY MARRIAGE CISN
- ‘IT IS SO ORRED.’ SUPREME COURT JTIC ON GAY MARRIAGE CISN
- GAY MARRIAGE CLARED LEGAL ACROSS THE US HISTORIC SUPREME URT LG
- GAY MARRIAGE THE US SUPREME COURT: OBERGEFELL V. HODG
US SUPREME COURT TO LE ON GAY MARRIAGE
The US Supreme Court will le the next few months on whether gay upl have a right to marry across all stat. * gay marriage supreme court decision 2015 *
Image source, Getty ImagImage ptn, The urt uld effectively make gay marriage legal across the untryThe US Supreme Court will le this year on whether gay upl have a right to marry across all jtic said they would hear a bed se about marriage bans four a supreme urt lg on the s uld fully legalise gay marriage the urt prevly stck down a US law preventg feral regnn of marriag stat allowg same-sex unns.
After that lg, a wave of cisns the regnal feral appeals urts end numero state gay marriage bans. Fourteen state bans Friday, the jtic said they would take up s om gay and lbian platiffs Kentucky, Michigan, Oh and Tennsee. Image source, Getty ImagImage ptn, Gay marriage supporters cheered the June 2013 lg that stck down a law limg regnn of the unnsIn November, a US appeals urt overturned lgs strikg down marriage bans those four stat, the first appeals urt to do so sce the Supreme Court's ial gay marriage US high urt prevly cled to tervene s that had ma to the appeals urt level, effectively allowg marriag to go two-and-a-half hours of arguments, the jtic will nsir two related qutns - whether the US nstutn requir stat to issue marriage licenc to gay and lbian upl and whether stat mt regnise such marriag performed other se will be argued April and a cisn is expected by late on this story.
THE SUPREME COURT DECLAR GAY MARRIAGE IS A RIGHT
In a momento day for civil rights, the Supreme Court of the Uned Stat led Friday that the Constutn effectively grants all Amerin cizens the right to get married—cludg same-sex upl. All The Celebri Who Are Thrilled About the Supreme Court's Decisn to Legalize Gay Marriage The 5-to-4 cisn is a landmark w for the gay rights' movement. Prr to the cisn, gay marriage was regnized at the state level 37 stat and the District of Colombia—see a map here. In the majory opn, Jtice Anthony M. Kennedy wr: "No unn is more profound than marriage, for embodi the hight ials of love, fily, votn, sacrifice, and fay. ... [The challengers] ask for equal digny the ey of the law. The Constutn grants them that right." Here's how polis are celebratg on social media: Proud to celebrate a historic victory for marriage equaly—& the urage & termatn of LGBT Amerins who ma possible. -H— Hillary Clton (@HillaryClton) June 26, 2015 Today is a big step our march toward equaly. Gay and lbian upl now have the right to marry, jt like anyone else. #LoveWs— Print Obama (@POTUS) June 26, 2015 Congratulatns to all who * gay marriage supreme court decision 2015 *
For same-sex upl the 13 stat that didn't prevly regnize gay marriage, the lg will mean major chang some key areas:Adoptn RightsIn the stat where same-sex upl weren't allowed to marry, they often weren't allowed to adopt children together; one parent would do the adoptg, and some s, the send parents' rights were limbo. ) "That's gog to feel amazg, " says Kirsten, who liv wh her wife of six years Geia, where their marriage (performed at Cy Hall New York Cy) wasn't prevly ProtectnIt's gog to be harr to be anti-gay: Most stat, for example, have laws place that bar discrimatn on the grounds of maral stat—but stat didn't prevly regnize gay marriage, those laws didn't apply to same-sex upl. (This was particularly problematic for a sick person wh an anti-gay fay who he may not even have a relatnship wh.
DivorceIn the past, if you lived a state that didn't regnize gay marriage, that state wouldn't grant you a gay divorce. That meant that upl the middle of break-up wouldn't get the benefs of divorce laws, which are meant to protect a uple and their assets as they spl—unls they moved and tablished rincy (which n take months to years) a state that regnized gay marriage. ”Wh Gsburg’s ath and the retirement of Jtice Anthony Kennedy 2018, only three members of the majory the gay marriage se rema: Jtic Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
2 JTIC SLAM URT'S 2015 CISN GAY MARRIAGE SE
In a long-sought victory for the gay rights movement, the urt led, 5-4, that the Constutn guarante a right to same-sex marriage. * gay marriage supreme court decision 2015 *
Barrett’s nfirmatn would cement a 6-3 nservative majory on the urt, and she has pared her approach to the law generally to that of her mentor, Jtice Anton Slia, one of the dissenters the gay marriage se. Reversg the urt’s cisn the gay marriage se would seem a tall orr, but Thomas’ statement unrsred liberals’ fears that the urt uld roll back some of their harst-fought s the jtic spent about two and a half hours discsg Monday, however, were far ls proment: a water dispute between Texas and New Mexi and a se volvg a provisn of the Delaware nstutn that keeps the number of state judg affiliated wh the two major polil parti fairly even. “The Supreme Court’s cisn is a huge victory for same-sex upl the US that will reverberate many untri that still ny people the right to marry the person they love, ” said Boris Dtrich, lbian, gay, bisexual, and transgenr (LGBT) rights advocy director at Human Rights Watch.
‘IT IS SO ORRED.’ SUPREME COURT JTIC ON GAY MARRIAGE CISN
In a historic cisn for the gay right's movement, the Supreme Court led on Friday that the U.S. Constutn grants same-sex upl the right to marry. Jtice Anthony M. Kennedy, who wrote the majory opn, said that gay and lbian upl have a fundamental right to marry. * gay marriage supreme court decision 2015 *
The Supreme Court’s cisn overturns the lower urt’s cisn, lg that the bans vlated the nstutnal right of gays and lbians to equal protectn unr the law. By one vote, the urt l that same-sex marriage nnot be banned the Uned Stat and that all same-sex marriag mt be regnized natnwi, fally grantg same-sex upl equal rights to heterosexual upl unr the 1971, jt two years after the Stonewall Rts that unofficially marked the begng of the stggle for gay rights and marriage equaly, the Mnota Supreme Court had found same-sex marriage bans nstutnal, a precent which the Supreme Court had never challenged.
‘IT IS SO ORRED.’ SUPREME COURT JTIC ON GAY MARRIAGE CISN
* gay marriage supreme court decision 2015 *
As homosexualy gradually beme more accepted Amerin culture, the nservative backlash was strong enough to force Print Bill Clton to sign the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), prohibg the regnn of same-sex marriag at the feral level, to law 1996. Gay marriage was the predomant "culture war" issue of Gee W. Obergefell origated wh a gay uple, Jim Obergefell and John Arthur, who were married Maryland, where same-sex marriage was legal, but whose marriage was not regnized by Oh thori.
GAY MARRIAGE CLARED LEGAL ACROSS THE US HISTORIC SUPREME URT LG
Comparg that evolutn to society's views of gays and lbians, Kennedy noted that for years, "a tthful claratn by same-sex upl of what was their hearts had to rema unspoken. Gay and lbian upl now have the right to marry, jt like anyone else. Together, they volve a dozen upl who challenged same-sex marriage bans Oh, Michigan, Kentucky and Tennsee — the only stat wh bans on marriage between gay and lbian upl that had been staed by a feral appeals urt.
GAY MARRIAGE THE US SUPREME COURT: OBERGEFELL V. HODG
Before Friday's lg, gay marriage had already been ma legal 37 stat and the District of Columbia — by eher legislative or voter actn or by feral urts that overturned state' bans. As NPR's Na Totenberg reported when the Supreme Court heard the current se back April, nservative jtic had poted qutns for the attorneys: "Jtice Slia asked whether misters would be able to refe to marry two gay men. He said, but that uld happen — uld happen that a mister would be forced to marry two gay men, vlatn of his beliefs.
"Jtice Alo asked, well then why not marry four gay men together? The urt noted the change thkg, statg: "Well to the 20th century, many Stat nmned same-sex timacy as immoral, and homosexualy was treated as an illns. Qutns about the legal treatment of gays and lbians soon reached the urts, where they uld be discsed the formal disurse of the law.
Ernment to provi the same benefs to both gay and heterosexual upl. AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTPooja Mandagere, left, and Natalie Thompson outsi the Supreme Court on Friday after led favor of same-sex Mills/The New York TimSli 1 of 14 Pooja Mandagere, left, and Natalie Thompson outsi the Supreme Court on Friday after led favor of same-sex Mills/The New York TimJune 26, 2015WASHINGTON — In a long-sought victory for the gay rights movement, the Supreme Court led by a 5-to-4 vote on Friday that the Constutn guarante a right to same-sex marriage.