When even Ellen DeGener assum that Calyn Jenner supports gay rights, 's clear we're nfed. Perhaps 's time to cut the rd
Contents:
- “TRANS? WHY NOT GAY?”: ADDRSG SOME MISUNRSTANDGS
- THERE ARE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENC BETWEEN GAY AND TRANS INTI
- NO, TRANS IS NOT ‘THE NEW GAY’
- LIVGTOPICSALL LIVGSAVAGE LOVETRAVELASTROLOGYFROM THE VLTHEALTHSTYLELGBT+SEX & ROMANCEBT OF VANUVERTRANSPORATNCARTOONSHOMELS VANUVER SAVAGE LOVE COLUMNDO SEX WH A TRANS WOMAN MAKE ME GAY?
“TRANS? WHY NOT GAY?”: ADDRSG SOME MISUNRSTANDGS
* trans but not gay *
Not transgenr — people, I thought wise to share my thoughts on the qutn that I thk the transgenr muny should start by answerg is: why is no longer enough to be accepted as a femized man or a masculized woman, somethg that s of stggl for homosexual rights has managed to achieve?
THERE ARE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENC BETWEEN GAY AND TRANS INTI
Why should we have a small mory of homosexuals today bee heterosexuals by beg a “real” woman or a “real” man? Isn’t this need to fall to le, to nform to the bary norms of sexualy, ntrary to what femist and gay movements have always sought?
NO, TRANS IS NOT ‘THE NEW GAY’
When she, for stance, lls trans men and women “a small mory of homosexuals, ” she’s prumg that trans muni are primarily heterosexual.
LIVGTOPICSALL LIVGSAVAGE LOVETRAVELASTROLOGYFROM THE VLTHEALTHSTYLELGBT+SEX & ROMANCEBT OF VANUVERTRANSPORATNCARTOONSHOMELS VANUVER SAVAGE LOVE COLUMNDO SEX WH A TRANS WOMAN MAKE ME GAY?
Barely 15% of trans muni are heterosexual: 32% are bisexual or pansexual, 16% are gay, 10% are asexual, and 21% are queer — a large tegory that enpass bisexualy, pansexualy, and homosexualy. Helpg trans people accept their bodi, a practice now nsired a form of reparative therapy parable to those practiced on gay people, “has been attempted” the 1960s and 1970s “whout succs, particularly the long term, ” to borrow the words of the World Profsnal Associatn for Transgenr Health.
In his ntributn, Mr Smh argu that there are parallels between beg gay as an inty, and beg transgenr as an inty, and that both s, this should be the basis for protectg rights and benefs for the people ncerned. Givg gay people the rights and benefs tradnally afford to straight people don’t take anythg signifint away om straight people. There’s no qutn that trans people should have all human rights; however, when to benefs, givg trans women some of the benefs afford to femal—for stance, accs to sex-segregated spac and rourc—do seem to remove some benefs and even rights om femal; or so I argue my here I want to ncentrate on Mr Smh’s ia that there are parallels between gay and transgenr inty.
He pots out that the ia of beg gay as an inty, the sense of beg a fundamental part of onelf, only emerged relatively late on the long history of sexual activy between people of the same sex. However, I thk we also need to pture an ambiguy between two possible sens which “beg gay” n unt as an inty, or fundamental part of first sense refers to beg gay as a sexual orientatn, and is generalised to all gay people, as such. The same pot appli to beg heterosexual or send, different sense which beg gay n unt as part of your “inty” is as a matter of beg highly personally meangful for you.