Elie Honig wr that Monday’s Supreme Court lg that feral law prohibs discrimatn agast gay and transgenr people the workplace is a monumental step forward toward jtice and equaly – and is potentially a watershed moment for the urt self.
Contents:
- GAY RIGHTS VS. FREE SPEECHSUPREME COURT BACKS WEB DIGNER OPPOSED TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
- SCOTUS: GORSUCH, ROBERTS JO LIBERALS TO LE THAT CIVIL RIGHTS LAW PROTECTS GAY AND TRANSGENR EMPLOYE, TOO
GAY RIGHTS VS. FREE SPEECHSUPREME COURT BACKS WEB DIGNER OPPOSED TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
“The worry is that this provis a green light to any bs owner that they n refe service to any person on the basis of their inty, whether they’re gay or lbian, or Jewish or Black, or anythg, bee they have an objectn to those sorts of people beg their bs, ” said Kathere Franke, a profsor at Columbia Law School. In 2020, Gorsuch livered a massive w to the LGBTQ muny when he livered the majory opn a se that extend feral protectns to gay, lbian and transgenr workers. Monday’s Supreme Court lg that feral law prohibs discrimatn agast gay and transgenr people the workplace is a monumental step forward toward jtice and equaly – and is potentially a watershed moment for the urt self.
SCOTUS: GORSUCH, ROBERTS JO LIBERALS TO LE THAT CIVIL RIGHTS LAW PROTECTS GAY AND TRANSGENR EMPLOYE, TOO
Clayton County, is powerful s plaspoken logic and clear-eyed view of equaly: “An employer who fir an dividual for beg homosexual or transgenr fir that person for tras or actns would not have qutned members of a different sex.
The opn also stands as a sharp rebe to the Tmp admistratn, whose Jtice Department argued the Supreme Court last year that the law do not protect gay and transgenr people agast discrimatn. ImageLorie Smh said her Christian fah requir her to turn away ctomers seekg servic to celebrate same-sex Woolf for The New York TimThe Supreme Court sid on Friday wh a web signer Colorado who said she had a First Amendment right to refe to sign weddg webs for same-sex upl spe a state law that forbids discrimatn agast gay people. ’”The se, though amed as a clash between ee speech and gay rights, was the latt a seri of cisns favor of relig people and groups, notably nservative cisn also appeared to suggt that the rights of L.