View Tt prep - Phil 201 Exam 4 om PHIL PHIL-201 at Virgia Commonwealth Universy. Qutn 1 Needs Gradg Expla Gay-Williams' e of his argument om nature. Are
Contents:
- SUMMARY OF J. GAY WILLIAMS’ “THE WRONGFULNS OF EUTHANASIA”
- REFLECTN ON J GAY-WILLIAMS’ “THE WRONGFULNS OF EUTHANASIA”
SUMMARY OF J. GAY WILLIAMS’ “THE WRONGFULNS OF EUTHANASIA”
I Introductn In the article “The Wrongfulns of Euthanasia”, J. Gay-Williams asserts the tablished view on thanasia and f the ethil permissibily of thanasia a new way. * j gay williams euthanasia quizlet *
Gay Williams rejects the view that “that if someone (and others) would be better off ad, then mt be all right to kill that person. ” For Gay-Williams thanasia (E) is tentnal or liberate killg, not accintal killg or lettg one die.
Gay-Williams asserts the tablished view on thanasia and f the ethil permissibily of thanasia a new way. In the end, I believe the article is unsuccsful and will expla and fend my crique (IV) Summary Gay-Williams is addrsg the problem of tablished moral views on thanasia.
REFLECTN ON J GAY-WILLIAMS’ “THE WRONGFULNS OF EUTHANASIA”
Gay-Williams provis three arguments to show how such a view ntribut towards vlatn of the nature and digny of human begs.
Acrdg to Gay-Williams, thanasia is an act of takg a human life, eher someone’s or one’s own. (Gay-Williams 1)III Evaluatn In hop of assigng thanasia to a morally wrong tegory of actns, J.
Gay-Williams provis three arguments to fend his view: The argument om nature, the argument om self-tert, and the argument om practil effects. Gay-Williams claims that “A person hopelsly ill may be allowed to take his own life.