Do we need laws forbiddg the "gay" sult?
Contents:
- THE SOLUTN TO "GAY" INSULTS: FREEDOM OF SPEECH
- ANTI-GAY HATE CRIM FELL SLIGHTLY 2020, WHILE ANTI-TRANS CRIM ROSE, FBI SAYS
- LGBT HATE CRIM DOUBLE RSIA AFTER BAN ON 'GAY PROPAGANDA'
THE SOLUTN TO "GAY" INSULTS: FREEDOM OF SPEECH
In the Uned Stat between 2004 and 2009, 42 urt s were cid that volved claims of homosexualy as famatn. Comparatively, 59 s were cid durg the prev 150 years. Dpe: 1) judg three stat lg is not famatory to ll someone gay; 2) the Supreme Court strikg down sodomy laws natnwi 2003 via Lawrence v. * is calling someone gay a hate crime *
Five gay, male iends, some of whom were wearg makp and jewelry, were exg a well-known gay bar when they were approached by a group of men who were unknown to them.
If an onle crime is motivated by homophobia, biphobia or transphobia, is a hate crime regardls of whether the person targeted inti as LGBT+. Bullyg, abe, harassment, hostily or hatred that may not be a crime but is homophobic, biphobic or transphobic n still be reported to the police to rerd as a non-crimal ‘hate cint’.
In the Uned Stat between 2004 and 2009, 42 urt s were cid that volved claims of homosexualy as famatn.
ANTI-GAY HATE CRIM FELL SLIGHTLY 2020, WHILE ANTI-TRANS CRIM ROSE, FBI SAYS
* is calling someone gay a hate crime *
Dpe: 1) judg three stat lg is not famatory to ll someone gay; 2) the Supreme Court strikg down sodomy laws natnwi 2003 via Lawrence v. Texas, thereby removg sodomy and the implitn of crimal activy as a jtifitn for famatn; and 3) posive shifts public opn about gays and lbians the U. And numero policy chang at the lol, state, and feral levels, there has been a dramatic crease the number of famatn s pertag to claims of homosexualy but paratively few answers provid by urts as to why.
Feral and state famatn lgs regardg claims of homosexualy did not parallel other legal advancements and posive shifts public attus toward gay men and lbians.
LGBT HATE CRIM DOUBLE RSIA AFTER BAN ON 'GAY PROPAGANDA'
Among the s analyzed, one portn of which clud fendants’ verbal and/or wrten accatns of platiffs’ prumed or affirmed sexual orientatn, behavr, or inti, claims of homosexualy as famatory failed 38 out of 42 s bee judg granted summary judgment for the fendants, dismissed the s altogether, or nclud that statements were not pable of beg famatory. Overwhelmgly, judg failed to directly addrs whether claims of homosexualy are famatory today, a liberate oversight that is problematic for several reasons. When judg or state legislatur choose not to addrs whether imputatns of homosexualy are famatory, all are left wh an plete picture of the issue, which may turn rult both a higher number of famatn s and more nfn the ongog equaly battle.