Same-sex relatnships have already signifintly altered fay law, by leadg to new formal relatnship stat and rporatn of the prciple that both of a child’s legal parents n be of the same sex. This say explor further chang that may lie ahead as same-sex marriage bat creasgly affect both fay law and the social meangs of marriage. Marriage as an stutn has changed most dramatilly bee of the cumulative effects of the last half-century of -genrg fay law. Same-sex marriage–and perhaps even more so, the highly visible cultural bate over –is ntributg to this procs. The thor argu that the greatt potential for chang social meang will arise three areas for which there is empiril evince of signifint differenc between gay and straight upl: divisn of hoehold labor, sexual exclivy, and childrearg. In each, although recent data dite some signs of nvergg behavrs between the two typ of upl, major differenc appear likely to ntue. While the number of same-sex upl the populatn is too small to produce signifint change overall patterns of behavr, the issue of gay marriage has generated so much attentn and bate that a mixed procs of gay assiatn to and effect on the social meang of marriage is a reasonable expectatn. As to future legal change, the thor intifi three qutns likely to arise the relatively near future that will flow, directly or directly, om same-sex marriage: First, we may see an creasg uptake by different-sex upl of marriage equivalent and marriage alternative stat (e.g., domtic partnerships) that have grown out of LGBT rights efforts. If prent mographic trends ntue, the group of different-sex upl most likely to seek accs to the new stat will be persons middle-aged or olr. Send, feral regnn of same-sex marriage, which will occur if the Defense of Marriage Act is validated or repealed, uld signifintly crease the number of same-sex upl who marry. The end of DOMA is also likely to further plite the law of terstate regnn, as more gay upl have their marriag regnized for feral law purpos, such as tax, but not unr state laws that regulate divorce, ctody and property divisn. Sce 60 per cent of same-sex marriag are performed for out-of-state rints, the plexy of feral-state nflict regardg regnn of particular marriag is likely to crease dramatilly. Lastly, the thor qutns whether the issue of “accintal procreatn” that has
Contents:
- THE REAL IMPACT OF GAY MARRIAGE ON SOCIETY
- GAY MARRIAGE IS GOOD FOR AMERI
- GROWG SUPPORT FOR GAY MARRIAGE: CHANGED MDS AND CHANGG DEMOGRAPHICS
THE REAL IMPACT OF GAY MARRIAGE ON SOCIETY
If gay marriage were legalized, would really be the end of marriage as we know ? * the real impact of gay marriage on society *
WASHINGTON – Legalized gay marriage (search) may never e the transformatn of society that some have predicted, given that is likely to affect ls than one 100 U. ”Analysts e the 2000 Cens (search) to rive an official unt of the number of possible gay unns the Uned Stat -- 595, 000 hoeholds head by same-sex partners. 4 ln acrdg to the 2000 cens – analysts are torn over the impact legalized gay marriage will have on the way Amerins view the stutn and the way they look at Gallagher, -thor of “The Case for Marriage, ” recently ttified ont of the Senate that gay marriage activists are misreprentg the impact gay marriage will have.
”Gallagher claims that wh the legal onset of gay marriage, ernments will be the posn of forcg onto cizens a belief system that equat homosexualy wh heterosexualy — through public schools, taxpayer-fund programs like chari and non-profs, workplac and even fah-based anizatns (search) that receive public dollars.
GAY MARRIAGE IS GOOD FOR AMERI
Same-sex marriage is clearly a divisive issue the Uned Stat, wh passnate proponents on both sis. While most Amerins oppose legal regnn of same-sex marriag and the belief that they will harm society is relatively wispread, Amerins are personally divid on whether gay and lbian upl should have the same legal rights that married upl do. * the real impact of gay marriage on society *
“It will be a new legal and social norm and the law is gog to enforce this new social and legal norm on people, ” she far, Massachetts is the only state nsirg legal gay marriage.
The Legislature there is now batg whether to change s nstutn to ban such marriag but the licens are already beg distributed and a nstutnal amendment would not be ratified before the May date the urt set for allowg gay California and New York have fied their state laws and begun marryg gay upl. Constutn that would fe marriage as between a man and a woman and protect stat om havg to regnize gay upl married stat that allow gay is a bate over whether the issue will land the lap of the U.
Jonathan Rch, a wrer for the Natnal Journal (search) and thor of the upg “Gay Marriage: Why ’s Good for Gays, Good for Straights and Good for Ameri, ” said he don’t thk a nstutnal amendment is g, and believ that over the long-term, stat will expand marriage rights to homosexuals and the number of hold-outs will dwdle. “My personal view is gay marriage will have a signifintly posive effect on gay people, non-gay people and on marriage, ” he said.
GROWG SUPPORT FOR GAY MARRIAGE: CHANGED MDS AND CHANGG DEMOGRAPHICS
Get help on 【 The Real Impact Of Gay Marriage On Society 】 on Artslumbia ✅ Huge assortment of FREE says & assignments ✅ The bt wrers! * the real impact of gay marriage on society *
”Kurtz said he do not anticipate a future “patchwork” of state laws which some will be gay marriage-iendly while others will not regnize the unns. That is why the argument for gay marriage works — will enurage marriage and hold up as a “gold standard for stable relatnships. “What I thk is irratnal is the notn that [gay marriage] will surely fail and all the effects will be negative so we shouldn’t try at all.
* the real impact of gay marriage on society *
As recently as 2004, nearly twice as many Amerins opposed than favored allowg gay and lbian people to marry legally; by 2019, public opn had reversed, wh 61% favor and 31% opposed. Convergg l of evince also suggt that sexual orientatn stigma and discrimatn are at least associated wh creased psychologil distrs and a generally creased qualy of life among lbians and gay men. A US study that surveyed more than 36, 000 people aged 18-70 found lbian, gay and bisexual dividuals were far ls psychologilly distrsed if they were a legally regnised same-sex marriage than if they were not.
So, would seem that beg a legally regnised same-sex marriage n at least partly overe the substantial health dispary between heterosexual and lbian, gay, and bisexual persons. A review of the rearch examg the impact of marriage nial on the health and wellbeg of gay men and lbians nced that marriage equaly is a profoundly plex and nuanced issue.