Opponents of homosexualy sometim argue that if homosexual sex is morally permissible then so are btialy and necrophilia. A variant of this argument claims that if gay marriage should be permted then humans should be permted to marry non-human animals....
Contents:
WHAT ABOUT VLENT NECROPHILIAC GAY BTIALY?
Gay Beastialy is a group Send Life. Send Life is a ee 3D virtual world where ers n socialize, nnect and create g ee voice and text chat. * gay bestially *
Gay Beastialy.
There are books ( though rare and hard to fd and on I at this moment do not know the nam of only bee I uld re ls about readg them aga e I dont need to read them) that go to pth on animals who are more then willg to have sex wh other spiec and not only that but who also are more then willg to have gay sex.
GAY BEAST
* gay bestially *
We want that two gay men holdg hands and walkg down mare drive are not arrted. “Homosexualy and vegetative reproductn is only applible to lower class of animals, ” said lawyer Rajh Aggarwal, argug for one Rajarr Jaa, objectg to the -crimalisatn. #Sectn377 Sce the petners mentned that 5-8% of the populatn are homosexuals, therefore we reprent the majory of 95% of the populatn – argued by the rponnts.
The reason beg that the specific laws qutn aren’t really particularly material rtrictns on ee speech (as wh the 2006 Act, the current law on homophobia has an explic clse explag that merely cril or mockg speech is not cement to hatred), and that the UK really don’t need any of the antisocial behavur that is an evable nsequence of cements to hatred. One don’t have to be an aficnado of Mr Humphri or Larry Grayson to be aware that Brish edians have at least as much of a profsnal tert the mockery of gays as they do the mockery of religns, but if there was a big edians’ prott agast this one I missed . [2] In ments to that thread, my view of lls om the gay lobby for parallel protectn was somethg along the l of “tough luck”, bee I didn’t thk that vlent homophobia was enough of a social problem to warrant a rtrictn on ee speech.