Five years after the US Supreme Court clared a fundamental right for same-sex upl to marry, the jtic produced another landmark for the gay rights movement by lg that feral anti-bias law vers lns of gay, lbian and transgenr workers.
Contents:
- BRETT KAVANGH'S OPN ON GAY MARRIAGE IS BACKED BY A NOTOR ANTI-LGBTQ GROUP
- KAVANGH C LANDMARK GAY RIGHTS S ARGUMENT ABOUT ABORTN RTRICTNS
- BRETT KAVANGH'S ANSWER TO THIS QUTN ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE WILL GIVE YOU PSE
- WHAT EACH SUPREME COURT JTICE HAS SAID ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE
- LGBT ADVOT FEAR BRETT KAVANGH'S VOT ON GAY-RIGHTS ISSU
- WE NEED TO KNOW BRETT KAVANGH'S ROLE IN BH-ERA ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE AMENDMENT
BRETT KAVANGH'S OPN ON GAY MARRIAGE IS BACKED BY A NOTOR ANTI-LGBTQ GROUP
Judge Brett Kavangh would not reveal his personal views on gay marriage, repeatedly rebuffg the query om Sen. Cory Booker and referrg to Supreme Court precent. * brett kavanaugh gay marriage *
Tmp's choice has left many LGBTQ advot on edge, and 's no wonr: Brett Kavangh's opn on gay marriage is backed by an anti-LGBTQ group. The Fay Rearch Council is a vol opponent of gay rights and has lled homosexualy "disgtg" and "unnatural.
" Kavangh has not aligned himself wh the group's strong anti-LGBTQ stance, and 's unclear what he thks about gay rights. "Though Kavangh’s rerd on gay rights is a "relatively blank slate, " as The Daily Beast lled , LGBT activists still worry Kavangh uld rtrict or overturn the gay muny's nstutnal right to marriage. While Kavangh's thoughts on same-sex marriage and gay rights are not transparent, you n certaly tell where anti-LGBTQ activists stand.
KAVANGH C LANDMARK GAY RIGHTS S ARGUMENT ABOUT ABORTN RTRICTNS
However, cg two landmark gay rights s — Lawrence v. ”The lawyers who argued favor of gay rights the landmark LGBTQ s offered differg views on the validy of the argument by Kavangh, who was appoted 2018 by then-Print Donald Bonto, who argued on behalf of same-sex upl Obergefell v.
BRETT KAVANGH'S ANSWER TO THIS QUTN ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE WILL GIVE YOU PSE
’ The end, ” she advot largely agreed wh Bonto, sayg that the landmark gay rights cisns Obergefell v. Kavangh to the Supreme Court, gay Amerins have been among those most ncerned about the implitns of his past summer, the Human Rights Campaign lnched a “Stop Kavangh” vio hopg to enurage Amerins to exprs their disapproval of the judge.
WHAT EACH SUPREME COURT JTICE HAS SAID ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE
), one of the more liberal members of Congrs on gay rights issu, took up their baton on Thursday when she qutned Kavangh about his views on the urt se that extend marriage rights to gay Amerins, known as Obergefell v.
] Breyer and Jtice [Elena] Kagan, the days of discrimatg agast gay and lbian Amerins, or treatg gay and lbian Amerins as ferr digny and worth, are over.
”And other advot for gay rights shared her pot.
LGBT ADVOT FEAR BRETT KAVANGH'S VOT ON GAY-RIGHTS ISSU
In some ways, the 2016 printial electn pted whe evangelils and gay-rights activists agast one another, as both sis were hopg to have judg and jtic nomated that terpreted the law ways that protect the rights of their rpective many Amerins, the right to marry seems like settled law.
WE NEED TO KNOW BRETT KAVANGH'S ROLE IN BH-ERA ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE AMENDMENT
But to the gay muny, fears that the lg is anythg but cid are very real, nsirg the number of people who voted for Tmp wh the hope that he would appot judg who would overturn cisns popular wh more liberal Amerins. And many gay Amerins feared that judg would allow for further discrimatn agast gay people unr the guise of relig future is not clear for gay cizens’ abily to share the marriage rights that straight Amerins do. Kavangh’s non-answer likely reaffirmed the fears of gay Amerins and enuraged the nservative Christians who backed Tmp wh the hope that he would liver the urts to them.