A Colorado web signer who the U.S. Supreme Court led uld refe to make a weddg webse for gay upl had ced a requt om a man who says he never asked to work wh her.
Contents:
THE MAN NAMED THE SUPREME COURT’S GAY RIGHTS LG SAYS HE DIDN’T REQUT A WEDDG WEBSE
Christian webse signer says she received email requt om same-sex uple but ‘thor’ says he did not send – and is not gay * colorado gay website case *
AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTThe se may settle a qutn left open 2018: how to rencile claims of relig liberty wh laws barrg discrimatn based on sexual Kirkpatrick for The New York TimWASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed on Tuday to hear an appeal om a Colorado web signer who objects to providg servic for same-sex marriag, returng the jtic to a battleground the culture wars ptg claims of relig eedom agast laws prohibg discrimatn on the basis of sexual urt last nsired the clash 2018, when a siar dispute between a Colorado baker and a gay uple failed to yield a five precise qutn the jtic agreed to ci the new se is “whether applyg a public-acmodatn law to pel an artist to speak or stay silent vlat the ee speech clse of the First Amendment. It ncerns Lorie Smh, who owns a webse sign pany that says serv gay ctomers but tends to lim s weddg-related servic to celebratns of heterosexual unns. ”A Colorado law forbids discrimatn agast gay people by bs open to the public as well as statements announcg such discrimatn.
”Lower urts have generally sid wh gay and lbian upl who were refed service, lg that they are entled to equal treatment, at least parts of the untry wh laws forbiddg discrimatn based on sexual owners of bs challengg those laws have argued that the ernment should not force them to choose between the requirements of their fahs and their livelihoods, cg nstutnal protectns for ee speech and relig Smh’s lawyers had also asked the Supreme Court to ci whether the Colorado law vlated her right to the ee exercise of relign and to nsir whether to overle an important precent om 1990, Employment Divisn v. More about Adam LiptakA versn of this article appears prt on, Sectn A, Page 16 of the New York edn wh the headle: Jtic Will Revis Free Speech Qutns In Gay Marriage Case. " "My predictn is that we will not see a lot of the s" says Yale law profsor William Eskridge, who has wrten extensively about gay rights.
The veracy of a key document a major LGBTQ+ rights se before the US supreme urt has e unr qutn, raisg the possibily that important evince ced might be wrong or even supreme urt is expected to issue a lg on Friday 303 Creative LLC v Elenis, which als wh a challenge to a Colorado law prohibg public-servg bs om discrimatg agast gay people as well as any statements announcg such a su centers on Lorie Smh, a webse signer who do not want to provi her servic for gay weddgs bee of her relig 2016, she says, a gay man named Stewart requted her servic for help wh his upg weddg. Last year, lawyers for Colorado urged the jtic not to take the se bee Smh had not received a requt to make a webse for a gay uple.