'How uld he?': Former Jordan Peterson admirer reacts to his betrayal on 'gay parentg' - LifeSe

Contents:

• JORDAN PETERSON'S VIEWS ON GAY MARRIAGE AND CHILD-REARG ARE DUMB
• ‘A FAY LIKE OURS’: PORTRAS OF GAY FATHERHOOD
• ‘HOW ULD HE?’: FORMER JORDAN PETERSON ADMIRER REACTS TO HIS BETRAYAL ON ‘GAY PARENTG’
• JORDAN PETERSON’S ILLOGIL HOMOPHOBIA ON GAY PARENTG
• CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARD ADOPTS SOCIAL STUDI TEXTBOOKS THAT CLU GAY RIGHTS AFTER WARNGS OM ERNOR
• LBIAN AND GAY PARENTG

JORDAN PETERSON'S VIEWS ON GAY MARRIAGE AND CHILD-REARG ARE DUMB

Peterson ultimately offers his blsgs, but only unr the ndn that the gay uple "accept the fact that 's necsary for kids to have mols of both sex, " believe ep their hearts that "the sex are different" the first place, and realize they have a "tremendo rponsibily" to provi for their children "what is they would get the classil human un, " which he scrib as "father, mother, child.

Aga, Peterson's so obssed wh his weird ltle worldview that he se gay marriage not as a fight for equal treatment unr the law, not as a fight to claim next of k so you n be the hospal room when your partner is sick and dyg, not as a fight to be jt as miserable love as straight people marriag, but as one more tone a vast neo-Marxist nspiracy to ero "tradnal mos of beg.

‘A FAY LIKE OURS’: PORTRAS OF GAY FATHERHOOD

We’re tryg to sketch out a pathway … I mean, our culture appears to have cid that gay marriage has bee part of the stcture of marriage self, ” Peterson stated at the outset of the hour and a half discsn, wavg an enormo whe flag of surrenr.

Not only are Rub and his homosexual partner g surrogate mothers to bear two babi, th liberately privg the children of their te mothers' re once born, but he also admted those babi would have been aborted if found to have severe disabili. The Peterson/Rub discsn repeats the dynamic of last fall’s Nat Con 2 nference, where nservativ and GayCons found mon ground their abhorrence of transgenrism, pecially woke society’s mutilatn of the bodi and psych of vulnerable children and adolcents.

Keyword: parentg and fay, Majory report, sam ser, tyt work, the young turks, young turks, tyt, news, polics, socialism, socialist, femism, podst, our revolutn, progrsive news, Tmp 2016, Tmp amazg speech, Tmp Supporter, donald tmp, tmp, tmp news, donald tmp news, Jordan Peterson, gay marriage, lgbtq, gay parentg, jordan peterson d, jordan peterson bigot, IDW, tellectual dark web, jordan peterson homophobic. Peterson tak this domtitn myth one step further by suatg that society might be to blame for the excsive and flamboyant homosexual promiscuy, given the lack of stctur like “marriage” that past that uld channel the energi to more nstctive purpos.

‘HOW ULD HE?’: FORMER JORDAN PETERSON ADMIRER REACTS TO HIS BETRAYAL ON ‘GAY PARENTG’

“There is no discrimatn agast children, ” Fay Mister Eugenia Roccella told parliament when she troduced the bill June, explag that the children of gay upl would have accs to school and medil servic jt like those who only have one livg parent. The prev edn, which was tled Lbian and Gay Parentg: A Rource for Psychologists (1995) was the succsor to a publitn tled Lbian Parents and Their Children: A Rource Paper for Psychologists that was jotly produced by CLGBC and CWP 1991. Unlike heterosexual parents and their children, however, lbian and gay parents and their children are often subject to prejudice bee of their sexual orientatn that n turn judg, legislators, profsnals, and the public agast them, sometim rultg negative out, such as loss of physil ctody, rtrictns on visatn, and prohibns agast adoptn (ACLU Lbian and Gay Rights Project, 2002; Appell, 2003; Patterson, Fulcher, & Waright, 2002).

JORDAN PETERSON’S ILLOGIL HOMOPHOBIA ON GAY PARENTG

As wh beliefs about other socially stigmatized groups, the beliefs held generally society about lbians and gay men are often not based personal experience, but are equently culturally transmted (Herek, 1995; Gillis, 1998). Systematic rearch on the children of lbian and gay parents began to appear major profsnal journals the late 1970s and has grown to a nsirable body of rearch only recent years (Allen & Demo, 1995; Patterson, 1992, 2000).

As this summary will show, the rults of existg rearch parg lbian and gay parents to heterosexual parents and children of lbian and gay parents to children of heterosexual parents are que clear: Common stereotyp are not supported by the data. The relevance of this cricism has been greatly rced as rearch has expand to explore life a wir array of lbian mother and gay father fai (many of which have never lived through the divorce of a heterosexual uple), and as newer studi beg to clu a wir array of ntrol groups.

CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARD ADOPTS SOCIAL STUDI TEXTBOOKS THAT CLU GAY RIGHTS AFTER WARNGS OM ERNOR

Other cricisms have been that most studi have been based on relatively small sampl, that there have been difficulti wh asssment procr employed some studi, and that the classifitn of parents as lbian, gay, or heterosexual has been problematic. An expert readg of the Sarantakos article reveals that certa characteristics of s methodology and sample are highly likely to have skewed the rults and renred them an valid ditor of the well-beg of children raised by gay and lbian parents at least three rpects:. The children raised by gay and lbian parents experienced unually high levels of extreme social ostracism and overt hostily om other children and parents, which probably acunted for the former's lower levels of teractn and social tegratn wh peers (see pp.

Most or all of the children beg raised by gay and lbian parents, but not the children beg raised by heterosexual married parents, had experienced parental divorce, which is known to rrelate wh poor adjtment and amic performance. Some nonscientific anizatns have attempted to nvce urts that there is an actual scientific dispute this area by cg rearch performed by Pl Cameron as supportg the existence of fics gay and lbian parents or their children pared to heterosexual parents or their children. Three ncerns have historilly been associated wh judicial cisn makg ctody ligatn and public polici erng foster re and adoptn: the belief that lbians and gay men are mentally ill, that lbians are ls maternal than heterosexual women, and that lbians' and gay men's relatnships wh sexual partners leave ltle time for ongog parent-child teractns (ACLU Lbian and Gay Rights Project, 2002; Falk, 1989, 1994; Patterson et al., 2002; Patterson & Reddg, 1996).

LBIAN AND GAY PARENTG

Many years ago, the Amerin Psychiatric Associatn removed "homosexualy" om s list of mental disorrs, statg that "homosexualy per se impli no impairment judgment, stabily, reliabily, or general social or votnal pabili" (Amerin Psychiatric Associatn, 1974). In 1975, the Amerin Psychologil Associatn took the same posn and urged all mental health profsnals to help dispel the stigma of mental illns that had long been associated wh homosexual orientatn (Amerin Psychologil Associatn, 1975). The cisn to remove homosexual orientatn om the list of mental disorrs reflects extensive rearch nducted over three s showg that homosexual orientatn is not a psychologil maladjtment (Gonsrek, 1991; Hart, Roback, Ttler, Wez, Walston, & McKee, 1978; Reiss, 1980).

There is no reliable evince that homosexual orientatn per se impairs psychologil functng, although the social and other circumstanc which lbians and gay men live, cludg exposure to wispread prejudice and discrimatn, often e acute distrs (Cochran, 2001; Freedman, 1971; Gonsrek, 1991; Hart et al., 1978; Hooker, 1957; Meyer, 2003; Reiss, 1980).

Beliefs that lbian and gay adults are not f parents likewise have no empiril foundatn (Anrssen, Amlie, & Ytteroy, 2002; Brewaeys & van Hall, 1997; Parks, 1998; Patterson, 2000; Patterson & Chan, 1996; Perr, 2002; Stacey & Biblarz, 2001; Tasker, 1999; Victor & Fish, 1995). A recent study of 256 lbian and gay parent fai found that, ntrast to patterns characterizg the majory of Amerin parents, very few lbian and gay parents reported any e of physil punishment (such as spankg) as a disciplary technique; stead, they were likely to report e of posive techniqu such as reasong (Johnson & O'Connor, 2002).

Certaly, rearch has found no reasons to believe lbian mothers or gay fathers to be unf parents (Armto, 2002; Barret & Robson, 1990; Bigner & Bozett, 1990; Bigner & Jabsen, 1989a, 1989b; Bos et al., 2003, 2004; Bozett, 1980, 1989; Patterson, 1997; Patterson & Chan, 1996; Sbordone, 1993; Tasker & Golombok, 1997; Victor & Fish, 1995; Wton, 1991). For stance, one such ncern is that children brought up by lbian mothers or gay fathers will show disturbanc genr inty and/or genr role behavr (Falk, 1989, 1994; Hchens & Kirkpatrick, 1985; Kleber, Howell, & Tibbs-Kleber, 1986; Patterson et al., 2002; Patterson & Reddg, 1996). For example, urts have exprsed fears that children the ctody of gay or lbian parents will be more vulnerable to mental breakdown, will exhib more adjtment difficulti and behavr problems, and will be ls psychologilly healthy than other children.