Appeals Judg Raise Doubts on Gay Marriage Ban | The Texas Tribune

Contents:

• SIX TEXAS LAWSUS TARGET GAY MARRIAGE, LGBT RIGHTS AFTER THE FALL OF ROE V. WAJONATHAN MCHELL, THE LAWYER WHO HELPED WRE THE ABORTN BOUNTY LAW, IS BEHD SEVERAL S THAT ULD ADVERSELY AFFECT LGBT RIGHTS. THE CY OF DALLAS' PRI FLAG (RIGHT) FLI ALONGSI THE TEXAS AND U.S. FLAGS OUTSI OF CY HALL DOWNTOWN DALLAS, THURSDAY, JUNE 18, 2020 HONOR OF PRI MONTH. TEXAS IS POISED TO BEE A BATTLEGROUND FOR LGBT RIGHTS, AS NO FEWER THAN A HALF DOZEN LAWSUS ON THE ISSUE HAVE BEEN FILED BY THE STATE'S FORMER SOLICOR GENERAL OVER THE ISSUE RECENT YEARS. (TOM FOX/THE DALLAS MORNG NEWS)(TOM FOX / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)BY LREN MCGGHY7:00 AM ON JUL 21, 2022 CDTAUSTIN — IN THE WAKE OF THE TOPPLG OF ROE VS. WA AND WH JTICE CLARENCE THOMAS URGG THE U.S. SUPREME COURT TO REVIS LGS ON GAY SEX AND MARRIAGE, TEXAS IS THE STAGE FOR SEVERAL LAWSUS ALG WH LGBT RIGHTS.RIGHT NOW, A HALF DOZEN S ON EVERYTHG OM SURANCE VERAGE FOR HIV PREVENTN TO EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMATN AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ARE WENDG THEIR WAY THROUGH STATE AND FERAL URTS HERE. THEIR OUT ULD RADILLY ALTER RIGHTS FOR LBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENR PEOPLE TEXAS AND ACROSS THE UNTRY.ADVERTISEMENTTHE LAWSUS ALL HAVE ONE THG MON: FORMER TEXAS SOLICOR GENERAL JONATHAN MCHELL.ADVERTISEMENTBT KNOWN AS THE MAN BEHD THE STATE LAW THAT ALLOWS TEXANS TO FILE CIVIL LAWSUS AGAST PEOPLE WHO HELP PREGNANT PEOPLE GET ABORTNS, MCHELL OPENED UP A LAW FIRM AT FOUR YEARS AGO WH THE GOAL OF SYSTEMATILLY DISMANTLG S OF URT LGS HE BELIEV PART OM THE U.S. CONSTUTN.BREAKG NEWSGET THE LATT BREAKG NEWS OM NORTH TEXAS AND BEYOND.EMAIL ADDRSBY SIGNG UP YOU AGREE TO OUR TERMS OF SERVICE AND PRIVACY POLICYSUBMITTHE DALLAS MORNG NEWS IS TRACKG SIX OF HIS S THAT ORIGATED TEXAS AND AL WH LGBT RIGHTS. HERE’S A SUMMARY OF EACH SE.RELATED:AFTER ROE, ARCHECT OF TEXAS ABORTN LAW SETS SIGHTS ON GAY MARRIAGE AND MOREADVERTISEMENTGAY MARRIAGEDIANNE HENSLEY VS. STATE COMMISSN ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT (THIRD COURT OF APPEALS)BRIAN KEH UMPHRS VS. DAVID HALL, ET AL. (NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS)ADVERTISEMENTSUMMARY: BOTH OF THE S WERE BROUGHT BY TEXAS OFFICIALS WH THE THORY TO PERFORM WEDDGS BUT WHO DO NOT WANT TO OFFER MARRIAG TO SAME-SEX UPL BEE THEY SAY VLAT THEIR RELIG BELIEFS.ADVERTISEMENTONE SE STATE URT, FILED BY MCLENNAN COUNTY JTICE OF THE PEACE DIANNE HENSELY, ARGU THAT MARRIAGE OFFICIANTS WHO ARE ERNMENT OFFICIALS SHOULD BE ABLE TO RECE THEMSELV OM PERFORMG CEREMONI FOR GAY UPL IF THE UPL HAVE A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE OPTN TO BE WED. THE OTHER SE, FERAL URT AND FILED BY JACK COUNTY JUDGE BRIAN KEH UMPHRS, MAK A SIAR ARGUMENT.BUT THE UMPHRS SE GO FURTHER, ARGUG THAT THE U.S. SUPREME COURT ERRED WHEN CLARED GAY MARRIAGE BANS UNNSTUTNAL 2015. IT URG THE URT TO REVIS THAT CISN.“THERE IS NO NSTUTNAL RIGHT TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE,” THE UMPHRS SE READS. “THE FERAL JUDICIARY HAS NO THORY TO REGNIZE OR VENT ‘FUNDAMENTAL’ NSTUTNAL RIGHTS.”ADVERTISEMENTUMPHRS’ SE IS AWAG A CISN OM THE FERAL APPEALS URT. HENSLEY’S SE IS BEFORE A STATE APPEALS URT AT.OTHER ACTORS: CHAD AND DTY FILLMORE OF FORT WORTH ARE ALSO LISTED AS LAWYERS FOR UMPHRS, AS ARE LAWYERS OM THE PLANO-BASED CHRISTIAN NONPROF LAW FIRM FIRST LIBERTY INSTUTE AND JACKSBORO-BASED FIRM SPILLER & SPILLER.POTENTIAL EFFECTS: IF MCHELL WS EHER SE, ERNMENTAL OFFICIALS WHO ARE MARRIAGE OFFICIANTS WOULD BE ABLE TO WED ONLY OPPOSE-SEX UPL. IF THE UMPHRS SE PROCEEDS, THE QUTN OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ULD AGA END UP BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT. IN HIS NCURRG OPN THE CISN OVERTURNG ROE LAST MONTH, CLARENCE THOMAS URGED HIS FELLOW JTIC TO TAKE UP THE ISSUE IF A SE QUTNG THE NSTUTNAL RIGHT TO GAY MARRIAGE PRENTS SELF.RELATED:IF ROE V. WA FALLS, ARE LGBT RIGHTS NEXT? ADVERTISEMENTINSURANCE MANDAT
• TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE FERS TO U.S. SUPREME COURT ON GAY MARRIAGE QUTN
• FIFTEEN YEARS AFTER LANDMARK GAY RIGHTS SE, SAME-SEX UPL TEXAS STILL FACE CHALLENG URT
• TEXAS JUDGE FIGHTS TO NY WEDDG CEREMONI TO GAY UPL
• GAY MARRIAGE ARRIV TEXAS
• WHAT THE HISTORY OF GAY MARRIAGE LEGISLATN TEXAS CAN TEACH US ABOUT ITS FUTURE
• JUDGE US SUPREME COURT’S GAY WEDDG WEBSE RULG FOR HER OWN ANTI-LGBTQ LAWSU
• AFTER ROE, ARCHECT OF TEXAS ABORTN LAW SETS SIGHTS ON GAY MARRIAGE AND MOREJONATHAN MCHELL, THE FORMER SOLICOR GENERAL WHO HELPED WRE SENATE BILL 8, HAS OPENED A PRIVATE LAW FIRM TEXAS TO GO AFTER S OF HIGH-URT LGS.JONATHAN MCHELL, SHOWN A URTHOE SKETCH ARGUG BEFORE THE U.S. SUPREME COURT NOVEMBER 2021, IS THE FORMER SOLICOR GENERAL OF TEXAS. HE HAS OPENED UP A PRIVATE PRACTICE AT WH THE GOAL OF DISMANTLG URT LGS HE BELIEV WERE WRONGLY CID.(ART LIEN / ART LIEN)BY LREN MCGGHY5:01 AM ON JUL 3, 2022 CDTIF JONATHAN MCHELL WERE A IC BOOK CHARACTER, HE WOULD BE DRAWN HOLDG A LAWBOOK ONE HAND AND THE OTHER, A SLEDGEHAMMER.BT KNOWN AS THE ARCHECT BEHD SENATE BILL 8, THE STATE LAW THAT PUTIZ EVERYDAY TEXANS AS ABORTN BOUNTY HUNTERS, MCHELL HAS SPENT YEARS ARGUG THAT THE U.S. SUPREME COURT SHOULD REVERSE S CISN ROE VS. WA. HIS LEGAL THEORI AND URT S HELPED LAY THE GROUNDWORK ONTO WHICH THE LG ME TOPPLG DOWN.ADVERTISEMENTBUT AS THE RT OF THE UNTRY WAS BRACG FOR THE FALL OF ROE, MCHELL WAS ALREADY MOVG ON. SCE OPENG UP A ONE-MAN LEGAL SHOP AT FOUR YEARS AGO, HE HAS JUMPED HEADLONG TO MYRIAD OTHER LAWSUS OVER EVERYTHG OM THE NTRACEPTIVE MANDATE TO AFFIRMATIVE ACTN AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE.ADVERTISEMENTMCHELL SAYS HIS GOAL IS TO SYSTEMATILLY DISMANTLE S OF LGS HE BELIEV PART OM THE LANGUAGE OF THE U.S. CONSTUTN OR THAT IMPOSE NSTUTNAL RIGHTS WH NO TEXTUAL BASIS. WH THE SUPREME COURT MOVG EVER MORE HIS WAY, THE S HE BRGS MAY BE A BELLWETHER FOR THE DIRECTN OF THE NATN’S LEGAL TABLISHMENT, AND, BY EXTENSN, THE NATN SELF.BREAKG NEWSGET THE LATT BREAKG NEWS OM NORTH TEXAS AND BEYOND.EMAIL ADDRSBY SIGNG UP YOU AGREE TO OUR TERMS OF SERVICE AND PRIVACY POLICYSUBMITIN A RARE TERVIEW, THE FORMER SOLICOR GENERAL OF TEXAS SISTED THAT UNRLYG HIS MISSN IS NOT RELIG BELIEF OR POLIL IOLOGY OR PERSONAL ANIM, BUT AN UNFLCHG NVICTN THAT FERAL URTS MT TERPRET THE CONSTUTN CLOSELY AND NNOT CLARE NEW RIGHTS NOT EXPLICLY AFFORD THAT DOCUMENT.MCHELL SE HIMSELF THE ROLE OF REEMER — NOT STROYER.ADVERTISEMENT“FOR S, THE SUPREME COURT HAS BEEN MAKG UP NSTUTNAL RIGHTS THAT ARE NOWHERE TO BE FOUND THE LANGUAGE OF THE DOCUMENT,” MCHELL, 45, TOLD THE DALLAS MORNG NEWS. “THE CISNS ARE LAWLS, AND THEY NEED TO BE UNRMED AND RISTED AT EVERY TURN UNTIL THE SUPREME COURT SE F TO OVERLE THEM.”BUT WHERE MCHELL SE HIMSELF AS A VOTEE TO THE LE OF LAW, HIS OPPONENTS TECT AN EXTREMIST. REGARD EVEN BY HIS HARSHT CRICS AS AN UNNIABLY SHARP LEGAL MD, THEY FLT HIM FOR, THEIR VIEWS, TENTNALLY DISMISSG PRECENT AND THE REAL-WORLD NSEQUENC OF HIS ACTNS AN EFFORT TO WIPE A NUMBER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OM THE LAWBOOKS.A SHIFT TO TEXTUALISMWHEN MCHELL THREW HIS SUPPORT BEHD MISSISSIPPI’S 15-WEEK ABORTN BAN, THE SE THAT TOPPLED ROE, HE URGED THE SUPREME COURT NOT TO BE SQUEAMISH ABOUT OTHER LGS MIGHT KNOCK DOWN.ADVERTISEMENTINTERRACIAL MARRIAGE IS PROTECTED UNR FERAL CIVIL RIGHTS LAW EVEN THOUGH ’S NOT SPECIFILLY PRERVED THE CONSTUTN, MCHELL WROTE AN AMIC BRIEF THORED BY CHIGO LAW SCHOOL CHUM ADAM MORTARA. THE SAME ULD NOT BE SAID FOR “THE URT-VENTED RIGHTS TO HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE,” THEY ARGUED.ADVERTISEMENTOBERGEFELL VS. HODG AND LAWRENCE VS. TEXAS, THE LGS THAT CLARED BANS ON GAY MARRIAGE AND GAY SEX AS UNNSTUTNAL, WERE “AS LAWLS” AS THE ABORTN LGS, THEY WROTE. IF ROE WERE TO BE OVERTURNED, MCHELL AND MORTARA ARGUED, THE URT SHOULD NOT HATE TO CLARE THAT THE OTHER LGS ARE LIKEWISE “HANGG BY A THREAD.”LAST MONTH, CLARENCE THOMAS SAID JT THAT.IN A NCURRG OPN SUPPORTG THE CISN TO OVERTURN ROE, THE NSERVATIVE JTICE LLED LAWRENCE AND OBERGEFELL “MONSTRABLY ERRONEO CISNS” WH NO BASIS THE CONSTUTN OR U.S. HISTORY. HE URGED HIS FELLOW JTIC TO “RENSIR” THEM.ADVERTISEMENTRELATED:IN ABORTN OPN, THOMAS URG SUPREME COURT TO ‘RENSIR’ GAY RIGHTS LGS THE JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY UNRLYG THE CISN TO OVERTURN ROE IS LLED TEXTUALISM, A THEORY OF TERPRETATN THAT EMPHASIZ A PLA READG OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS BASED ON THEIR TEXT. MCHELL IS A STRONG ADHERENT.“IF A NSTUTNAL RIGHT IS NOT MENTNED THE NSTUTNAL TEXT, DON’T EXIST,” MCHELL SAID A WI-REACHG TERVIEW. “I DON’T RE HOW SIRABLE MAY SEEM AS A MATTER OF POLICY.”HIS RE BELIEF TEXTUALISM IS UNRSRED BY A NCEPT MCHELL ED HIMSELF LLED THE “WR OF ERASURE FALLACY.” COURTS, EVEN THE HIGHT THE LAND, N ONLY STOP CERTA LAWS OM BEG ENFORCED BY CERTA FENDANTS, HIS NCEPT DICTAT; THEY DO NOT HAVE THE POWER TO “ALTER OR ANNUL” THEM.ADVERTISEMENTTHIS MEANS MCHELL VIEWS NEARLY EVERY SUPREME COURT LG AS STRICTLY TEMPORAL — CISNS THAT N BE REVERSED IF THE RIGHT ARGUMENT IS MA ONT OF THE RIGHT SET OF JTIC. AND BY EXTENSN, ANY LAW THAT REMAS ON THE BOOKS, EVEN IF IS EMED UNNSTUTNAL BY THE HIGH URT, N BE REVIVED IF THE URT CHANG S MD.FOR EXAMPLE, TEXAS LEGISLATORS HAVE REFED TO REMOVE THE STATE’S BANS ON SAME-SEX TIMATE RELATNS AND GAY MARRIAGE AND OM THE LAWBOOKS EVEN THOUGH THEY’RE UNENFORCEABLE. AND LAST WEEK, ATTORNEY GENERAL KEN PAXTON ARGUED THAT ABORTNS SHOULD BE ILLEGAL TEXAS IMMEDIATELY BEE THE STATE NEVER REPEALED AN ABORTN BAN ENACTED 1925.JT SIX YEARS AGO, AT THE TIME OF ANTON SLIA’S ATH, THE MAJORY OF SUPREME COURT JTIC ADHERED TO AN TERPRETATN OF THE CONSTUTN THAT LOOKED AT AS A LIVG DOCUMENT AND RELIED MORE ON PRECENT. BUT THE URT HAS SHIFTED AND BEE MORE RECEPTIVE TO TEXTUALIST ARGUMENTS — EVEN LIBERAL JTICE ELENA KAGAN RECENTLY CLARED, “WE’RE ALL TEXTUALISTS NOW.”THIS SHIFT IS ONE BIG REASON MCHELL OPENED UP SHOP TEXAS. THIS IS THE MOMENT, HE BELIEV, TO PURSUE HIS GOAL OF TARGETG CISNS HE NSIRS BASED ON IMPROPER TERPRETATNS OF THE CONSTUTN. AND WH HIS EXPERIENCE THE STATE AND S FAVORABLE TAX LAWS, AT IS THE PLACE TO DO .ADVERTISEMENTTHE ROAD TO TEXASRAISED PENNSYLVANIA, MCHELL ATTEND WHEATON COLLEGE, WHICH BILLS SELF AS PREPARG STUNTS TO “MAKE AN IMPACT FOR CHRIST.” HE WENT ON TO STUDY LAW AT THE UNIVERSY OF CHIGO, WHERE HE GRADUATED WH HIGH HONORS.MORTARA, HIS LAW SCHOOL CLASSMATE, SCRIB HIS LONGTIME IEND AS “EPLY THOUGHTFUL” AND “MORAL,” A MAN LACKG EVEN ONE “UNKD CELL HIS BODY.” HE SISTS MCHELL HAS BEEN HORRIBLY MISCHARACTERIZED AS SOME KD OF A “WTBORO BAPTIST GUY” FIXATED ON TAKG AWAY PEOPLE’S RIGHTS.“HE IS VERY GENTLE,” MORTARA SAID. “HE IS EXTREMELY POLE AND RPECTFUL TO PEOPLE OF ALL BACKGROUNDS.”ADVERTISEMENTAT WHEATON, MCHELL MAJORED PUTER SCIENCE, AND IENDS SAY HE APPROACH LAW WH THE SAME LIBERATE FOC ONE MIGHT WHEN TKERG WH A MACHE. THEY THROW AROUND WORDS LIKE “GENI” AND “VISNARY” AND “NERD.” HE IS PUNCTIL, THEY SAY, UNPROMISG WHEN TO L AND NDUCT, AND WH A HEIGHTENED NCERN FOR MORALY AND S OF NDUCT.BY WAY OF EXAMPLE, ONE IEND OFFERED UP THE WAY MCHELL BILLS HIS HOURS. MOST LAWYERS SPL THEIR TIME ON THE CLOCK TO CREMENTS OF SIX MUT. MCHELL BREAKS HIS DOWN EVEN FURTHER TO ENSURE HE’S NOT OVERCHARGG CLIENTS.“HE’S A HAPPY WARRR,” SAID HIRAM SASSER, A LONGTIME IEND OF MCHELL’S AND EXECUTIVE GENERAL UNSEL OF THE NSERVATIVE LEGAL NONPROF FIRST LIBERTY INSTUTE. “HE’S A FORMIDABLE ALLY.”AFTER LAW SCHOOL, MCHELL CLERKED FOR J. MICHAEL LUTTIG AND SLIA. HE WAS THERE WHEN THE JTICE WROTE ONE OF HIS MOST MEMORABLE DISSENTS TO THE 2003 LAWRENCE LG CLARG TEXAS’ BAN ON GAY SEX UNNSTUTNAL.ADVERTISEMENTFROM 2010 TO 2015, MCHELL SERVED AS TEXAS’ CHIEF APPELLATE LAWYER UNR THEN-ATTORNEY GENERAL GREG ABBOTT. HE ARGUED ONT OF THE SUPREME COURT FOUR TIM AND FEND THE STATE’S LAWS AGAST SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND ABORTN. A MEMBER OF THE NSERVATIVE LEGAL ANIZATN THE FERALIST SOCIETY, HE LATER TGHT LAW AT STANFORD AND THE UNIVERSY OF TEXAS AT AT.THEN-PRINT DONALD TMP NOMATED MCHELL TO HEAD THE ADMISTRATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE UNED STAT, AN AGENCY MEANT TO IMPROVE FERAL LEMAKG AND OTHER PROCS, BUT HE WAS NOT NFIRMED.IN 2018, AS TMP APPOTED HIS SEND OF THREE JTIC TO THE HIGH URT, MCHELL OPENED HIS OWN FIRM AT. IT’S THE FIRST TIME HE’S BEEN PRIVATE PRACTICE.MCHELL HAS THROWN HIMSELF HEADLONG TO THE ABORTN FIGHT TEXAS. HE HELPED DRAFT CY ORDANC THAT SOUGHT TO OUTLAW ABORTN AT THE LOL LEVEL AND HAD A HAND CRAFTG SENATE BILL 8, WHICH EMPOWERS PRIVATE CIZENS TO SUE ANYONE WHO “AIDS OR ABETS” AN ABORTN FOR UP TO $10,000.ADVERTISEMENTTHE BILL, WHICH SENTIALLY BANS ABORTN AFTER ABOUT SIX WEEKS, BEME LAW SEPTEMBER. IT WAS TTED BY THE SUPREME COURT AND ALLOWED TO STAY PLACE.SENATE BILL 8 IS NOW NSIRED MOL LEGISLATN BY OTHER RED STAT THAT MAY E TO PUTIZE THEIR CIZENS TO ENFORCE OTHER NSERVATIVE LAWS. MCHELL’S ROLE CRAFTG THE LEGISLATN TAPULTED HIM TO THE NATNAL SPOTLIGHT.BUT MCHELL HARDLY EVER SPEAKS TO THE MEDIA. HE DON’T APPEAR TO HAVE ANY SOCIAL MEDIA PRENCE. THERE ARE ONLY A HANDFUL OF PHOTOS OF HIM ONLE AND HE WOULD NOT NSENT TO A PORTRA FOR THIS STORY. EVEN WHEN SENATE BILL 8 WAS PASSED TO LAW, HE WASN’T AT THE PUBLIC SIGNG CEREMONY.MCHELL, MARRIED WH CHILDREN, SAYS HE DO NOT HAVE TIME FOR HOBBI AND SE NO NEED TO SEEK THE LIMELIGHT. HIS FIRM DON’T ISSUE NEWS RELEAS WHEN FIL NEW S OR MARKS A W.ADVERTISEMENTTHE PAYOFF THE VICTORY SELF.GAY MARRIAGE SWHILE MCHELL VALU HIS PRIVACY, HIS WORK NOW APPEARS TO BE EVERYWHERE.HE HAS HIS HANDS S OM CALIFORNIA TO NEW YORK VOLVG SUCH DISPARATE NCEPTS AS REDISTRICTG, SUBSIDI FOR BLACK FARMERS AND RELIG LIBERTY. WHILE THERE ARE A HANDFUL OF NSERVATIVE NONPROF LAW FIRMS PURSUG SIAR S, WH WHOM MCHELL AT TIM WORKS TANM, HE SE HIMSELF AS STEPPG TO A VOID WHERE OTHER PRIVATE ATTORNEYS RARELY DARE TO VENTURE.ADVERTISEMENT“THE BIG LAW FIRMS WON’T TOUCH THIS STUFF. SO SOMETIM FEELS AS THOUGH I HAVE THE FIELD TO MYSELF,” MCHELL SAID.AT LEAST TWO OF THE ROUGHLY 50 S HE IS PURSUG VOLVE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE.IN BOTH, MCHELL ARGU THAT ERNMENT EMPLOYE WH THE POWER TO PERFORM MARRIAG TEXAS SHOULD BE ABLE TO RECE THEMSELV OM PERFORMG GAY WEDDGS DUE TO RELIG BELIEFS. ONE OF THE S, WHICH IS AWAG A CISN OM THE FIFTH CIRCU COURT OF APPEALS, PROVIS A PREVIEW OF HOW MCHELL WOULD ARGUE FOR THE REVERSAL OF OBERGEFELL.IN A BRIEF FILED JUNE 2020, MCHELL ARGUED THAT OBERGEFELL IMPROPERLY “SUBORDAT” STATE LAW TO “THE POLICY PREFERENC OF UNELECTED JUDG.”ADVERTISEMENT“THERE IS NO NSTUTNAL RIGHT TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE,” MCHELL ARGUED ON BEHALF OF HIS CLIENT, A UNTY JUDGE WHO ARGU THAT HIS CHRISTIAN FAH PROHIBS HIM OM MARRYG GAY UPL. MCHELL ADD: “THE FERAL JUDICIARY HAS NO THORY TO REGNIZE OR VENT ‘FUNDAMENTAL’ NSTUTNAL RIGHTS.”RELATED:IF ROE V. WA FALLS, ARE LGBT RIGHTS NEXT? THAT’S WHY THEIR AMIC THE ABORTN SE THAT OVERTURNED ROE WAS PURPOSEFULLY PROVOTIVE — PART TO MAKE MISSISSIPPI’S ARGUMENTS APPEAR MORE MORATE PARISON AND TO GIVE THE HIGH URT THE FORTU TO CLARE THAT THE RIGHTS HAD NO BASIS THE CONSTUTN.“WE WANTED TO SHOW THE JTIC THAT THE ENTIRE EDIFICE OF URT-VENTED RIGHTS SHOULD BE REJECTED, BEE MANY OF THOSE RIGHTS [SUCH AS THE RIGHTS TO NTRACEPTN AND TERRACIAL MARRIAGE] ARE PROTECTED BY OTHER SOURC OF FERAL LAW, SO THERE IS NOTHG TO FEAR OM REPUDIATG THE SUPPOSED NSTUTNAL BASIS FOR THOSE RIGHTS,” HE SAID.ADVERTISEMENTDPE THE S, MCHELL SAID HE IS NOT TRYG TO “DISMANTLE” GAY MARRIAGE.IF STATE LEGISLATUR WANT TO PASS LAWS LEGALIZG , THEY N, HE SAID. BUT UNTIL THE CONSTUTN IS AMEND TO CLU THE RIGHT TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, HE ARGU THAT THE SUPREME COURT WRONGLY CID THIS ISSUE AND THE LG IS PLAY.WHEN ASKED ABOUT HIS PERSONAL VIEWS ON THE MATTER, MCHELL SAID HE NSIRS THE POLICY TO BE “A MUCH CLOSER QUTN” THAN WHETHER SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS A NSTUTNAL RIGHT.“I’M A FORMALIST AND LEGALIST BY ORIENTATN,” HE SAID. “POLICY CISNS ARE FOR THE POLIL BRANCH TO SORT OUT.”ADVERTISEMENTOPPONENTS SAY
• JTICE ALO TAK AIM AT GAY MARRIAGE 'POLILLY CHARGED SPEECH'
• TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL KEN PAXTON WON'T FEND STATE AGENCY GAY MARRIAGE SE
• APPEALS JUDG RAISE DOUBTS ON GAY MARRIAGE BAN
• AFTER ROE, ARCHECT OF TEXAS ABORTN LAW SETS SIGHTS ON GAY MARRIAGE

SIX TEXAS LAWSUS TARGET GAY MARRIAGE, LGBT RIGHTS AFTER THE FALL OF ROE V. WAJONATHAN MCHELL, THE LAWYER WHO HELPED WRE THE ABORTN BOUNTY LAW, IS BEHD SEVERAL S THAT ULD ADVERSELY AFFECT LGBT RIGHTS. THE CY OF DALLAS' PRI FLAG (RIGHT) FLI ALONGSI THE TEXAS AND U.S. FLAGS OUTSI OF CY HALL DOWNTOWN DALLAS, THURSDAY, JUNE 18, 2020 HONOR OF PRI MONTH. TEXAS IS POISED TO BEE A BATTLEGROUND FOR LGBT RIGHTS, AS NO FEWER THAN A HALF DOZEN LAWSUS ON THE ISSUE HAVE BEEN FILED BY THE STATE'S FORMER SOLICOR GENERAL OVER THE ISSUE RECENT YEARS. (TOM FOX/THE DALLAS MORNG NEWS)(TOM FOX / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)BY LREN MCGGHY7:00 AM ON JUL 21, 2022 CDTAUSTIN — IN THE WAKE OF THE TOPPLG OF ROE VS. WA AND WH JTICE CLARENCE THOMAS URGG THE U.S. SUPREME COURT TO REVIS LGS ON GAY SEX AND MARRIAGE, TEXAS IS THE STAGE FOR SEVERAL LAWSUS ALG WH LGBT RIGHTS.RIGHT NOW, A HALF DOZEN S ON EVERYTHG OM SURANCE VERAGE FOR HIV PREVENTN TO EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMATN AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ARE WENDG THEIR WAY THROUGH STATE AND FERAL URTS HERE. THEIR OUT ULD RADILLY ALTER RIGHTS FOR LBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENR PEOPLE TEXAS AND ACROSS THE UNTRY.ADVERTISEMENTTHE LAWSUS ALL HAVE ONE THG MON: FORMER TEXAS SOLICOR GENERAL JONATHAN MCHELL.ADVERTISEMENTBT KNOWN AS THE MAN BEHD THE STATE LAW THAT ALLOWS TEXANS TO FILE CIVIL LAWSUS AGAST PEOPLE WHO HELP PREGNANT PEOPLE GET ABORTNS, MCHELL OPENED UP A LAW FIRM AT FOUR YEARS AGO WH THE GOAL OF SYSTEMATILLY DISMANTLG S OF URT LGS HE BELIEV PART OM THE U.S. CONSTUTN.BREAKG NEWSGET THE LATT BREAKG NEWS OM NORTH TEXAS AND BEYOND.EMAIL ADDRSBY SIGNG UP YOU AGREE TO OUR TERMS OF SERVICE AND PRIVACY POLICYSUBMITTHE DALLAS MORNG NEWS IS TRACKG SIX OF HIS S THAT ORIGATED TEXAS AND AL WH LGBT RIGHTS. HERE’S A SUMMARY OF EACH SE.RELATED:AFTER ROE, ARCHECT OF TEXAS ABORTN LAW SETS SIGHTS ON GAY MARRIAGE AND MOREADVERTISEMENTGAY MARRIAGEDIANNE HENSLEY VS. STATE COMMISSN ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT (THIRD COURT OF APPEALS)BRIAN KEH UMPHRS VS. DAVID HALL, ET AL. (NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS)ADVERTISEMENTSUMMARY: BOTH OF THE S WERE BROUGHT BY TEXAS OFFICIALS WH THE THORY TO PERFORM WEDDGS BUT WHO DO NOT WANT TO OFFER MARRIAG TO SAME-SEX UPL BEE THEY SAY VLAT THEIR RELIG BELIEFS.ADVERTISEMENTONE SE STATE URT, FILED BY MCLENNAN COUNTY JTICE OF THE PEACE DIANNE HENSELY, ARGU THAT MARRIAGE OFFICIANTS WHO ARE ERNMENT OFFICIALS SHOULD BE ABLE TO RECE THEMSELV OM PERFORMG CEREMONI FOR GAY UPL IF THE UPL HAVE A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE OPTN TO BE WED. THE OTHER SE, FERAL URT AND FILED BY JACK COUNTY JUDGE BRIAN KEH UMPHRS, MAK A SIAR ARGUMENT.BUT THE UMPHRS SE GO FURTHER, ARGUG THAT THE U.S. SUPREME COURT ERRED WHEN CLARED GAY MARRIAGE BANS UNNSTUTNAL 2015. IT URG THE URT TO REVIS THAT CISN.“THERE IS NO NSTUTNAL RIGHT TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE,” THE UMPHRS SE READS. “THE FERAL JUDICIARY HAS NO THORY TO REGNIZE OR VENT ‘FUNDAMENTAL’ NSTUTNAL RIGHTS.”ADVERTISEMENTUMPHRS’ SE IS AWAG A CISN OM THE FERAL APPEALS URT. HENSLEY’S SE IS BEFORE A STATE APPEALS URT AT.OTHER ACTORS: CHAD AND DTY FILLMORE OF FORT WORTH ARE ALSO LISTED AS LAWYERS FOR UMPHRS, AS ARE LAWYERS OM THE PLANO-BASED CHRISTIAN NONPROF LAW FIRM FIRST LIBERTY INSTUTE AND JACKSBORO-BASED FIRM SPILLER & SPILLER.POTENTIAL EFFECTS: IF MCHELL WS EHER SE, ERNMENTAL OFFICIALS WHO ARE MARRIAGE OFFICIANTS WOULD BE ABLE TO WED ONLY OPPOSE-SEX UPL. IF THE UMPHRS SE PROCEEDS, THE QUTN OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ULD AGA END UP BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT. IN HIS NCURRG OPN THE CISN OVERTURNG ROE LAST MONTH, CLARENCE THOMAS URGED HIS FELLOW JTIC TO TAKE UP THE ISSUE IF A SE QUTNG THE NSTUTNAL RIGHT TO GAY MARRIAGE PRENTS SELF.RELATED:IF ROE V. WA FALLS, ARE LGBT RIGHTS NEXT? ADVERTISEMENTINSURANCE MANDAT

Acrdg to the Texas judicial missn’s 2019 warng, Hensley referred gay upl who wanted her to pri over their marriage ceremony to other people who would officiate.

TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE FERS TO U.S. SUPREME COURT ON GAY MARRIAGE QUTN

Supreme Court to revis lgs on gay sex and marriage, Texas is the stage for several lawsus alg wh LGBT now, a half dozen s on everythg om surance verage for HIV preventn to employment discrimatn and same-sex marriage are wendg their way through state and feral urts here.

FIFTEEN YEARS AFTER LANDMARK GAY RIGHTS SE, SAME-SEX UPL TEXAS STILL FACE CHALLENG URT

Their out uld radilly alter rights for lbian, gay, bisexual and transgenr people Texas and across the lawsus all have one thg mon: former Texas solicor general Jonathan known as the man behd the state law that allows Texans to file civil lawsus agast people who help pregnant people get abortns, Mchell opened up a law firm At four years ago wh the goal of systematilly dismantlg s of urt lgs he believ part om the U.

Related:After Roe, archect of Texas abortn law sets sights on gay marriage and moreGay marriageDianne Hensley vs. (Northern District of Texas)Summary: Both of the s were brought by Texas officials wh the thory to perform weddgs but who do not want to offer marriag to same-sex upl bee they say vlat their relig se state urt, filed by McLennan County Jtice of the Peace Dianne Hensely, argu that marriage officiants who are ernment officials should be able to rece themselv om performg ceremoni for gay upl if the upl have a viable alternative optn to be wed.

In his ncurrg opn the cisn overturng Roe last month, Clarence Thomas urged his fellow jtic to take up the issue if a se qutng the nstutnal right to gay marriage prents self.

TEXAS JUDGE FIGHTS TO NY WEDDG CEREMONI TO GAY UPL

” The su also targets the Affordable Care Act’s mechanisms for cidg which re private surers mt ver, argug giv the feral agenci and other unelected bodi undue ntrol over cisns that should rema wh su specifilly mentns ntraceptn and the HIV preventn dgs known as PreP, which the platiffs say “facilate and enurage homosexual behavr, prostutn, sexual promiscuy, and traveno dg e. Gay upl are terviewed by media while standg le to register for a marriage license on Friday, June 26, 2015 at the Dallas County Rerds Buildg Dallas, Texas. Supreme Court legalized gay marriage natnwi that year, a number of qutns rema regardg how and when private bs, ernments and dividuals mt regnize the unns.

Supreme Court se legalizg gay marriage appli to private March 8, opn mtee chair Virgia K. ”Breakg NewsGet the latt breakg news om North Texas and lawsu pendg before the Supreme Court volv Denver-area graphic artist Lori Smh, who says she do not want to create webs for gay weddgs due to her Christian beliefs.

“Siar to your qutn, the petner asks the Court whether the law n require her, as a private cizen, to regnize same sex marriag as she pursu her livelihood, ” said Hoelscher, who add that Whe n file his requt aga if his qutns are still unanswered after the high urt was unsurprised by the rponse, and told The News that the Supreme Court se shows the issue of whether private cizens need to regnize gay unns is “still open for discsn.

GAY MARRIAGE ARRIV TEXAS

But legislators never removed the state’s unenforceable law outlawg gay unns, or another statute the urt stck down 2003 banng gay sexual Supreme Court will likely have oral argument at the end of the year the Colorado se, wh an opn probable next StoriThe LattMost Popular on DallasNews. One law profsor at the time said “removed the reflexive assumptn of gay people’s ferry, ” layg the legal groundwork for same-sex marriage.

The lg “gave lbian, bisexual and gay people back their digny, ” said Cala Taylor, a Lambda Legal attorney who started wh the legal advocy group 2003, jt time to watch her lleague, Pl Smh — a gay man himself — argue Lawrence before the Supreme Court.

WHAT THE HISTORY OF GAY MARRIAGE LEGISLATN TEXAS CAN TEACH US ABOUT ITS FUTURE

Ten years later, June 26 beme an even more important tone for gay rights when the high urt stck down the Defense of Marriage Act. When Lawrence me down 15 years ago, Mark Phariss was h off an unsuccsful ph for an anti-discrimatn ordance to protect gay cy employe San Anton. That Republin learship asked the state’s hight urt to take up another high-stak gay rights se — out of Hoton, like Lawrence – that’s bee an emblem of the state’s ntug culture wars.

Though gay upl n now legally marry, the platiffs claim, they don’t have all the same rights as straight upl. “That almost sual dismissal of the rights of gay people was characteristic of Texas urts before Lawrence, and appears to be characteristic of Texas state urts now, ” said Dale Carpenter, a Southern Methodist Universy law profsor who wrote a book on the Lawrence lg.

Smh expects he’ll spend next ssn on the fense agast measur like that one, as well as a slate of “relig refal” bills, which allow dividuals claimg “scere relig beliefs” to ny certa servic or products to gay upl. Y., who is openly gay, emphasized the importance of Congrs steppg to protect same-sex marriage rights.

JUDGE US SUPREME COURT’S GAY WEDDG WEBSE RULG FOR HER OWN ANTI-LGBTQ LAWSU

I've never seen a person e up to me and talk about gettg rid of gay marriage, " he said. Obergefell said Attorney General Ken Paxton’s opn that unty clerks n refe to issue marriage licens to gay upl is only a mor damper on the celebratory mood. Paraphrasg Harvey Milk, Human Rights Campaign Print Chad Griff said bigotry is still a big problem outsi gay-iendly enclav.

Kirk Watson, joed gay rights activists speakg to a crowd that me ready wh rabow beads, rabow flags and posters readg, “Ameri is ready for the eedom to marry. Smh noted that while today’s lg was a major acplishment, Texas still do not have a statewi prohibn of discrimatn agast lbian, gay, bisexual and transgenr people. “Now, I unrstand dividuals may have problems, they may have a difficult time acceptg same-sex unns and gays and lbians as their neighbors, and as their workers, but when you’re a state official the state of Texas, you swear an oath to uphold the Constutn of the Uned Stat of Ameri, addn to the laws and the Constutn of Texas.

AFTER ROE, ARCHECT OF TEXAS ABORTN LAW SETS SIGHTS ON GAY MARRIAGE AND MOREJONATHAN MCHELL, THE FORMER SOLICOR GENERAL WHO HELPED WRE SENATE BILL 8, HAS OPENED A PRIVATE LAW FIRM TEXAS TO GO AFTER S OF HIGH-URT LGS.JONATHAN MCHELL, SHOWN A URTHOE SKETCH ARGUG BEFORE THE U.S. SUPREME COURT NOVEMBER 2021, IS THE FORMER SOLICOR GENERAL OF TEXAS. HE HAS OPENED UP A PRIVATE PRACTICE AT WH THE GOAL OF DISMANTLG URT LGS HE BELIEV WERE WRONGLY CID.(ART LIEN / ART LIEN)BY LREN MCGGHY5:01 AM ON JUL 3, 2022 CDTIF JONATHAN MCHELL WERE A IC BOOK CHARACTER, HE WOULD BE DRAWN HOLDG A LAWBOOK ONE HAND AND THE OTHER, A SLEDGEHAMMER.BT KNOWN AS THE ARCHECT BEHD SENATE BILL 8, THE STATE LAW THAT PUTIZ EVERYDAY TEXANS AS ABORTN BOUNTY HUNTERS, MCHELL HAS SPENT YEARS ARGUG THAT THE U.S. SUPREME COURT SHOULD REVERSE S CISN ROE VS. WA. HIS LEGAL THEORI AND URT S HELPED LAY THE GROUNDWORK ONTO WHICH THE LG ME TOPPLG DOWN.ADVERTISEMENTBUT AS THE RT OF THE UNTRY WAS BRACG FOR THE FALL OF ROE, MCHELL WAS ALREADY MOVG ON. SCE OPENG UP A ONE-MAN LEGAL SHOP AT FOUR YEARS AGO, HE HAS JUMPED HEADLONG TO MYRIAD OTHER LAWSUS OVER EVERYTHG OM THE NTRACEPTIVE MANDATE TO AFFIRMATIVE ACTN AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE.ADVERTISEMENTMCHELL SAYS HIS GOAL IS TO SYSTEMATILLY DISMANTLE S OF LGS HE BELIEV PART OM THE LANGUAGE OF THE U.S. CONSTUTN OR THAT IMPOSE NSTUTNAL RIGHTS WH NO TEXTUAL BASIS. WH THE SUPREME COURT MOVG EVER MORE HIS WAY, THE S HE BRGS MAY BE A BELLWETHER FOR THE DIRECTN OF THE NATN’S LEGAL TABLISHMENT, AND, BY EXTENSN, THE NATN SELF.BREAKG NEWSGET THE LATT BREAKG NEWS OM NORTH TEXAS AND BEYOND.EMAIL ADDRSBY SIGNG UP YOU AGREE TO OUR TERMS OF SERVICE AND PRIVACY POLICYSUBMITIN A RARE TERVIEW, THE FORMER SOLICOR GENERAL OF TEXAS SISTED THAT UNRLYG HIS MISSN IS NOT RELIG BELIEF OR POLIL IOLOGY OR PERSONAL ANIM, BUT AN UNFLCHG NVICTN THAT FERAL URTS MT TERPRET THE CONSTUTN CLOSELY AND NNOT CLARE NEW RIGHTS NOT EXPLICLY AFFORD THAT DOCUMENT.MCHELL SE HIMSELF THE ROLE OF REEMER — NOT STROYER.ADVERTISEMENT“FOR S, THE SUPREME COURT HAS BEEN MAKG UP NSTUTNAL RIGHTS THAT ARE NOWHERE TO BE FOUND THE LANGUAGE OF THE DOCUMENT,” MCHELL, 45, TOLD THE DALLAS MORNG NEWS. “THE CISNS ARE LAWLS, AND THEY NEED TO BE UNRMED AND RISTED AT EVERY TURN UNTIL THE SUPREME COURT SE F TO OVERLE THEM.”BUT WHERE MCHELL SE HIMSELF AS A VOTEE TO THE LE OF LAW, HIS OPPONENTS TECT AN EXTREMIST. REGARD EVEN BY HIS HARSHT CRICS AS AN UNNIABLY SHARP LEGAL MD, THEY FLT HIM FOR, THEIR VIEWS, TENTNALLY DISMISSG PRECENT AND THE REAL-WORLD NSEQUENC OF HIS ACTNS AN EFFORT TO WIPE A NUMBER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OM THE LAWBOOKS.A SHIFT TO TEXTUALISMWHEN MCHELL THREW HIS SUPPORT BEHD MISSISSIPPI’S 15-WEEK ABORTN BAN, THE SE THAT TOPPLED ROE, HE URGED THE SUPREME COURT NOT TO BE SQUEAMISH ABOUT OTHER LGS MIGHT KNOCK DOWN.ADVERTISEMENTINTERRACIAL MARRIAGE IS PROTECTED UNR FERAL CIVIL RIGHTS LAW EVEN THOUGH ’S NOT SPECIFILLY PRERVED THE CONSTUTN, MCHELL WROTE AN AMIC BRIEF THORED BY CHIGO LAW SCHOOL CHUM ADAM MORTARA. THE SAME ULD NOT BE SAID FOR “THE URT-VENTED RIGHTS TO HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE,” THEY ARGUED.ADVERTISEMENTOBERGEFELL VS. HODG AND LAWRENCE VS. TEXAS, THE LGS THAT CLARED BANS ON GAY MARRIAGE AND GAY SEX AS UNNSTUTNAL, WERE “AS LAWLS” AS THE ABORTN LGS, THEY WROTE. IF ROE WERE TO BE OVERTURNED, MCHELL AND MORTARA ARGUED, THE URT SHOULD NOT HATE TO CLARE THAT THE OTHER LGS ARE LIKEWISE “HANGG BY A THREAD.”LAST MONTH, CLARENCE THOMAS SAID JT THAT.IN A NCURRG OPN SUPPORTG THE CISN TO OVERTURN ROE, THE NSERVATIVE JTICE LLED LAWRENCE AND OBERGEFELL “MONSTRABLY ERRONEO CISNS” WH NO BASIS THE CONSTUTN OR U.S. HISTORY. HE URGED HIS FELLOW JTIC TO “RENSIR” THEM.ADVERTISEMENTRELATED:IN ABORTN OPN, THOMAS URG SUPREME COURT TO ‘RENSIR’ GAY RIGHTS LGS THE JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY UNRLYG THE CISN TO OVERTURN ROE IS LLED TEXTUALISM, A THEORY OF TERPRETATN THAT EMPHASIZ A PLA READG OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS BASED ON THEIR TEXT. MCHELL IS A STRONG ADHERENT.“IF A NSTUTNAL RIGHT IS NOT MENTNED THE NSTUTNAL TEXT, DON’T EXIST,” MCHELL SAID A WI-REACHG TERVIEW. “I DON’T RE HOW SIRABLE MAY SEEM AS A MATTER OF POLICY.”HIS RE BELIEF TEXTUALISM IS UNRSRED BY A NCEPT MCHELL ED HIMSELF LLED THE “WR OF ERASURE FALLACY.” COURTS, EVEN THE HIGHT THE LAND, N ONLY STOP CERTA LAWS OM BEG ENFORCED BY CERTA FENDANTS, HIS NCEPT DICTAT; THEY DO NOT HAVE THE POWER TO “ALTER OR ANNUL” THEM.ADVERTISEMENTTHIS MEANS MCHELL VIEWS NEARLY EVERY SUPREME COURT LG AS STRICTLY TEMPORAL — CISNS THAT N BE REVERSED IF THE RIGHT ARGUMENT IS MA ONT OF THE RIGHT SET OF JTIC. AND BY EXTENSN, ANY LAW THAT REMAS ON THE BOOKS, EVEN IF IS EMED UNNSTUTNAL BY THE HIGH URT, N BE REVIVED IF THE URT CHANG S MD.FOR EXAMPLE, TEXAS LEGISLATORS HAVE REFED TO REMOVE THE STATE’S BANS ON SAME-SEX TIMATE RELATNS AND GAY MARRIAGE AND OM THE LAWBOOKS EVEN THOUGH THEY’RE UNENFORCEABLE. AND LAST WEEK, ATTORNEY GENERAL KEN PAXTON ARGUED THAT ABORTNS SHOULD BE ILLEGAL TEXAS IMMEDIATELY BEE THE STATE NEVER REPEALED AN ABORTN BAN ENACTED 1925.JT SIX YEARS AGO, AT THE TIME OF ANTON SLIA’S ATH, THE MAJORY OF SUPREME COURT JTIC ADHERED TO AN TERPRETATN OF THE CONSTUTN THAT LOOKED AT AS A LIVG DOCUMENT AND RELIED MORE ON PRECENT. BUT THE URT HAS SHIFTED AND BEE MORE RECEPTIVE TO TEXTUALIST ARGUMENTS — EVEN LIBERAL JTICE ELENA KAGAN RECENTLY CLARED, “WE’RE ALL TEXTUALISTS NOW.”THIS SHIFT IS ONE BIG REASON MCHELL OPENED UP SHOP TEXAS. THIS IS THE MOMENT, HE BELIEV, TO PURSUE HIS GOAL OF TARGETG CISNS HE NSIRS BASED ON IMPROPER TERPRETATNS OF THE CONSTUTN. AND WH HIS EXPERIENCE THE STATE AND S FAVORABLE TAX LAWS, AT IS THE PLACE TO DO .ADVERTISEMENTTHE ROAD TO TEXASRAISED PENNSYLVANIA, MCHELL ATTEND WHEATON COLLEGE, WHICH BILLS SELF AS PREPARG STUNTS TO “MAKE AN IMPACT FOR CHRIST.” HE WENT ON TO STUDY LAW AT THE UNIVERSY OF CHIGO, WHERE HE GRADUATED WH HIGH HONORS.MORTARA, HIS LAW SCHOOL CLASSMATE, SCRIB HIS LONGTIME IEND AS “EPLY THOUGHTFUL” AND “MORAL,” A MAN LACKG EVEN ONE “UNKD CELL HIS BODY.” HE SISTS MCHELL HAS BEEN HORRIBLY MISCHARACTERIZED AS SOME KD OF A “WTBORO BAPTIST GUY” FIXATED ON TAKG AWAY PEOPLE’S RIGHTS.“HE IS VERY GENTLE,” MORTARA SAID. “HE IS EXTREMELY POLE AND RPECTFUL TO PEOPLE OF ALL BACKGROUNDS.”ADVERTISEMENTAT WHEATON, MCHELL MAJORED PUTER SCIENCE, AND IENDS SAY HE APPROACH LAW WH THE SAME LIBERATE FOC ONE MIGHT WHEN TKERG WH A MACHE. THEY THROW AROUND WORDS LIKE “GENI” AND “VISNARY” AND “NERD.” HE IS PUNCTIL, THEY SAY, UNPROMISG WHEN TO L AND NDUCT, AND WH A HEIGHTENED NCERN FOR MORALY AND S OF NDUCT.BY WAY OF EXAMPLE, ONE IEND OFFERED UP THE WAY MCHELL BILLS HIS HOURS. MOST LAWYERS SPL THEIR TIME ON THE CLOCK TO CREMENTS OF SIX MUT. MCHELL BREAKS HIS DOWN EVEN FURTHER TO ENSURE HE’S NOT OVERCHARGG CLIENTS.“HE’S A HAPPY WARRR,” SAID HIRAM SASSER, A LONGTIME IEND OF MCHELL’S AND EXECUTIVE GENERAL UNSEL OF THE NSERVATIVE LEGAL NONPROF FIRST LIBERTY INSTUTE. “HE’S A FORMIDABLE ALLY.”AFTER LAW SCHOOL, MCHELL CLERKED FOR J. MICHAEL LUTTIG AND SLIA. HE WAS THERE WHEN THE JTICE WROTE ONE OF HIS MOST MEMORABLE DISSENTS TO THE 2003 LAWRENCE LG CLARG TEXAS’ BAN ON GAY SEX UNNSTUTNAL.ADVERTISEMENTFROM 2010 TO 2015, MCHELL SERVED AS TEXAS’ CHIEF APPELLATE LAWYER UNR THEN-ATTORNEY GENERAL GREG ABBOTT. HE ARGUED ONT OF THE SUPREME COURT FOUR TIM AND FEND THE STATE’S LAWS AGAST SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND ABORTN. A MEMBER OF THE NSERVATIVE LEGAL ANIZATN THE FERALIST SOCIETY, HE LATER TGHT LAW AT STANFORD AND THE UNIVERSY OF TEXAS AT AT.THEN-PRINT DONALD TMP NOMATED MCHELL TO HEAD THE ADMISTRATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE UNED STAT, AN AGENCY MEANT TO IMPROVE FERAL LEMAKG AND OTHER PROCS, BUT HE WAS NOT NFIRMED.IN 2018, AS TMP APPOTED HIS SEND OF THREE JTIC TO THE HIGH URT, MCHELL OPENED HIS OWN FIRM AT. IT’S THE FIRST TIME HE’S BEEN PRIVATE PRACTICE.MCHELL HAS THROWN HIMSELF HEADLONG TO THE ABORTN FIGHT TEXAS. HE HELPED DRAFT CY ORDANC THAT SOUGHT TO OUTLAW ABORTN AT THE LOL LEVEL AND HAD A HAND CRAFTG SENATE BILL 8, WHICH EMPOWERS PRIVATE CIZENS TO SUE ANYONE WHO “AIDS OR ABETS” AN ABORTN FOR UP TO $10,000.ADVERTISEMENTTHE BILL, WHICH SENTIALLY BANS ABORTN AFTER ABOUT SIX WEEKS, BEME LAW SEPTEMBER. IT WAS TTED BY THE SUPREME COURT AND ALLOWED TO STAY PLACE.SENATE BILL 8 IS NOW NSIRED MOL LEGISLATN BY OTHER RED STAT THAT MAY E TO PUTIZE THEIR CIZENS TO ENFORCE OTHER NSERVATIVE LAWS. MCHELL’S ROLE CRAFTG THE LEGISLATN TAPULTED HIM TO THE NATNAL SPOTLIGHT.BUT MCHELL HARDLY EVER SPEAKS TO THE MEDIA. HE DON’T APPEAR TO HAVE ANY SOCIAL MEDIA PRENCE. THERE ARE ONLY A HANDFUL OF PHOTOS OF HIM ONLE AND HE WOULD NOT NSENT TO A PORTRA FOR THIS STORY. EVEN WHEN SENATE BILL 8 WAS PASSED TO LAW, HE WASN’T AT THE PUBLIC SIGNG CEREMONY.MCHELL, MARRIED WH CHILDREN, SAYS HE DO NOT HAVE TIME FOR HOBBI AND SE NO NEED TO SEEK THE LIMELIGHT. HIS FIRM DON’T ISSUE NEWS RELEAS WHEN FIL NEW S OR MARKS A W.ADVERTISEMENTTHE PAYOFF THE VICTORY SELF.GAY MARRIAGE SWHILE MCHELL VALU HIS PRIVACY, HIS WORK NOW APPEARS TO BE EVERYWHERE.HE HAS HIS HANDS S OM CALIFORNIA TO NEW YORK VOLVG SUCH DISPARATE NCEPTS AS REDISTRICTG, SUBSIDI FOR BLACK FARMERS AND RELIG LIBERTY. WHILE THERE ARE A HANDFUL OF NSERVATIVE NONPROF LAW FIRMS PURSUG SIAR S, WH WHOM MCHELL AT TIM WORKS TANM, HE SE HIMSELF AS STEPPG TO A VOID WHERE OTHER PRIVATE ATTORNEYS RARELY DARE TO VENTURE.ADVERTISEMENT“THE BIG LAW FIRMS WON’T TOUCH THIS STUFF. SO SOMETIM FEELS AS THOUGH I HAVE THE FIELD TO MYSELF,” MCHELL SAID.AT LEAST TWO OF THE ROUGHLY 50 S HE IS PURSUG VOLVE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE.IN BOTH, MCHELL ARGU THAT ERNMENT EMPLOYE WH THE POWER TO PERFORM MARRIAG TEXAS SHOULD BE ABLE TO RECE THEMSELV OM PERFORMG GAY WEDDGS DUE TO RELIG BELIEFS. ONE OF THE S, WHICH IS AWAG A CISN OM THE FIFTH CIRCU COURT OF APPEALS, PROVIS A PREVIEW OF HOW MCHELL WOULD ARGUE FOR THE REVERSAL OF OBERGEFELL.IN A BRIEF FILED JUNE 2020, MCHELL ARGUED THAT OBERGEFELL IMPROPERLY “SUBORDAT” STATE LAW TO “THE POLICY PREFERENC OF UNELECTED JUDG.”ADVERTISEMENT“THERE IS NO NSTUTNAL RIGHT TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE,” MCHELL ARGUED ON BEHALF OF HIS CLIENT, A UNTY JUDGE WHO ARGU THAT HIS CHRISTIAN FAH PROHIBS HIM OM MARRYG GAY UPL. MCHELL ADD: “THE FERAL JUDICIARY HAS NO THORY TO REGNIZE OR VENT ‘FUNDAMENTAL’ NSTUTNAL RIGHTS.”RELATED:IF ROE V. WA FALLS, ARE LGBT RIGHTS NEXT? THAT’S WHY THEIR AMIC THE ABORTN SE THAT OVERTURNED ROE WAS PURPOSEFULLY PROVOTIVE — PART TO MAKE MISSISSIPPI’S ARGUMENTS APPEAR MORE MORATE PARISON AND TO GIVE THE HIGH URT THE FORTU TO CLARE THAT THE RIGHTS HAD NO BASIS THE CONSTUTN.“WE WANTED TO SHOW THE JTIC THAT THE ENTIRE EDIFICE OF URT-VENTED RIGHTS SHOULD BE REJECTED, BEE MANY OF THOSE RIGHTS [SUCH AS THE RIGHTS TO NTRACEPTN AND TERRACIAL MARRIAGE] ARE PROTECTED BY OTHER SOURC OF FERAL LAW, SO THERE IS NOTHG TO FEAR OM REPUDIATG THE SUPPOSED NSTUTNAL BASIS FOR THOSE RIGHTS,” HE SAID.ADVERTISEMENTDPE THE S, MCHELL SAID HE IS NOT TRYG TO “DISMANTLE” GAY MARRIAGE.IF STATE LEGISLATUR WANT TO PASS LAWS LEGALIZG , THEY N, HE SAID. BUT UNTIL THE CONSTUTN IS AMEND TO CLU THE RIGHT TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, HE ARGU THAT THE SUPREME COURT WRONGLY CID THIS ISSUE AND THE LG IS PLAY.WHEN ASKED ABOUT HIS PERSONAL VIEWS ON THE MATTER, MCHELL SAID HE NSIRS THE POLICY TO BE “A MUCH CLOSER QUTN” THAN WHETHER SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS A NSTUTNAL RIGHT.“I’M A FORMALIST AND LEGALIST BY ORIENTATN,” HE SAID. “POLICY CISNS ARE FOR THE POLIL BRANCH TO SORT OUT.”ADVERTISEMENTOPPONENTS SAY

“It has been said that those who oppose gay marriage are on the wrong si of history.

Sarah Davis (R-Wt Universy) beme the first Texas GOP lawmaker to openly support same-sex marriage when she refed to sign an anti-gay marriage letter penned by her Republin lleagu. Gorczynski said that his dghter, who is gay, had to travel to Mae to get married. Republin Bexar County Judge Eugenia “Genie” Wright married the first gay uple to get a license San Anton late this morng.

Update at 1:35: Dallas County issued s first marriage license to a gay uple jt before noon, to Jack Evans and Gee Harris, who have been together 54 years. Update at 12:06: At the Dallas County offic this morng, out lbian Dallas County Sheriff Lupe Valz said that many gay people have told her that her electn 2004 validated who they are. Kate said the 108-page cisn guarante “the full promise of liberty” to all Texas, cludg the gay, lbian, bisexual and transgenr muny.

JTICE ALO TAK AIM AT GAY MARRIAGE 'POLILLY CHARGED SPEECH'

Hill said discrimatn agast gay people “has been a lifelong stggle for me, ” sce he me out 1958 while a stunt at Galena Park High School.

TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL KEN PAXTON WON'T FEND STATE AGENCY GAY MARRIAGE SE

“We are no longer whtlg away at the jtice and prejudice gays have experienced. Hoton Mayor Annise Parker, the first openly gay lear of a major Amerin cy, cheered the urt’s cisn. Hoton attorney Mchell Kate reprented platiffs the another landmark gay rights se, Lawrence v.

This eveng at Disvery Green downtown Hoton, and Hoton’s annual Gay Pri Para will be Saturday downtown. This is a tly life-affirmg moment for so many gay and lbian upl who want to make the same lifetime mment to the person they love and protect their fai the same way everyone else do.

Texas, a groundbreakg Supreme Court lg strikg down state laws that ma lbian and gay people crimals for havg private timate relatnships. The 37 stat that already have marriage have proven that when gay people share the eedom to marry, fai are helped and no one is hurt. While the work toward equaly for all Texans is far om over, the mpaign for the eedom to marry has been transformative helpg Texans unrstand who gay people are.

APPEALS JUDG RAISE DOUBTS ON GAY MARRIAGE BAN

The imposn of this disabily on gays and lbians serv to disrpect and subordate them. Gay marriage supporters have ma massive stris a very short amount of time. ” Now, though, nearly a third of the stat (ntag nearly forty percent of the populatn) have legalized gay marriage, and most s, that’s been through the actns of elected legislatur or voters at the ballot box.

In Texas, meanwhile, if the stat of gay marriage is gog to change—at least the short term—’ll likely have to be the urts. And there are four lawsus pendg that are challengg the var rtrictns the state that outlaw gay marriage. As we take a look at them, let’s also take a moment to trace the history of gay marriage bans Texas: 1997: Texas Legislature adds the le “A license may not be issued for the marriage of persons of the same sex” to the Fay Seventy-fifth Legislature voted on Sectn 2.

Anticipatg the floodgat that would open shortly after a judge found gay marriage to be nstutnal  Massachetts, the Texas Legislature voted 2003 to add more language to the Fay Co that would ban gay marriage and civil unns through Sectn 6. 2005: Voters approve Texas Proposn 2, which amends the state Constutn to ban gay marriage yet November 2005, voters passed Proposn 2 by a whoppg 53-pot marg.

AFTER ROE, ARCHECT OF TEXAS ABORTN LAW SETS SIGHTS ON GAY MARRIAGE

In 2010, the Fifth Circu Court of Appeals reversed the lower urt’s cisn, fdg that the ban on gay marriage Texas did not vlate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protectn Clse.