A Southern California school board has bee the latt proxy for culture wars brewg across the untry after a nservative bloc voted to formally reject state-endorsed curriculum that would have mentned gay rights figure Harvey Milk.
Contents:
- PREP FOR GAY MEN 101: EVERYTHG GAY MEN NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TAKG HIV PREVENTN MEDITN!
- ABOUT THE CENTERSCE 1983 THE CENTER HAS BEEN SUPPORTG, FOSTERG AND CELEBRATG THE LGBT MUNY OF NEW YORK CY. FD MORE RMATN ON AND OUR WORK ABOUT THE CENTER. VIS ABOUT THE CENTEROUR MISSNCYBER CENTERCENTER HISTORYRACE EQUYMEDIA CENTERLEARSHIP & STAFFEMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNICORPORATE PARTNERSHIPSANNUAL REPORTS & FANCIAL INFORMATNCONTACT USHOURS & LOTNSEMAPSUPPORT THE CENTER
- THE RELEVANCE OF PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS GAY MEN’S LIV AND THEIR MOTIVATNS TO E : A QUALATIVE STUDY
- WHAT IS PREP FOR GAY MEN: EVERYTHG YOU NEED TO KNOW
- MYTH OR TTH: IS PREP JT FOR GAY AND BI MEN?
- TURNS OUT, BARBIELAND ISN'T AS GAY AS S QUEER FANS HAD HOPED
- SOME GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN SEE PREP AS A 'SOCIAL PROBLEM'
- 'PASSAG' DIRECTOR NOUNC 'DANGERO' NC-17 RATG ON A FILM PICTG A GAY LOVE STORY
- “I’M ON PREP, HBU?” – THE MEANG AND INFLUENCE OF PREP AMONG TAIWANE GAY COMMUNY
- MAKG MEANG OF THE IMPACT OF PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS (PREP) ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND SEXUAL CULTURE: NARRATIV OF THREE GENERATNS OF GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN
PREP FOR GAY MEN 101: EVERYTHG GAY MEN NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TAKG HIV PREVENTN MEDITN!
HIV has affected gay men disproportnately the U.S. for four s. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) was veloped as a preventn strategy for dividuals at high risk of HIV fectn. Although highly effective, many gay and other men who have sex wh men ntue not to take PrEP. Rearchers have foced on sexual risk behavrs as the primary termant of who should be on PrEP and intified var objective systemic and societal barriers to PrEP accs. Public health measur have promoted PrEP based on the objective creria. Rearchers have recently begun to quire to subjective and relatnal motivators for PrEP age beyond self-perceived risk. Participants were reced through snowball samplg. Data were llected between Augt and November 2018 om PrEP ers (n = 7) and PrEP non-ers (n = 6). Data were analyzed a modified ground theory qualative analysis. The thirteen participants’ narrativ ntaed three superordate tegori: (1) what ’s like to be someone on PrEP, (2) an environment of changg sexual norms, and (3) the ntued importance of tn. The tegori prised ten them, each of which had var repeatg ias. The ten them were the followg: (1) PrEP’s social acceptabily, (2) PrEP and HIV stigma, (3) PrEP and sexual relatnships, (4) dissatisfactn wh ndoms, (5) negotiatg risk, (6) peace of md, (7) velopg a relatnship wh PrEP, (8) puttg yourself first, (9) PrEP awarens, and (10) PrEP logistics. The gay men our study took to nsiratn their social rol and relatnships, their personal beliefs, and emotnal histori as well as risk as proment motivators for PrEP e. They stated that PrEP e is associated wh their sense of belongg, tst, and secury about their sexualy. They also intified the most relevant aspects of the meditn (e.g., si effects, adherence, and awarens) to their liv. * prep gay culture *
We hope our study enrich extant PrEP rearch through a ground theory approach [27] via terviews of gay men who have nsired g PrEP, focg on the beliefs, feelgs, and experienc that unrgird their sense of the relevance of PrEP e to their liv that then affect whether they are motivated to e .
Eligible participants were reced by the rearchers through emails on their personal and profsnal works, through flyers at lol LGBT service centers, and through Redd msage boards “askgaybros, ” “gay, ” “SampleSize, ” “hivaids, ” and “PrEPared. ” By drawg the nnectn between attus towards PrEP and attus towards gay sex, U7 explicly acknowledged that PrEP e rri social meang and reprents more than jt an HIV preventn the men our study, the meang of intifyg as g PrEP extend beyond notns of belongg and muny and was related to fear and stigma associated wh sex and sexual inty.
This, too, has been supported prev lerature which participants’ skepticism of medil profsnals is a reason why they do not seek talk to their provirs about PrEP [55] men our study njectured that creasg mpaigns to promote PrEP tn, particularly on not only targetg gay men, might help crease uptake. To addrs gaps the lerature and velop greater sight about PrEP’s meang the cultural ntext of gay men specifilly, we asked both gay men who ed PrEP and those who ntemplated PrEP but did not iate about what factors were relevant when they cid whether to e and to the experienc unrgirdg the cisns.
ABOUT THE CENTERSCE 1983 THE CENTER HAS BEEN SUPPORTG, FOSTERG AND CELEBRATG THE LGBT MUNY OF NEW YORK CY. FD MORE RMATN ON AND OUR WORK ABOUT THE CENTER. VIS ABOUT THE CENTEROUR MISSNCYBER CENTERCENTER HISTORYRACE EQUYMEDIA CENTERLEARSHIP & STAFFEMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNICORPORATE PARTNERSHIPSANNUAL REPORTS & FANCIAL INFORMATNCONTACT USHOURS & LOTNSEMAPSUPPORT THE CENTER
Pre-exposure prophylaxis, monly known as PrEP, is a medice taken by gay men who are at risk of ntractg HIV. This meditn is taken ... * prep gay culture *
This meditn is taken the form of a pill and helps prevent the vis om takg hold and spreadg wh the has bee an sential tool the fight agast HIV, and has proven to be highly effective when taken as you cur about PrEP for gay men? Dpe remendatn by the Centers for Disease Control and Preventn, and studi that dite that PrEP n rce HIV transmissn by 96 and up to 99 percent, there are still relatively few gay and bisexual men on the n be hard to fd anyone among your iends to ask about .
Many also flagged the teased scene which Barbie, now the real world, exchang a longg look wh Ameri Ferrera’s Gloria character; though, the relatnship between the two turns out to be a tribute to motherhood and the tradnal, nuclear before the film’s release, Robbie all but squashed the mors that some or any of the Barbi and Kens would be gay, tellg the Brish LGBTQ magaze Attu: The dolls don’t “actually have sexual orientatns. ”As far as the queer-d trailers and promotnal clips for the new “Barbie” film, Rand poted to a phenomenon known as “gay wdow advertisg, ” or the practice of advertisers gturg to queer dienc a way that will go over the heads of those who would disapprove. — A Southern California school board has bee the latt proxy for culture wars brewg across the untry after a nservative bloc voted to formally reject state-endorsed curriculum that would have mentned gay rights figure Harvey Milk.
This qualative study explored the culture of PrEP adoptn and evolvg ncepts of ‘safe sex’ Sydney, Atralia, durg a perd of rapidly latg accs om 2015–2018, drawg on terviews wh sexually active gay men (n = 31) and terviews and foc groups wh key stakeholrs (n = 10). Michael Weste, print of the AIDS Healthre foundatn, dismissed PrEP as a ‘party dg’; Larry Kramer, foundg member of both the Gay Men’s Health Crisis and activist anisatn ACT-UP, scribed takg a pill to prevent HIV rather than g a ndom as ‘wardly’.
THE RELEVANCE OF PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS GAY MEN’S LIV AND THEIR MOTIVATNS TO E : A QUALATIVE STUDY
Fd out why the gay and bi men have cid to go on PrEP. * prep gay culture *
Takg llective rponsibily for sexual health and the avoidance of HIV transmissn among gay men was scribed by Weeks as a ncrete exercise sexual cizenship, and he suggted that men who failed to do this risked moral pariah stat [10]. One of the normative challeng that PrEP brought to HIV preventn disurse was that required dividuals to acknowledge a risk (ndomls or ‘bareback’ sex) that gay men had been told to avoid for three s, outsi of relatnship sex [15].
Recent rearch has also shown both that takg PrEP is associated wh lowered anxiety gay and bisexual men who would otherwise be at risk of HIV [17–19], and that clicians will prcribe PrEP to gay men where there is no clear clil risk of HIV acquisn, speculatg that there might be undisclosed risk factors [20]. Sexually active GBMSM muny participants (n = 31), (hereafter ‘gay muny participants’, as the participants intified as gay) were reced primarily through the social media channel of a lol muny-based LGBTQ+ anisatn, ACON, supplemented by fliers distributed at gay muny anisatns, events, venu and word of mouth.
WHAT IS PREP FOR GAY MEN: EVERYTHG YOU NEED TO KNOW
Today, we look at the myth that PrEP is jt for gay and bisexual men. * prep gay culture *
Although most of the men the gay muny participant group had been havg at least some ndomls sex before PrEP, nearly all the men, whether on PrEP or not, reported that their own sexual practice had been affected directly or directly by creasg PrEP accs. In sexual negotiatn, the massive chang ed by the creasgly pervasive role of on-le sex applitns (hereafter ‘hook up apps’) was as much an issue as the chang HIV risk rctn ocsned by PrEP and treatment-as-preventn, particularly for olr men who were veterans of gay bars and sex-on-premis-venu. The ntext of havg no natnally accsible, fund mechanisms for PrEP accs Atralia some four years after the FDA approval arguably ntributed to heighteng pro-PrEP sentiment [41], bee the global nnectedns of gay male muni allowed men Atralia to wns the sexual eedom that PrEP facilated the U.
PrEP was not the talyst for ndomls sex for most of the men this group, but the troductn and sle-up of PrEP accs arguably enabled men to talk about ndomls sex more openly, and to nsir what matters gay male sex cultur where ndom e is centred. For example, some rearchers have raised the ncept of “PrEP stigma” to intify the negative nnectn between takg PrEP and havg excsive sex or Chemsex (g dgs durg sex) among the Amerin gay muny, severely disuragg MSM om takg PrEP. To disver the answer to the qutns, I have nducted terviews wh gay men who are currently takg PrEP as a preventive measure agast HIV, as well as doctors who specialise fect diseas (whom those who sire PrEP mt first nsult for their prcriptn) to unravel the meang and fluence of PrEP Taiwan.
Dehao: I have always sensed an ternalised homophobia si me…like I feel like we as gay people will evably have HIV someday, so when my doctor remend me to jo this program, my anxiety sudnly got away, and PrEP has been such a psychologil fort for me.
MYTH OR TTH: IS PREP JT FOR GAY AND BI MEN?
* prep gay culture *
Dpe the potential “risk pensatn” of creased STD ntractn, PrEP and s “on-mand” method has bee a succsful tool for Taiwane gay men to self-ntrol how and when they perform unsafe sex, schlg HIV exposure, and psychologilly prepare to enjoy sex whout much ncern.
This shift the sexual culture of gay and bisexual men likely reflected a placency about HIV, wh treatment advanc havg transformed the vis om a lethal diagnosis to a chronic, manageable health ndn (Halkis et al., 2003), as well as a sire for enhanced timacy through sex absent barriers (Carballo-Diéguez & Bermeister, 2004; Halkis et al., 2003). Olr generatns of men who had been vigilant about ndom e for s also experienced “ndom fatigue” as the meang of HIV shifted, optg to forego ndoms and th riskg HIV fectn (Halkis et al., 2003) brief acunt grounds the emergence of PrEP a historil moment but also highlights the way which gay and bisexual men of distct birth horts may diverge their unrstandg of sex and sexual culture bee of their distct relatns to AIDS (Halkis, 2014; Hammack et al., 2018a).
TURNS OUT, BARBIELAND ISN'T AS GAY AS S QUEER FANS HAD HOPED
While HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective, has arguably dispted norms of ‘safe sex’ that for many years were synonymo wh ndom e. This qualative study explored the culture of PrEP adoptn and evolvg ncepts of ‘safe sex’ Sydney, Atralia, durg a perd of rapidly latg accs om 2015–2018, drawg on terviews wh sexually active gay men (n = 31) and terviews and foc groups wh key stakeholrs (n = 10). Data were analysed thematilly. Our rults explored the creasg centraly of ndoms risk rctn and new patterns of sexual negotiatn. Wh regards to stigma, we found that there was arguably more stigma related to not takg PrEP than to takg PrEP this sample. We also found that participants remaed highly engaged wh promotg the wellbeg of their muni through activi as seemgly disparate as regular STI ttg, promotn of PrEP their social circl, and ntributn to rearch. This study has important implitns for health promotn. It monstrat how nstctg PrEP as a rigid new standard to which gay men ‘should’ adhere n alienate some men and potentially create muny divisns. Instead, we remend promotg choice om a range of HIV preventn optns that have both high efficy and high acceptabily. * prep gay culture *
Recent epimlogil rearch revealed that gay and bisexual men unr 34 acunt for 64% of new HIV fectns, while rat of fectn have creased or remaed stable for olr horts of men (Centers for Disease Control and Preventn, 2016). We sought to reveal the way which a paradigm that foregrounds the signifince of narrative and generatn hort challeng notns of gay and bisexual men as a monolhic social tegory (Hammack, 2018; Hammack et al., 2018a), as well as to produce knowledge that n be ed to enhance HIV preventn efforts by rpondg to diverse unrstandgs of Culture and the Course of Gay and Bisexual Men’s LivFollowg early attempts to nstct universal stage-based ncepts of sexual mory inty velopment (e. For example, gay and bisexual men born the 1990s and today early adulthood experienced adolcence durg the marriage equaly movement and may be more likely to see their same-sex attractn as ditive of a normative form of sexual diversy pared wh prr generatns of men (Hammack et al., 2018a).
The way which diverse groups of men engage wh the disurs is a goal of empiril study (Hammack, 2018; Hammack et al., 2018a) the current study, we intified three distct generatns of gay and bisexual men whose experience of health and inty velopment likely diverged owg to distctns the social elogy of velopment.
SOME GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN SEE PREP AS A 'SOCIAL PROBLEM'
Wrten by Yu-Chuan "Daniel" L. Although PrEP meditn solv the HIV epimic, rearch has found an aquate number of MSM receivg . For example, a 2015 U.S. CDC report has dited that at least one of four gay men should be takg PrEP daily to effectively avoid more extensive HIV transmissn, requirg the participatn of… * prep gay culture *
However, men of this generatn experienced signifint loss wh the emergence of the AIDS panmic the 1980s and the cultural backlash that nmned homosexualy and the sexual mory muny at large (Herek & Glunt, 1988) of the AIDS-1 generatn had experienced a sexual culture early adulthood which ndomls sex wh multiple partners was normative. Men of this generatn experienced shifts gay male sexual culture their twenti and wnsed the emergence of PrEP their of the youngt generatn, which we refer to as the Post-AIDS Generatn, were born the 1990s and were 18–25 years old at the time of our study. Hence their entire experience of sexual culture has occurred at a time which PrEP was available as a highly effective preventn tool, and barebackg was seen as creasgly ls sum, gay and bisexual men alive today are members of distct generatn horts whose velopment likely diverg based on the history of gay men’s sexual culture over the past half-century (Hammack et al., 2018a).
Schwartz and Grimm (2017) examed over 1000 of the top tweets on Twter about PrEP the year before was officially endorsed by the CDC as a highly remend preventn tool for gay and bisexual men who are HIV-negative and at substantial risk of HIV fectn. The stigmatizg or “anti-stigma” tweets were the most likely to be selected as a “favore” and to be current ntext is one which knowledge and awarens of PrEP is a state of broad emergence wh muni of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex wh men. While rearch suggts that knowledge and awarens of PrEP among gay and bisexual men is creasg over time (Mosley, Khaketla, Armstrong, Cui, & Sereda, 2018), many men are unaware of PrEP and s potential benefs for HIV preventn (Fallon, Park, Ogbue, Flynn, & German, 2017; Hoff et al., 2015; Merchant et al., 2016).
'PASSAG' DIRECTOR NOUNC 'DANGERO' NC-17 RATG ON A FILM PICTG A GAY LOVE STORY
No studi to our knowledge have ed qualative methods orr to more closely terrogate hort differenc attus or narrative acunts of gay and bisexual men appear to be an active state of cisn makg about whether to e PrEP (e. In orr to tailor effective msagg to diverse muni of gay and bisexual men, rearch is need to unrstand the way which men are currently engagg wh narrativ of the meang and effectivens of PrEP for public health and sexual Current StudyTo exame variabily how gay and bisexual men are engagg wh petg narrativ of PrEP and s impact on public health and sexual culture, we terviewed men of distct birth horts whose ntext of velopment diverged wh regard to sexual culture and HIV/AIDS (Hammack et al., 2018a).
Venu clud bars, non-bar mercial tablishments (such as ffee shops and gyms), outdoor areas (such as parks), muny anizatns and groups (such as groups uned by shared polil, cultural, racial, and ethnic inti or terts), events (such as Gay Pri), onle social media (such as Facebook and Instagram), and other onle muni (such as newsletters and onle publitns).
Potential participants were eligible for the study if they rid wh 80 of New York Cy, Tucson, At, or San Francis ( both urban and non-urban areas), if they intified as lbian, gay, or bisexual (although they uld e other terms, such as “queer, ” “pansexual, ” “two-spir, ” etc. Our qualative approach allowed to go beyond valence, then, to terrogate meang makg so as to rm public health approach to promote ductive thematic analysis, we intified three overarchg them prent participants’ narrativ about PrEP: (1) PrEP has had a posive impact on public health by effectively preventg the transmissn of HIV/AIDS; (2) PrEP has had a posive impact on gay men’s sexual culture by rcg anxiety and makg sex more fortable and enjoyable; and (3) PrEP has had a negative impact on public health and sexual culture by creasg ndomls, multi-partner sex.
“I’M ON PREP, HBU?” – THE MEANG AND INFLUENCE OF PREP AMONG TAIWANE GAY COMMUNY
I ed to do the AIDS Walk every year and I disver—I seen the growg change of people wantg to be more protected ’s narrative posns PrEP as part of the larger history of AIDS for gay men, viewg PrEP as a step toward greater protectn for gay men’s e of PrEP was perceived by many the post-AIDS generatn as a reflectn of the re that young people the LGBT muny take to te and protect themselv. Siarly, Josh, a 23-year-old Amerin Indian gay man, perceived PrEP as expandg the optns to protect the muny agast HIV:There’s also that other assurance of if you e ndoms and you e PrEP then you have a smaller chance of ntractg HIV… I thk ’s pretty ol now that there’s optns. I’m glad that do work…I’m feelg very enuraged by ’s narrative reveals enthiasm for the availabily of PrEP, and he regniz s effectivens to prevent Cyril, Ron, a 55-year-old Black gay man, also endorsed the narrative that PrEP is an effective HIV preventn tool.
Hector, a 58-year-old gay Lato man, also endorsed the narrative that PrEP has the potential to make a posive impact on public health and exprsed the sire for to be more available, sayg, “I’m all for bee there’s still risky behavr gog on… I thk that, yeah, if a person should have somethg available that uld help them, like, I thk Tvada is beg ed. I thk jt feelg relieved gog to sex mak more, a 23-year-old whe gay man, echoed this sentiment and observed that sce startg to take PrEP several months before the terview, “I thk PrEP will make a ltle b safer, and I’ll feel more secure knowg that that’s there…I’m a ltle more nfint now. For those that are paranoid before n be more fortable…I feel like if I did go on PrEP, I too would be a ltle b more—I would be more willg to have sex wh a stranger, like if I jt met them…By rcg barriers to engagg sexual activy and rcg the fear of ntractg HIV, PrEP was perceived by many younger participants as ntributg to a more open, ee, accsible, and enjoyable sexual asked if the availabily of meditns such as PrEP have changed the way people approach and talk about sex, Adrian, a 24-year-old Lato gay man, replied:Defely.
MAKG MEANG OF THE IMPACT OF PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS (PREP) ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND SEXUAL CULTURE: NARRATIV OF THREE GENERATNS OF GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN
” A member of the olr hort, Greg, a 52-year-old Black gay man, echoed ncerns about PrEP’s limatns enhancg safety:Jt bee you’re on PrEP don’t necsarily mean that you shouldn’t still practice safe sex, that you shouldn’t be ncerned about all the other sexually transmted diseas and s impact on everybody, pecially that person that you’re gog to be Greg’s narrative illtrat, many men across generatns appeared to place Tvada and s e outsi the ame of “safe sex, ” both bee they associate wh ndomls, multi-partner sex and bee they are skeptil of s effectivens. For example, Stt, a 23-year-old whe gay man, stated:It almost seems like PrEP is enuragg unsafe sexual behavr to some gree amongst certa muni, that if you go on Craigslist or Grdr or what have you, sometim ’s mentned for people who are terted sex whout ndoms or protectn as an enuragement to have that type of sexual teractn…It has been a benef that ’s another optn, but seems like ’s enuragg negative behavr that’s, a 24-year-old Amerin Indian and whe bisexual man, also exprsed doubts about PrEP’s posive impact:I’m not sure of how good an effect ’s had. It’s jt om what I’ve seen is that there’s a lot more people that are willg to risk that like Stt and Corey exprsed ncern that the emergence of PrEP has created a new sexual culture that promot multi-partner sex whout ndoms—a shift that he and others see as potentially dangero for gay and bisexual men distanced themselv om this domant nceptn, such as Alex, a 20-year-old Lato gay man, who stated, “I’m not on PrEP.