In most public discsns, the issue of same-sex marriage is posed as a simple qutn – for or agast? – where to be for or agast is to be, more or ls, for or agast gay people. Although don’t…
Contents:
- WHY 'GAY MARRIAGE' IS EVIL
- GAY MARRIAGE
- SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?
- GAY MARRIAGE NTRIBUT TO 'THE GREATT EVIL' OUR UNTRY SAYS FORMER HEAD OF ENGLISH CATHOLIC CHURCH
WHY 'GAY MARRIAGE' IS EVIL
And so the notn of "same-sex" marriage is a self-featg proposn. "Gay marriage" is not marriage at all * gay marriage is evil *
Hence, we n leate that which is "gay marriage" by first unrstandg marriage self. Therefore what God has joed together, let no one separate'" (Matthew 19:4-6) nspicuoly, and as I've noted before, J did not say: "At the begng the Creator ma them lbian, gay, bisexual and transgenr (LGBT). "Gay marriage" is not marriage at is what?
Moreover, the very thg that f "gay marriage, " the blogilly and spirually disorred act of same-sex sodomy, likewise mocks God's sign for natural sexual terurse. Homosexualy is mock "gay marriage" is mock, aga, and lt there be any uncertaty as to where I'm gog wh all this, "same-sex marriage" is evil – always and whout exceptn. If God signed biblil marriage and natural human sexualy, and He did, then we are left no doubt as to who signed s unterfe – as to who fabrited pagan "gay marriage" and otherwise perverted God's perfect purpos for human sexualy.
GAY MARRIAGE
* gay marriage is evil *
"Gay marriage" is 's only Barber is founr and edor- chief of He is an thor, lumnist, cultural analyst and an attorney ncentratg nstutnal law.
SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?
The road to full marriage equaly for same-sex upl the Uned Stat was paved wh setbacks and victori. The landmark 2015 Supreme Court se Obergefell v. Hodg ma gay marriage legal throughout the untry. * gay marriage is evil *
– where to be for or agast is to be, more or ls, for or agast gay people. Although don’t get much airtime beyond queer unterpublics, there is an adamantly left-wg, progrsive and pro-gay perspective that suggts same-sex marriage is not a necsary good.
Lbian and gay muni, and the femist muni wh which they have historilly overlapped, have long celebrated the valu of sexual diversy over the sexual nformy reprented by marriage and the ethil importance of sexual straight-talkg rather than the double-standards so equently observed marriage’s vicy. Gay men and lbians n sneak around wh the bt of them, of urse, but marriage, as is legally fed, generat ndns for dishonty, disavowal and sexual hypocrisy. There’s a tenncy among s proponents to reprent same-sex marriage as the fal chapter the story of gay acceptance, “the last civil right” as has sometim exaggeratedly been lled.
It is large part bee of femist and gay novatns livg that marriage today is creasgly unrstood not as a relig but a social relatn; characterised not by male domatn but equaly and mutualy between the sex; valued not terms of s ntractual basis but terms of s ongog ntributn to a person’s sense of well-beg; and mataed not until ath-do--part but for as long as both parti fd satisfactn . Rather than adm lbians and gay men to marriage as currently nceived, we should avow more fully the range of optns that characterise a lot of our liv and livg arrangements.
GAY MARRIAGE NTRIBUT TO 'THE GREATT EVIL' OUR UNTRY SAYS FORMER HEAD OF ENGLISH CATHOLIC CHURCH
Why not support and regnise the alternative timaci that gay muni, among others, have been velopg for s? The argument favor of extendg legal marriage to same-sex upl pends primarily on wantg to extend the benefs and privileg of marriage to lbian and gay upl.
Allowg gay men and lbians to marry will not stop marriage om beg exclnary. In regnisg some gay and lbian relatnships as marriag, same-sex marriage emphasis the ntued illegimacy of other sexual arrangements and the ntued excln of other social actors. Now this ragtag bunch might not seem as worthy of social protectn and prtige as the lovg, rg, long-term gay and lbian upl that are the shy new poster boys and girls for same-sex marriage.
Early Years: Same-Sex Marriage Bans In 1970, jt one year after the historic Stonewall Rts that galvanized the gay rights movement, law stunt Richard Baker and librarian Jam McConnell applied for a marriage license Gerald Nelson rejected their applitn bee they were a same-sex uple, and a trial urt upheld his cisn. ” This lg effectively blocked feral urts om lg on same-sex marriage for s, leavg the cisn solely the hands of stat, which alt blow after blow to those hopg to see gay marriage beg 1973, for stance, Maryland beme the first state to create a law that explicly f marriage as a unn between a man and woman, a belief held by many nservative relig groups. Though the gay rights movement saw some advancements the 1970s and 1980s—such as Harvey Milk beg the first openly gay man elected to public office the untry 1977—the fight for gay marriage ma ltle headway for many years.